92 Percent of Americans Want European Socialism

[JBeukema]

Specifically, they want to live in Sweden

Study: Most Americans Want Wealth Distribution Similar to Sweden | AlterNet

What a bunch of bullshit. Guess who would cry the most if we actually went socialist? You got it ... the left. They;d be whining their powder and pamper and diaper my ass from cradle to grave asses off.

Care to elaborate, or did you just come to ramble like a drunk man?

 

[Gunny]

So you oppose hereditary private ownership of land, water, and other resources?

If you bought and paid for the land then its yours to leave it to who you will.

If there are resources on MY land then they are mine to do with what i will.

So you support stealing from the next generation.

Obama stole from the next 3 generations.

 

[Gunny]

Specifically, they want to live in Sweden

Study: Most Americans Want Wealth Distribution Similar to Sweden | AlterNet

What a bunch of bullshit. Guess who would cry the most if we actually went socialist? You got it ... the left. They;d be whining their powder and pamper and diaper my ass from cradle to grave asses off.

Care to elaborate, or did you just come to ramble like a drunk man?

Talk about the pot calling calling the kettle black.

 

[JBeukema]

If you bought and paid for the land then its yours to leave it to who you will.

If there are resources on MY land then they are mine to do with what i will.

So you support stealing from the next generation.

Obama stole from the next 3 generations.

Surprise!

He's no different than the rest of 'em.

So long as idiots keep buying into the two-party bullcrap, expect more of the same.

 

[JBeukema]

What a bunch of bullshit. Guess who would cry the most if we actually went socialist? You got it ... the left. They;d be whining their powder and pamper and diaper my ass from cradle to grave asses off.

Care to elaborate, or did you just come to ramble like a drunk man?

Talk about the pot calling calling the kettle black.

I haven't been sloshed in years. Can you say the same? Sometimes I wonder whether you're posting from the pub.

 

[Gunny]

So you support stealing from the next generation.

Obama stole from the next 3 generations.

Surprise!

He's no different than the rest of 'em.

So long as idiots keep buying into the two-party bullcrap, expect more of the same.

We finally agree on something. Both parties suck and both parties just want to rip off the little man.

Difference is, which one we see as the worst. I see the commie currently in office as the worst ever. I see William Henry Harrison as a more effective President than O blah blah, and Nixon less of a crook than O blah blah.

That socialist moron sucks so bad he could suck the chrome off a bumper hitch.

 

[JBeukema]

Difference is, which one we see as the worst.

No, the difference is you think one is worse. I can't tell any real material difference in the two when it comes to what happens to the average man.

I see the commie currently in office as the worst ever

A commie? Commies bail out banks, give tax incentives to big oil, and oversee a move towardsa new Free Trade Agreement with Brazil?

Seriously, man. You need to sober up.What has he really done that's any different than Bush? A bigger version of Romneycare? Bush gave us Medicare Part D- you know, unfunded socialist medicine.

Only difference is the one Obama ran on: not being an old white man

 

[bucs90]

Only difference Obama ran on: Not being an old white man.

Correct. That was the only thing he offered. And it worked on all the stupid left wingers who were dumb enough to vote for him.

 

[idb]

Would Sweden take those 92 percent?

They will probably only take people with blond hair and great bodies. I am fairly certain that will fall below 92% of the US population.

That may be what Sweden used to look like. This is Sweden today:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlG75wb7lLw&feature=related]YouTube - Welcome to Sweden of Today.[/ame]

Sheesh...it's really gone to the pack since all those Americans started emigrating there!

 

[Truthseeker420]

Quit trying to diminish what and who JFK was. He was a man and would be appalled at what you leftists have turned the Democratic party into.

JFK would be considered a middle-right Republican today. He and Reagan were our last "great" presidents. They were the last 2 presidents who truly wanted the US to be the most powerful nation on Earth. The post-Reagan presidents? Not sure.

JFK was the last Democrat President who had a pair to swing between his legs. He actually put up, against his father's wishes, to fight for this nation. LBJ listened to idiots, and Carter listened to a bigger idiot -- himself -- and nothing but girlie panties from the left there ever after. I bet Clinton and O blah blah played with Barbies.

Carter's problem was he didn't realize how selfish and short sighted Americans were(are) and how gullble most are in America. I still laugh my ass off when I hear someone say Reagan scared the Iranians into releasing the Hostages.

 

[editec]

92 % of American want a system that works where they can go to work and raise their families. They want personal liberty and they want justice.

I doubt very much what people call that system much matters, just as long as it works.

 

[chanel]

How much does Sweden spend on their military? What do illegal aliens cost them? How many unwed mothers are there? 92 percent of Americans must have forgotten about that.

No wonder the Swedes don't have to steal from their granchildren.

