92 Percent of Americans Want European Socialism

"MUSLIM immigration has turned Sweden into the rape capital of the world. Yet only 3% of Muslim rapists are ever convicted. And politicians continue to insist that more of these uncivilized refugees are needed.

Arab and African MUSLIM refugees in their 20′s and 30′s who claim to be teenagers to get more welfare benefits. Almost 100 % of them show false id’s or no id’s at all, therefore they are never truly identified. *The government claims “we need more refugees” so politiicans allows mass immigration of mostly illiterate garbage from Muslim countries.*Even worse, the government TV has started a new indoctrination series to teach the Swedes how to become good Muslims. Its called, “Islam for beginners.” I wonder if that includes how to rape young girls?"

sounds heavenly. Morons. Those sweet peaceful Muslims.

http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com...mmigrants-gang-rape-11-year-old-swedish-girl/
 
Last edited:
Sweden sounds awesome.

Especially the muslim thugs.

"Breaking: Swedish Christian Democrat Attacked by Gang of 40 Islamic Thugs
by SHEIKYERMAMI on SEPTEMBER 26, 2010
Swedish Democrat *harassed by gang of 40

Stones crushed the Syrian Issa Issa’s windows in his and his family’s apartment in Gothenburg in Sweden, on Thursday. The family had to lay down on the floor to hide from the attack.

- F…ing christian! F…ing Swedish Democrate! Come down here!
Shoutings to the christian Syrian, Swedish politician, who later in hospital decided to quit politics.



So the mob got what they wanted. They frightened and terrorized him from going ahead with Swede-friendly politics.

Issa and his brother went downstairs, got trapped outside, shots were fired, he got kicked lying down on the ground, he was cut with knives, by this gang of about forty 15 – 20 year olds.

This is Swedish politics 2010. Would you believe it?

This incident follows the harrassment and nondemocratic ways during the elections i Sweden 19 September 2010.

See the daily Aftonbladet
Ironically, on the same page, there’s the campaign “We don’t like hostility against strangers” with the SOS Racism symbolic hand from earlier years, “Don’t touch my friend”

According to the victim, the attackers were from the Middle East, chasing a Syrian – in Sweden.

Han lämnar SD efter överfallet | Valet 2010 | Nyheter | Aftonbladet
 
You can add France to that scenario as well.

They let thousands of Muslims into their country. The Muslims do no assimilate into the population. Now France has big problems with them.

Hope they have fun.
 
How much does Sweden spend on their military?

Maybe if we stopped trying to conquer the entire world?
What do illegal aliens cost them?

What did they cost us before NAFTA? You know about NAFTA, right?

bring the economy back into line with reality
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnVL0d9fwkY]YouTube - The Wonderful World of NAFTA (Part 1/2)[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxQQael1ueE]YouTube - The Wonderful World of NAFTA (Part 2/2)[/ame]

The U.S. is a huge part of why the Mexican farmers lost their livelihood and became illegal entrants.
How many unwed mothers are there?

Who's fighting that culture war to convince the youngsters to abandon traditional values and notions of family?
 
Its a free country and anyone can leave any time they want if they don't like it here.


I am not part of that 92%. I would not have wealth re-distributed. I am no thief. I don't want to steal what belongs someone else.


Thats great and all but what about the employees that earned them the money. Right now, productivity has increased while wages are stagnant. Thats stealing from the poor and Middle class and its accepted by the republicans.

Many companies lowball their employees on the wage side even if they are a very productive employee. Ask for a raise and you are fired immediately. Thats our world today.

And you wonder why people would rather be in a country that rewards all citizens for their hard work. Not to mention top notch healthcare and education. It's what Socialism can be if its fully embraced.

You are so easy to read. You're a dude who likely works a low-level, low skill job...and probably show up daily bitching about how the company owes you and all your other box stackers so much more money. You're the lunch-break communist. The only problem is, you either lack the work ethic, education or ability to land a job that does pay more, and you're stuck where you are. Whining about how the government should force your boss to pay you what YOU think you deserve is your last option.


Anyway......I'll await your response telling me how rich you are and how you live in some island paradise getaway.

Told you I am a High School Math teacher. Try again.
 
Would Sweden take those 92 percent?

They will probably only take people with blond hair and great bodies. I am fairly certain that will fall below 92% of the US population.

That may be what Sweden used to look like. This is Sweden today:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlG75wb7lLw&feature=related]YouTube - Welcome to Sweden of Today.[/ame]
interestin. I have a lot of Scandinavians as neighbors. They agree.
 
How much does Sweden spend on their military? What do illegal aliens cost them? How many unwed mothers are there? 92 percent of Americans must have forgotten about that.

No wonder the Swedes don't have to steal from their granchildren.

The Swedes are benefiting from our protective umbrella as well.

It's much less expensive living off the American tit then it is to pay for your own defense.
Really? Swedes have sex? Newsflash; sex is generally free. Fatherless children are not.

I am not going to explain why we are the world's police. It is out of my area of expertise. But what I do know is that we are. And it costs a lot. Do you have any numbers on the cost of the Swedish military for comparison?
********************************************************************************
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

-Dwight D. Eisenhower, Military-Industrial Complex Speech, January 1961

In the councils of government... at BrainyQuote
- guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence

- by the military-industrial complex

- potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power

- exists and will persist.

