Why don't you just come out and say that the only thing that would convince you is if the IPCC did a 180°?
It'd save us all a lot of time.
It'd save us all a lot of time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You don't know the half of it....Looks like global communists/eugenicists are already floating trial balloons for the next big doomsday scare.
Time for next eco-scare already?! As Global Warming Movement Collapses, Activists Already 'Test-Marketing' the Next Eco-Fear! 'Laughing Gas' Crisis? Oxygen Crisis? Plastics?
You don't know the half of it....Looks like global communists/eugenicists are already floating trial balloons for the next big doomsday scare.
Time for next eco-scare already?! As Global Warming Movement Collapses, Activists Already 'Test-Marketing' the Next Eco-Fear! 'Laughing Gas' Crisis? Oxygen Crisis? Plastics?
Don't you people know that Dihydrogen Monoxide vapor is the #1 greenhouse gas.
Why don't you just come out and say that the only thing that would convince you is if the IPCC did a 180°?
It'd save us all a lot of time.
You think that the "peers" are going to just come out and say "OK....ya caught us"?
You think that the "peers" are going to just come out and say "OK....ya caught us"?
Members of the climate science community have admitted a couple of mistakes recently, so, yes.
Its as if you don't know how science works. If you want to advance your career the best way to do it is prove that something accepted as truth is false. All the worlds most famous scientists throughout history have been people who established new theories, not those who confirm existing theory. If I was a climate scientist and had any inkling that AGW was wrong I'd be chomping at the bit to prove it.
Here are some steps you can take to overcome your addiction to the fake science of AGW They have helped millions of others, they can help you too!!Why don't you just come out and say that the only thing that would convince you is if the IPCC did a 180°?
It'd save us all a lot of time.
In other words - you don't have any actual published scientific research to back your claims.
Disingenuous to the end.Reducto ad hominem.....Fail.What he is is the warmist cargo cultists' worst nightmare: A former true believer journalist, who looked at the evidence objectively and with an open mind and concluded that AGW is an elaborate hoax.
Anyone who starts their article off with an assertion they are always right is not taking their "journalism" seriously and neither should you or I.
Now, in case you missed it, what source(s) and information would you accept?
And cools the atmosphere.You don't know the half of it....Looks like global communists/eugenicists are already floating trial balloons for the next big doomsday scare.
Time for next eco-scare already?! As Global Warming Movement Collapses, Activists Already 'Test-Marketing' the Next Eco-Fear! 'Laughing Gas' Crisis? Oxygen Crisis? Plastics?
Don't you people know that Dihydrogen Monoxide vapor is the #1 greenhouse gas.
Did you know that when excess H2o is put in the air it precipitates out in a matter of weeks?
Just as I thought. You get everything you know from bloggers. What a fucking moron.
Didn't even look, did ya?
Pretty much.
But the guy does link to other people that have opinions.
Reducto ad hominem.....Fail.
Now, in case you missed it, what source(s) and information would you accept?
Any peer reviewed scientific literature or preprints thereof.
Could you be a little more vague?
You think that the "peers" are going to just come out and say "OK....ya caught us"?
Members of the climate science community have admitted a couple of mistakes recently, so, yes.
Its as if you don't know how science works. If you want to advance your career the best way to do it is prove that something accepted as truth is false. All the worlds most famous scientists throughout history have been people who established new theories, not those who confirm existing theory. If I was a climate scientist and had any inkling that AGW was wrong I'd be chomping at the bit to prove it.
Yeah....Because they got caught red-handed by the independent journalists and bloggers you poo-poo.
This yo-yo
didn't even know his data was bad, because the "peers" working within the AGW echo chamber back-patting club didn't even check it, because it met with their predetermined conclusions.
The wheels are coming off the hoax, Bubba.
In a jar in the lab pickled in formaldehyde.Yeah....Because they got caught red-handed by the independent journalists and bloggers you poo-poo.
This yo-yo
didn't even know his data was bad, because the "peers" working within the AGW echo chamber back-patting club didn't even check it, because it met with their predetermined conclusions.
The wheels are coming off the hoax, Bubba.
My favorite part is this guy telling the press, his people shold have told him it was an error. He's the bigshot scientist, where was his brain?
Just making them fix their polluting cars to license them has been fairly effective. In St. Louis if you keep driving a car which doesn't somehow pass our easy emissions standards you'll eventually get caught and fined. Possibly thrown in jail.How about we cancel cap and trade and just go to limit, regulate and jail. That takes away any plausible reason government could want to fake climate data.
????
You think throwing people in jail can fix the problem better than the free market?