Young Lady Says Low IQ Savages Are Turning The Earth Into the Planet of the Apes.

[Snouter]

 

[ScienceRocks]

This includes religious idiots that wish to shit on science and turn this country into a third world country.

 

[DGS49]

This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.

It doesn't bode well for the future.

 

[DarkFury]

This includes religious idiots that wish to shit on science and turn this country into a third world country.

She was talking about you!

 

[IM2]

This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.

It doesn't bode well for the future.

Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.

 

[DarkFury]

This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.

It doesn't bode well for the future.

Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.

We need to get that damn negro blood out of the gene pool. Studies show darkie blood destroys any other race.

 

[IM2]

This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.

It doesn't bode well for the future.

Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.

We need to get that damn negro blood out of the gene pool. Studies show darkie blood destroys any other race.

YAWN!

With people like you as a part of it, the white race is partially destroyed as it is.

 

[bodecea]

This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.

It doesn't bode well for the future.

Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.

We need to get that damn negro blood out of the gene pool. Studies show darkie blood destroys any other race.

Can't have them all with IQs of 214, eh?

 

[IM2]

This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.

It doesn't bode well for the future.

Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.

We need to get that damn negro blood out of the gene pool. Studies show darkie blood destroys any other race.

Can't have them all with IQs of 214, eh?

Doesn't appear that we can.

 

[Paul Essien]

If you are trying to ground IQ as a genetic product of race. The very first thing you need to do is offer up a genetic definition of race.

Something no one has done. Nor done nor has any study.

But I’ll sit back, and invite you to give me a definition. Mainly because your pathetic attempts to define race will point out just how subjective such definitions are. In close to a decade of debating race and IQ with people like you.

I have yet to see any one of them, no matter what their scientific credentials (I repeat) no matter what their scientific credentials - offer up an acceptably neutral definition of race.

It's not enough to say "Blacks have a lower IQ. Now prove me wrong"

• You have to show that human variation is great enough to account for differences of IQ.
• You have to show that the veracity of IQ as a legitimate measurement.
• You have to show and provided an inextricable link between genetics, race, and IQ outside of methodologically flawed correlations.

If you are saying that black IQ is lower because blacks are “naturally” less intelligent.

That's an exceptionally radical statement. So you're going to need exceptionally radical proof to back it up.

Alfred Binet created IQ test to see which children weren’t profiting from the Parisian school system (not so that they could be labeled stupid) so new educational programs could be created to help those children.

Even back then he was afraid that his tests would be misused for the wrong reasons and he He must have been psychic because once certain people got a hold of it, they took on a whole new meaning.

And let's look at the people who try promote HBD (Human Bio-Diversity)

• Steve Sailer, journalist/computer salesman.
• J. Philippe Rushton, psychologist.
• Francis Fukuyama, political economist.
• Steve Hsu, astrophysicist.
• Richard Herrnstein, psychologist.
• Charles Murray, political scientist (Author of Bell Curve)
• Arthur Jensen, psychology professor. (Author of Bell Curve)

You notice anything strange?

No biologists. No anthropologists. No neurologists. No geneticists in sight.

But yet you take there words of youtuber over people who study these things for a living ?

And that's why in neurology no one takes IQ seriously.

It is archaic and only really useful to social scientists. And people like you who need simple explanations for complex things.

Neurologists have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important.

Because the public is only concerned with what feels like it should be true rather than what is actually the case in reality.

 

[IM2]

If you are trying to ground IQ as a genetic product of race. The very first thing you need to do is offer up a genetic definition of race.

Something no one has done. Nor done nor has any study.

But I’ll sit back, and invite you to give me a definition. Mainly because your pathetic attempts to define race will point out just how subjective such definitions are. In close to a decade of debating race and IQ with people like you.

I have yet to see any one of them, no matter what their scientific credentials (I repeat) no matter what their scientific credentials - offer up an acceptably neutral definition of race.

It's not enough to say "Blacks have a lower IQ. Now prove me wrong"

• You have to show that human variation is great enough to account for differences of IQ.
• You have to show that the veracity of IQ as a legitimate measurement.
• You have to show and provided an inextricable link between genetics, race, and IQ outside of methodologically flawed correlations.

