Those laws were passed AT THE REQUEST of black leaders to give their communities more protection from the drug that was, to quote them, "committing genocide on their own people".
ONly someone ignorant of what was actually happening at the time, could present this as "evidence" of racism.
I lived though that time, and I saw people use both. From my observations, crack cocaine is worse, and should be dealt with more severely.
YOu might disagree. Maybe I am even wrong. But my opinion is sincere and not designed to punish crack users more than power users.
Like hell they were. Black leaders did not ask the government to pass laws that put more young Black men in jail in laws at a 100 to 1 ratio to a drug predominantly used by whites......
Yes, they did. They saw the harm being done to blacks by crack and wanted the dealers to be stopped.
You ever watch a movie called New Jack City? From 1991?
You are using a fictional movie as a source to support your argument? Are you serious?
The stories we tell, tell a lot about US.
New Jack City is a window into what Hollywood thought of the crack epidemic in the late 80s/early 90s.
And it is exactly as I said it was. NOt from the government. NOt from some rightwing guy, but from one of the strongest stronghold of modern day liberalism.
Did you see it? Do you know what happens to the main character at the end?
It's a FICTIONAL MOVIE... come back with FACTS. Jesus.
You made a claim about the motivation of people in the late 80s and early 90s.
I have offered my personal observations from that time, AND a movie made at that time, that verifies what I have stated about the perceptions of the people of that time, with regard to crack cocaine.
You have offered your unsupported opinion.
If you have not watched it, you should. As an educational period piece.