saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
You mean again?
OK, children involved in "gay marriage" are deprived of the complimentary gender as role model and one blood parent 100% of the time. This sets them at a disadvantage to children raised in formative environments who have daily access to both genders as parental role models.
Two childless lesbians may not marry because marriage is an incentive program solely for children. The state has no other reason. And since I've just described how two lesbians don't fit the description of a couple the state wants to incentivize with the PRIVELEGE of marriage (it's not a right) for the best well being of children, two women or two men applying do not cut the muster. Two heteros do, childless or not; so they do not interfere with the standard. The state anticipates statistically that at some point a childless hetero couple will either have their own young or adopt them into a father/mother environment necessary for that child's proper formation of self esteem (his or her gender will always be represented in that home) and social interaction with both genders as the child leaves the home later in life.
Again- how does gay marriage change any of that?
Again- an example
Couple a: 2 lesbians with their 3 children- not married.
Couple b: 2 lesbians with their 3 children- married.
How are the children of Couple b harmed by that marriage?
The only difference is that the children of Couple B have married parents.
So why do you want to deprive the children of homosexuals of having married parents?
Why do you want to deliberately deprive children of a mother or a father? Contrary to Leftist babble, children need both and are at a loss when one is missing. It's terrible when it happens by vicissitude, but doing it on purpose is just cruel.
And you danced and dance away from actually responding to my question- just like Silhouette- just like every homophobe- again:
Again- how does gay marriage change any of that?
Again- an example
Couple a: 2 lesbians with their 3 children- not married.
Couple b: 2 lesbians with their 3 children- married.
How are the children of Couple b harmed by that marriage?
The only difference is that the children of Couple B have married parents.
So why do you want to deprive the children of homosexuals of having married parents?
I just said how children are harmed. You're just being dense.
Unless those children would be with a heterosexual couple if it weren't for gay marriage, how does it harm them? It seems that, without gay marriage, they would either be with a non-married gay couple or possibly remain orphans if we're talking about gay married couples adopting.
Again, if this were a country in which nearly all marriages resulted in children and nearly all of those marriages remained together, if nearly all orphaned children were adopted by heterosexual couples and remained with those couples, etc. this would be a different discussion. But in a country with a decently high divorce rate, plenty of single parents, and, so far as I've ever heard or read, many orphaned children unable to find good homes, how does gay marriage actually hurt children?
You sound like somebody else on this forum. In fact you sound EXACTLY alike, like you're borg clones or something. Maybe I should refer you to the moderators to have them investigate you as a sock puppet.