Couchpotato
Platinum Member
- Mar 2, 2021
- 15,086
- 7,325
- 938
That’s absolutely correct. Zelensky also can’t make the US ever give him another dime or ever support their entrance into NATO. So good luck with that.
Zelenski Says Trump Can't Make Him Negotiate With Russia....Practically Admitting He's Not Trying To End It
- Thread starter mudwhistle
- Start date
That’s absolutely correct. Zelensky also can’t make the US ever give him another dime or ever support their entrance into NATO. So good luck with that.
According to a briefing paper leaked to the Times, Ukraine is about to go rogue by developing its own nukes as U.S. military assistance under President Trump is expected to dwindle.
The Times reported on Nov. 13 that Ukraine could develop a rudimentary nuclear bomb "within months" if U.S. military assistance under President-elect Donald Trump were to cease, according to a briefing paper prepared for the Ukrainian Defense Ministry seen by the outlet.
The report suggests that Ukraine could swiftly build a basic device using plutonium and technology similar to that of the atomic bomb the U.S. dropped on Nagasaki in 1945.
"Creating a simple atomic bomb, as the United States did during the Manhattan Project, would not be a difficult task 80 years later," the document reads.
Foreign Ministry responds to rumors of Kyiv's plans to build nuclear bomb
"Ukraine is committed to the NPT (the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons); we do not possess, develop, or intend to acquire nuclear weapons," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi said via X.kyivindependent.com
Its pretty clear that nobody will allow Ukraine to develop actual nuclear bomb. More likely,it will be one of nuclear states to give them some of their own nukes. May be, it will be a symbolic agony move of Biden (just to throw a hot potato to Trump), but more likely (IMHO) it will be France.
No. They are nice and just warming up. As I said, the main goal of Russia is denazification of Ukraine. And more Nazies are killed in trenches - less of them will survive on liberated territories, and it will be cheaper to retake hearts and minds of survived ex-Ukrainians.
It's not "his" country anymore. First of all, people on those lands already made their choice. Second, he is expired. He is not a "president" anymore. Just an ordinary civilian.
Do you wish to return the USA to the 1820 borders and return Texas to Mexico?
Peoples have right to declare independence when they are discriminated, opressed and/or genocided. If you do recognise the right of Kosovo's Albainians, why don't you recognise the same right of Donbass Russians?
How many other Nazi countries have elected a Jew to lead them? You are just reciting Russian disinformation.
Not true. The referendums were not sanctioned by any international group and are generally accepted to have been fraudulent. The Ukrainians consider him their leader and that is what counts, your opinion means nothing.
Being a Jew doesn't mean to be a Saint. And it doesn't mean that a Jew can't be a Nazi. And yes, the Russians usually use the word "Nazi" in a bit different meaning (mostly as a synonym for the term "Western Barbarian").
It was accepted by the people of Novorussia, and this is the only thing that matters.
Ukrainians consider him as their "leader" only while he has Western money for them. Without western money he'll be overthroned in the matter of weeks (may be, in the matter of days).
So the Russians view Ukrainians as "Western Barbarians"? I guess they intend to subjugate and/or replace Ukrainians with Russians like any great colonial power would do.
In a free and fair referendum?
Thanks for admitting he is still considered the leader of Ukraine by the Ukrainian people.
No. Russians mostly see Ukrainians as Russians, partly corrupted by the colonial government of the Western (basically Polish and German) Barbarians.
Yes. What is even more important - in the free and fair armed fight against Kievan regime.
It depends mostly on your definition of the terms "leader" and "Ukrainian people".
Wow plenty of those 'Russians' are risking their lives to stay independent of you Russians.
Who determined that it was free and fair? The UN or Putin?
I guess we're all Russians we just deny the truth.
Yeah. Some of them. But pretty low number of them are really ideologically motivated. Most of them are just doing their job for money or have no other choice (for borders are closed). NATO hired some traitors in the Russian Boderlands. They are not first, they are not last. After liberation of Ukraine - many of them will serve in Russian Army.
Mushroom
Gold Member
Uh-huh. And tell us about Sudzha? And why going on three years later, Russia has been pushed back quite a bit, and lost a significant amount of not only their military hardware, but their fleet.
Losing your fleet to a nation that does not even have a navy, ouch.
Putin, of course. And, what is more important, Russian people. And was it UN who determined that American Revolutionary War was free and fair?
May be. May be not. We'll see.
Mushroom
Gold Member
Are you even aware that Texas was an independent nation for a decade, right? The Republic of Texas was an independent nation, so what is your point, exactly?
It's not like the US took Texas from Mexico, it had nothing to do with the Texas Revolution.
Is always funny when people who do not know history try to make silly claims.
Was the independence of Texas recognised by UN? I guess no. As well as UN didn't recognise independence of Kosovo, South Ossetia or Donbass (which also was an independent nation for 8 years).
Actually, there are plenty of similarities between Texas Revolution+American-Mexican war and "Russian spring+Russian-Ukrainian war".
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Report on Helicopter causing the accident in January- Started by Robert W
- Replies: 0
-
-
Parents, teachers say Toronto schools already struggling as board mulls big cuts- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 0
-
Democrats Warn Cutting State Propaganda Will Lead To Fascism- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 4
