Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A blogger with extensively linked and footnoted (which also contains the computer code) research, you lemming.
But I understand if the information provided blows clean over your head...You warmist cargo cultists aren't the sharpest tools in the shed to begin with.
Yes... let's take obvious sarcasm and humor to be a statement of fact. How disingenuous can you get?james delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything.
rotflmao
What evidence and source(s) would you accept?A blogger with extensively linked and footnoted (which also contains the computer code) research, you lemming.
But I understand if the information provided blows clean over your head...You warmist cargo cultists aren't the sharpest tools in the shed to begin with.
I don't read blogs. If any of the source he quotes are of value, feel free to note them yourself on this thread.
Yes... let's take obvious sarcasm and humor to be a statement of fact.james delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything.
rotflmao
Wow, what an effective conspiracy. They publish their errors online
What he is is the warmist cargo cultists' worst nightmare: A former true believer journalist, who looked at the evidence objectively and with an open mind and concluded that AGW is an elaborate hoax.Yes... let's take obvious sarcasm and humor to be a statement of fact.rotflmao
OK - so he's an entertainer and comedian? Still no reason to take him seriously then.
NASA is faking global warming on purpose?
Right...The "real" NOAA that has been narrowing its field of raw data.
Thanks for that clarification.
What he is is the warmist cargo cultists' worst nightmare: A former true believer journalist, who looked at the evidence objectively and with an open mind and concluded that AGW is an elaborate hoax.Yes... let's take obvious sarcasm and humor to be a statement of fact.
OK - so he's an entertainer and comedian? Still no reason to take him seriously then.
NASA is faking global warming on purpose?
Can we say "Conflict of Interests". They keep the scam going, they keep getting billion dollar research grants, and missions paid for and satellites... They stand to keep the gravy train coming for thousands of employees, and increase their budget.
Right...The "real" NOAA that has been narrowing its field of raw data.
Thanks for that clarification.
You don't even know what the fuck you're talking about.
Reducto ad hominem.....Fail.What he is is the warmist cargo cultists' worst nightmare: A former true believer journalist, who looked at the evidence objectively and with an open mind and concluded that AGW is an elaborate hoax.OK - so he's an entertainer and comedian? Still no reason to take him seriously then.
Anyone who starts their article off with an assertion they are always right is not taking their "journalism" seriously and neither should you or I.
The study, recently published by the free-market Heartland Institute,
Reducto ad hominem.....Fail.What he is is the warmist cargo cultists' worst nightmare: A former true believer journalist, who looked at the evidence objectively and with an open mind and concluded that AGW is an elaborate hoax.
Anyone who starts their article off with an assertion they are always right is not taking their "journalism" seriously and neither should you or I.
Now, in case you missed it, what source(s) and information would you accept?
Reducto ad hominem.....Fail.Anyone who starts their article off with an assertion they are always right is not taking their "journalism" seriously and neither should you or I.
Now, in case you missed it, what source(s) and information would you accept?
Any peer reviewed scientific literature or preprints thereof.
Reducto ad hominem...Irrelevant...Fail.The study, recently published by the free-market Heartland Institute,
I just wanna point out that I'm recovering from a fractured rib. I'd appreciate it very much if you could refrain from saying things, like the above, that make me crack up with uncontrollable laugher, its very painful.
Reducto ad hominem.....Fail.
Now, in case you missed it, what source(s) and information would you accept?
Any peer reviewed scientific literature or preprints thereof.
Could you be a little more vague?