 

[mudwhistle]

Specifically, they want to live in Sweden

Study: Most Americans Want Wealth Distribution Similar to Sweden | AlterNet

You might want to quit cherry-picking the details in your references.

I also noticed that your link said that 40% consider themselves to be conservative while on 20% identify themselves as liberals.

Also your link state thusly:

But the study also found that respondents preferred Sweden's model over a model of perfect income equality for everyone, "suggesting that Americans prefer some inequality to perfect equality, but not to the degree currently present in the United States," the authors state.

It also seems that the study found that during the Obama hope and change period income inequality went up, not down. What does that say about his policies? That they don't work as intended or that they work as they secretly are intended?

 

[mudwhistle]

How much does Sweden spend on their military? What do illegal aliens cost them? How many unwed mothers are there? 92 percent of Americans must have forgotten about that.

No wonder the Swedes don't have to steal from their granchildren.

The Swedes are benefiting from our protective umbrella as well.

It's much less expensive living off the American tit then it is to pay for your own defense.

 

[jgarden]

Do I get to pick which ones to send there?

You want to get rid of 92 of the population?

Wouldn't it be more cost-effective and democratic to "get rid" of the 8%?

 

[jgarden]

How much does Sweden spend on their military? What do illegal aliens cost them? How many unwed mothers are there? 92 percent of Americans must have forgotten about that.

No wonder the Swedes don't have to steal from their granchildren.

The Swedes are benefiting from our protective umbrella as well.

It's much less expensive living off the American tit then it is to pay for your own defense.

Perhaps "midwhistle" and "chanel" would care to explain where this vaunted American military "protective umbrella" was in 1914 (WW1) and 1939 (WW2) when the fate of world freedom and democracy hung by a thread?

Perhaps "midwhistle" and "chanel" would care to explain the credibility of their claim that the US military provides a "protective umbrella" for Sweden, when in reality even "chanel" admits that America can't even secure its own Mexican border from "illegal aliens?"

Perhaps "chanel" would also care to explain what possible relevance the presence of "unwed mothers" in America has to do with Sweden - rumor has it that the Swedes have also discovered sex!

 

[chanel]

Really? Swedes have sex? Newsflash; sex is generally free. Fatherless children are not.

I am not going to explain why we are the world's police. It is out of my area of expertise. But what I do know is that we are. And it costs a lot. Do you have any numbers on the cost of the Swedish military for comparison?

 

[signelect]

Just think for a monment, if 92% leave then look at the room we have for the illegals, I bet we can turn the US into a large Mexico in just a few years. Hope and Change, way to go Barak.

 

[Misty]

Bye bye 92%. Have fun dealing with Muslims gangs.

http://undhimmi.com/2010/04/27/muslim-gang-forces-closure-of-swedish-kindergarten/

"Herrgården has also served as a flashpoint for many of the disturbances that have plagued the predominantly immigrant suburb of Rosengård in recent years.

Around the pre-school lie shards of glass while the front of the building is marked by a bullet hole, the source of which is unknown.

“This is caused by gangs of criminal youths, or idiots as I usually call them,” Andreas Konstantinides, chairman of the Rosengård district council, told the online edition of the Svenska Dagbladet daily.

Sweden’s problem, much like Britain, is that the political mainstream and media refuse to recognise that there is a problem. Parts of the country (in particular parts of Malmö) are essentially ungovernable and are no-go areas for the police and emergency services.

Muslim thugs enforce gang law and fight Jihad against the host country. The leftist politicians are incapable of exerting control and it’s getting worse – yet the left wing Mayor, in a leap of logic that would shame Robert Mugabe, thinks Israel is to blame."

 

[Claudette]

How much does Sweden spend on their military? What do illegal aliens cost them? How many unwed mothers are there? 92 percent of Americans must have forgotten about that.

No wonder the Swedes don't have to steal from their granchildren.

The Swedes are benefiting from our protective umbrella as well.

It's much less expensive living off the American tit then it is to pay for your own defense.

Perhaps "midwhistle" and "chanel" would care to explain where this vaunted American military "protective umbrella" was in 1914 (WW1) and 1939 (WW2) when the fate of world freedom and democracy hung by a thread?

Perhaps "midwhistle" and "chanel" would care to explain the credibility of their claim that the US military provides a "protective umbrella" for Sweden, when in reality even "chanel" admits that America can't even secure its own Mexican border from "illegal aliens?"

Perhaps "chanel" would also care to explain what possible relevance the presence of "unwed mothers" in America has to do with Sweden - rumor has it that the Swedes have also discovered sex!

Jesus talk about lame points. Try talking about today pal. I guess you never heard of NATO?? NATO did not exist in 1914 or 1939 but it does today and it doesn't come cheap.