Yup, I'm going to go there. I'm going to use the "I" word.

1. AS we have learned, impeachment only matters if your party controls the Senate in sufficient numbers to pass it.
2. Trump's declining health is such that a 25th Amendment issue may be more likely.
~~~~~~>
Indeed, the Democrat Left proved that to be true when America wanted to impeach Clinton for lying and perjury.
 
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​


One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'​


........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.

Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines​


As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.

‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals​


What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?
Wrong was done him so he will settle up on that
It’s how the real world operates
 
Actually, they don't as Nixon painfully discovered after the Saturday Night Massacre.........one of the events leading to his resignation.


He fired them, they served at his pleasure.

The so-called massacre had nothing to do with his resignation.
 
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​


One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'​


........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.

Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines​


As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.

‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals​


What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?
What a completely unpersuasive bit of bullshit.

Typical of bug.
 
1. AS we have learned, impeachment only matters if your party controls the Senate in sufficient numbers to pass it.
2. Trump's declining health is such that a 25th Amendment issue may be more likely.
Trump's declining health is such that a 25th Amendment issue may be more likely.
when he gets WORSE than Biden, I have no problem with that.
 
Of course you are! Your retarded Democrats have already wasted our time and money on two phony impeachments, why not 3? Or 4? Go for it, it's not like they any other responsibilities other than bash Trump.
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?
 
Wrong was done him so he will settle up on that
It’s how the real world operates
My apologies. I should have prefaced my hypothetical by asking that no one go down the road of specious whataboutisms or factually inaccurate analogies. The exercise is to simply look at the facts I've laid out and answer why they don't warrant impeachment?
 
~~~~~~>
Indeed, the Democrat Left proved that to be true when America wanted to impeach Clinton for lying and perjury.
My apologies. I should have prefaced my hypothetical by asking that no one go down the road of specious whataboutisms or factually inaccurate analogies. The exercise is to simply look at the facts I've laid out and answer why they don't warrant impeachment?
 
My apologies. I should have prefaced my hypothetical by asking that no one go down the road of specious whataboutisms or factually inaccurate analogies. The exercise is to simply look at the facts I've laid out and answer why they don't warrant impeachment?
When in a debate, trying to lay out the parameters of the reply is used to box in the respondent to get the answer you want.
 
~~~~~~>
Indeed, the Democrat Left proved that to be true when America wanted to impeach Clinton for lying and perjury.
Let me see if I can help by starting a sentence for you. "I don't believe what prez X did rises to the level of an impeachable offense because....................................................."

Please fill in the blank.
 
Last edited:
When in a debate, trying to lay out the parameters of the reply is used to box in the respondent to get the answer you want.
Nope. It's designed to keep the respondents on topic.

Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?
 
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​


One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'​


........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.

Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines​


As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.

‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals​


What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?

You probably shouldn't have shot him, huh?
 
Maybe, following a precedent set by shithead lying Democrat shills, like Nancy Pelousy and Pencil Neck Schifty, the GOP House should now impeach former President Potato.
 
15th post
Nope. It's designed to keep the respondents on topic.

Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?
Because the question is designed to make one side look bad, while ignoring the actions of the other.
 
1. AS we have learned, impeachment only matters if your party controls the Senate in sufficient numbers to pass it.
2. Trump's declining health is such that a 25th Amendment issue may be more likely.
If the 25th wasn’t imposed on Biden, I doubt it will be used.
 
Because the question is designed to make one side look bad, while ignoring the actions of the other.
"The actions of the other side" are immaterial to the question........Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

Are you disputing any of the facts I laid out?
 
Back
Top Bottom