If you are saying that black IQ is lower because blacks are “naturally” less intelligent.

That's an exceptionally radical statement. So you're going to need exceptionally radical proof to back it up.

Alfred Binet created IQ test to see which children weren’t profiting from the Parisian school system (not so that they could be labeled stupid) so new educational programs could be created to help those children.

Even back then he was afraid that his tests would be misused for the wrong reasons and he He must have been psychic because once certain people got a hold of it, they took on a whole new meaning.

And let's look at the people who try promote HBD (Human Bio-Diversity)

• Steve Sailer, journalist/computer salesman.
• J. Philippe Rushton, psychologist.
• Francis Fukuyama, political economist.
• Steve Hsu, astrophysicist.
• Richard Herrnstein, psychologist.
• Charles Murray, political scientist (Author of Bell Curve)
• Arthur Jensen, psychology professor. (Author of Bell Curve)

You notice anything strange?

No biologists. No anthropologists. No neurologists. No geneticists in sight.

But yet you take there words of youtuber over people who study these things for a living ?

And that's why in neurology no one takes IQ seriously.

It is archaic and only really useful to social scientists. And people like you who need simple explanations for complex things.

Neurologists have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important.

Because the public is only concerned with what feels like it should be true rather than what is actually the case in reality.

This is a tremendous post. Thank you.

 

[sjay]

If you are trying to ground IQ as a genetic product of race. The very first thing you need to do is offer up a genetic definition of race.

Something no one has done. Nor done nor has any study.

But I’ll sit back, and invite you to give me a definition. Mainly because your pathetic attempts to define race will point out just how subjective such definitions are. In close to a decade of debating race and IQ with people like you.

I have yet to see any one of them, no matter what their scientific credentials (I repeat) no matter what their scientific credentials - offer up an acceptably neutral definition of race.

It's not enough to say "Blacks have a lower IQ. Now prove me wrong"

• You have to show that human variation is great enough to account for differences of IQ.
• You have to show that the veracity of IQ as a legitimate measurement.
• You have to show and provided an inextricable link between genetics, race, and IQ outside of methodologically flawed correlations.

If you are saying that black IQ is lower because blacks are “naturally” less intelligent.

That's an exceptionally radical statement. So you're going to need exceptionally radical proof to back it up.

Alfred Binet created IQ test to see which children weren’t profiting from the Parisian school system (not so that they could be labeled stupid) so new educational programs could be created to help those children.

Even back then he was afraid that his tests would be misused for the wrong reasons and he He must have been psychic because once certain people got a hold of it, they took on a whole new meaning.

And let's look at the people who try promote HBD (Human Bio-Diversity)

• Steve Sailer, journalist/computer salesman.
• J. Philippe Rushton, psychologist.
• Francis Fukuyama, political economist.
• Steve Hsu, astrophysicist.
• Richard Herrnstein, psychologist.
• Charles Murray, political scientist (Author of Bell Curve)
• Arthur Jensen, psychology professor. (Author of Bell Curve)

You notice anything strange?

No biologists. No anthropologists. No neurologists. No geneticists in sight.

But yet you take there words of youtuber over people who study these things for a living ?

And that's why in neurology no one takes IQ seriously.

It is archaic and only really useful to social scientists. And people like you who need simple explanations for complex things.

Neurologists have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important.

Because the public is only concerned with what feels like it should be true rather than what is actually the case in reality.[/QUO

Human history has progressed with electricity-white male
telephone-white male
automobile-white male
air travel-white male
computers-white male

 

[Paul Essien]

Human history has progressed with electricity-white male
telephone-white male
automobile-white male
air travel-white male
computers-white male

Sure white men invented things.

But at the same time 99.99% of white men have invented nothing.

So called western contributions are not because white people are so much smarter than everyone else but because progress in science and invention is built on what has gone before.

The more science you know the more science you can discover. The more inventions you have at hand. The more new inventions you can come up with. That is why the progress is exponential. It comes from the nature of science and technology, not white male intelligence.