The real "benefactor" of this US "world's police" image has, and will continue to be, the American military-industrial complex. Even during the Cold War, 50 years ago, Eisenhower warned about "the disastrous rise of misplaced power!"

Just because the US failed to learn her lesson doesn't mean that America's allies should ignore Eisenhower's words, and willing condemn themselves to the same fate!
 
Last edited:
Only a sick person would voluntarily give up liberty to exist in a socialist state. They would have to be sick or without the ambition to chart their own course in life. I guess that's called lazy.
 

There was an interesting study that came out in 2007 which you might find interesting:

The media often report that U.S. income inequality has increased steadily in recent decades. Pundits and policymakers have decried the apparent rise in the share of national income going to those at the top. But has inequality really increased? In a recent book, Income and Wealth, and new Cato study, Alan Reynolds takes a close look at the data on incomes and finds serious flaws in the way those data are being used to track trends over time. He will discuss why he believes that there is little evidence that U.S. income inequality has increased, at least since the late 1980s.

Has U.S. Income Inequality Increased? | Cato Institute: Policy Forum

Who founded the Cato Institute? Does it have a political leaning?
 
Only a sick person would voluntarily give up liberty to exist in a socialist state. They would have to be sick or without the ambition to chart their own course in life. I guess that's called lazy.

WOW !

ok

Damn right, ok. There is no way a socialist state is going to allow me the liberty that I have in a free society like the USA or at least like the USA is supposed to be like.
 
Only a sick person would voluntarily give up liberty to exist in a socialist state. They would have to be sick or without the ambition to chart their own course in life. I guess that's called lazy.
Special Canada Day Report: How Canada stole the American Dream

The numbers are in. Compared to the U.S., we work less, live longer, enjoy better health and have more sex. And get this: now we're wealthier too.

http://www.macleans.ca/canada/national/article.jsp?content=20080625_50113_50113

When Americans have the "liberty" to "chart their own course in life, why dies that "require(s) them to work longer, save less, have less sex, live unhealthier lives and die younger than their "so-called" more less ambitious, lazy "socialist" Canadian counterparts?

Canadian "socialists" want to know what part "Jack Fate's" concept of "liberty" and the "American Dream" are Canadians are doing without?

more diseases - no

fewer sex partners - no

less adventurous in bed - no

more teen pregnancies - no

more sexually transmitted diseases- no

less leisure time with family - no

less leisure time with friends - no

less time exploring the world - no

more chance of spending time in jail - no

greater chance of being shot - no

more violent crime -no

more divorce -no

lower median family income - no (Canadian family was worth US$122,600 in 2005 versus American family at US$93,100 in 2004)

more family debt - no (median Canadian family 30% wealthier than the median American family)

decreased value of dollar -no (Cdn dollar wnt from $0.69 American in 1980's to $1.05 American in 2011)

"brain drain" to US -no

lower quality of life -no (2011 Human Development Index)

lower productivity - no

increased taxes - no

greater personal debt - no (in 2005, Canadians averaged US$23,460 per person, American averaged US$40,250)

greater % of income spent on housing - no (Canadians spend about approximately 19% of annual household
expenditure on housing costs, Americans spend 34%)

high medical insurance costs - no (universal healthcare paid by geberal tax revenues)

work harder - no (average Canadian worker in 2004 put in 35 hours of work per week, versus 38 hours for Americans)

less vacation time - no (average Canadian gets 17 vacation days a year, takes 16 versus average American who gets 14 days and takes 11)

more ambitious for material goods - no ( "There's more ambition. More ambition to acquire more in terms of money and career. Whereas Canadians seem to be more European in that we care more about enjoying life.")

less equality -no (The gaps between rich and poor, or black and white within the confines of the U.S. are much deeper and wider than the gap between the two countries ..."Canada is just a country of left-wing urban Americans.")

happiness - While Americans are putting in overtime to pursue the American dream, we're at the pub having a few pints with friends. They may have bigger cars and bigger homes, but they're living under a mountain of debt. They look richer, but the numbers prove that they're not. The truth is that all of that competition, all of that keeping up with the Joneses, can take its toll. Getting ahead can be a lot easier when everyone is moving in the same direction. "The pursuit of happiness is ingrained in Americans as part of what it means to be an American, but in Canada, happiness is almost something of a by-product of coexisting peacefully."
 
Last edited:
Only a sick person would voluntarily give up liberty to exist in a socialist state. They would have to be sick or without the ambition to chart their own course in life. I guess that's called lazy.

WOW !

ok

Damn right, ok. There is no way a socialist state is going to allow me the liberty that I have in a free society like the USA or at least like the USA is supposed to be like.
liberty ? really ? how old are you ? just after 9/11 young Americans were saying aloud they would give up some of their freedoms to "feel " safe . a dilution of safety and pop goes the rights one by one .
if you are one of them why not security as well ?

Americans will gladly give up freedoms , remember what bush said , they constitution nothing but a god damn peace of paper .

the states are supposed to be like ? you mean racists ? two sides of the tracks ? wrong side of town ?
how about separate bathrooms ? drinking fountains ?it was like that you know .

just not enough whites any more .

you don't have to be a socialist to not care about freedom .

neo-con had their way you'd be as free as they let you , same for libs , your wrong when you don't think like me ,

now a country that tax's the people 50% , but gives you free medical sends your kids through collage and pay the kids as the go a salary . housing , and takes better care of their elderly much better then we do .

and more ,
well I fined that compelling .especially the drug laws .
 

Forum List

Back
Top