Not to mention the fact that white men would be nowhere with the 4 Chinese inventions

1) Gunpowder
2) The compass
3) Paper
4) Printing press.

Their rise to world power was built on these. In fact before 1500 there were very few white male inventions.

If you want to take in all of human history, that is the 100 thousand years modern man has been on the planet, not just the last 300 years where Northern white Europeans have got their act together, then the Egyptians are by far the most inventive.

They invented stuff like, oh, civilization. They have been on top for 40% of human history, more than twice as long as whites. A good fraction of what we think of as “Greek” is Egyptian. Egypt is African. In the past it was much blacker than it is now.

Africans were the original inventors of the disciplines that helped bring the world into the technological age. Mathematics, physics, astronomy, building in stone and bricks, metallurgy and all the root subjects that were necessary to push the world into today's modern age, were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.

Therefore, even if people of European origins have made improvements in ancient technologies and ancient inventions, such as rocketry, computer technology, aerodynamics and others, the basic mathematical formulas and ancient prototypes were invented by Africans.

For example, the Africans invented the binary system which is still used in the Yoruba oracle and was copied by German scientists and applied to computer programming. Many ancient formulas in trigonometry, calculus and physics as well as chemistry (Khem mysteries) came from the scientific discoveries in Egypt and Nubia-Kush.

True, many inventions of the past few hundred years were made by white men. But that is only because white men have been on top during that time.

If it was because white men are born with more brains, then white men would have been on top all throughout history, not just a fifth of it.

Anglo power – British and American – is fresh in our minds, but it is merely the latest chapter in the book of history and bear in mind it's white men who write the history books and whether the inventions are truly white is very dubious. As it's not about who invents but who get's the patent.

And that is the Historical Context that your argument forgets.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.

.

Egyptians weren't, and aren't authentic Blacks, neither are Indus Valley, or Mesopotamia, or Sabea.
Nubians are rather Black, but they do mostly have J haplogroups like Arabs apparently.

You left out some early cultures of Europe, like the Vinca Culture, or the Cucenti-Trypillian Culture

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

And let's look at the people who try promote HBD (Human Bio-Diversity)

• Steve Sailer, journalist/computer salesman.
• J. Philippe Rushton, psychologist.
• Francis Fukuyama, political economist.
• Steve Hsu, astrophysicist.
• Richard Herrnstein, psychologist.
• Charles Murray, political scientist (Author of Bell Curve)
• Arthur Jensen, psychology professor. (Author of Bell Curve)

You notice anything strange?

No biologists. No anthropologists. No neurologists. No geneticists in sight.

James Watson, Francis Crick, and even to a lesser extent Richard Dawkins have all expressed anti-egalitarian views of race.

Sure, maybe not to the extent of Rushton, or Jensen, and others you listed.

However, looking at how James Watson was reacted to for exposing the inconvenient truth of Africa not being equal, and risked his career for it.
So, it's not really surprising that more aren't speaking out on racial inequalities.

On the inverse, Rushton, and Jensen actually made their names by promoting racial inequality.

So, yes it's not exactly the same.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Egypt is African. In the past it was much blacker than it is now.

So, how come the DNA evidence says otherwise?

Eurogenes Blog: Ancient Egyptians less Sub-Saharan than present-day Egyptians

 

[Paul Essien]

were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.

.

Egyptians weren't, and aren't authentic Blacks, neither are Indus Valley, or Mesopotamia, or Sabea.
Nubians are rather Black, but they do mostly have J haplogroups like Arabs apparently.

You left out some early cultures of Europe, like the Vinca Culture, or the Cucenti-Trypillian Culture

Egyptians were black.

The “Blacks never developed a civilization” is one of the biggest myths out there but that may be true if you get your history from Stormfront.

Egypt was first settled by black people. They built the first civilization with time other people came in from other areas of the world because they heard of its glory. Those who decided to settle married the indigenous people and with time some of them became light skinned.

People have a reason to downplay the blackness of ancient Egypt - While blacks have reason to play it up – because if civilization goes all the way back to Egypt and if it turned out to be founded by black people.......what would that say ?

Reconstructions :

Using high-powered computers, experts can now get a rough idea of how someone looked from their skull. They make a living at it by doing it for the police for murder cases. When the same thing is done to the skulls of King Tut and Queen Nefertiti, here is what you got :

What they said in ancient times ::

• Herodotus said Egyptians had black skin and woolly hair, which is how he said the Ethiopians looked too.
• Aristotle called both the Ethiopians and Egyptians black.
• The Bible calls both the Ethiopians and Egyptians sons of Ham.
• They called themselves kemet - “black”

What the DNA says :

Present-day Egyptians are, by blood, about 60% Eurasian, like the Arabs who took over their country, and 40% black African. In the past they were, if anything, blacker because since the glory days of Ancient Egypt they have been taken over by the Persians, Greeks, Romans and Arabs.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.

.

Egyptians weren't, and aren't authentic Blacks, neither are Indus Valley, or Mesopotamia, or Sabea.
Nubians are rather Black, but they do mostly have J haplogroups like Arabs apparently.

You left out some early cultures of Europe, like the Vinca Culture, or the Cucenti-Trypillian Culture

Egyptians were black.

The “Blacks never developed a civilization” is one of the biggest myths out there but that may be true if you get your history from Stormfront.

Egypt was first settled by black people. They built the first civilization with time other people came in from other areas of the world because they heard of its glory. Those who decided to settle married the indigenous people and with time some of them became light skinned.

People have a reason to downplay the blackness of ancient Egypt - While blacks have reason to play it up – because if civilization goes all the way back to Egypt and if it turned out to be founded by black people.......what would that say ?

Reconstructions :

Using high-powered computers, experts can now get a rough idea of how someone looked from their skull. They make a living at it by doing it for the police for murder cases. When the same thing is done to the skulls of King Tut and Queen Nefertiti, here is what you got :

What they said in ancient times ::

• Herodotus said Egyptians had black skin and woolly hair, which is how he said the Ethiopians looked too.
• Aristotle called both the Ethiopians and Egyptians black.
• The Bible calls both the Ethiopians and Egyptians sons of Ham.
• They called themselves kemet - “black”

What the DNA says :

Present-day Egyptians are, by blood, about 60% Eurasian, like the Arabs who took over their country, and 40% black African. In the past they were, if anything, blacker because since the glory days of Ancient Egypt they have been taken over by the Persians, Greeks, Romans and Arabs.

They found that ancient Egyptians were closely related to Anatolian and Neolithic European populations, as well showing strong genetic traces from the Levant areas in the near east (Turkey, Lebanon).


This genetic ancestry stands apart from more modern Egyptians who share around 8 percent of their DNA with Sub-Saharan African populations. The data offers a fascinating insight into a prolonged period where ancient Egyptian ancestry did not mix with its southern African counterparts. It also suggests that this gene flow into modern Egyptian populations occurred relatively recently, within the past 1,500 years.

Ancient mummy DNA reveals surprises about genetic origins of Egyptians

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.

.

Egyptians weren't, and aren't authentic Blacks, neither are Indus Valley, or Mesopotamia, or Sabea.
Nubians are rather Black, but they do mostly have J haplogroups like Arabs apparently.

You left out some early cultures of Europe, like the Vinca Culture, or the Cucenti-Trypillian Culture

Egypt was first settled by black people. They built the first civilization with time other people came in from other areas of the world because they heard of its glory.

Civilization, or perhaps what we can call proto-Civilization, probably stems from Göktepe in Anatolia.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

In fact before 1500 there were very few white male inventions.

If you want to take in all of human history, that is the 100 thousand years modern man has been on the planet, not just the last 300 years where Northern white Europeans have got their act together, then the Egyptians are by far the most inventive.

Compare the population sizes of Ancient Egypt, to some Northern Europeans.

4,000 years ago Ancient Egypt had 1 million people.

Britain, and Poland respectably didn't reach 1 million until about 1,000 years ago.

Scandinavia didn't reach 1 million until about 500 years ago