Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.
It doesn't bode well for the future.
We need to get that damn negro blood out of the gene pool. Studies show darkie blood destroys any other race.This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.
It doesn't bode well for the future.
Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.
We need to get that damn negro blood out of the gene pool. Studies show darkie blood destroys any other race.This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.
It doesn't bode well for the future.
Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.
Can't have them all with IQs of 214, eh?We need to get that damn negro blood out of the gene pool. Studies show darkie blood destroys any other race.This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.
It doesn't bode well for the future.
Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.
Can't have them all with IQs of 214, eh?We need to get that damn negro blood out of the gene pool. Studies show darkie blood destroys any other race.This girl doesn't sound particularly bright, but she is on to something. The REAL regrettable thing in our "Black" community is that the African-American high-achievers are both delaying and shunning having children, while the dregs are popping out kids like rabbits. And the vast majority of those "rabbits" are growing up fatherless.
It doesn't bode well for the future.
Well the problem with this is high achieving parents do not always mean high achieving kids.
If you are trying to ground IQ as a genetic product of race. The very first thing you need to do is offer up a genetic definition of race.
Something no one has done. Nor done nor has any study.
But I’ll sit back, and invite you to give me a definition. Mainly because your pathetic attempts to define race will point out just how subjective such definitions are. In close to a decade of debating race and IQ with people like you.
I have yet to see any one of them, no matter what their scientific credentials (I repeat) no matter what their scientific credentials - offer up an acceptably neutral definition of race.
It's not enough to say "Blacks have a lower IQ. Now prove me wrong"
- You have to show that human variation is great enough to account for differences of IQ.
- You have to show that the veracity of IQ as a legitimate measurement.
- You have to show and provided an inextricable link between genetics, race, and IQ outside of methodologically flawed correlations.
If you are saying that black IQ is lower because blacks are “naturally” less intelligent.
That's an exceptionally radical statement. So you're going to need exceptionally radical proof to back it up.
Alfred Binet created IQ test to see which children weren’t profiting from the Parisian school system (not so that they could be labeled stupid) so new educational programs could be created to help those children.
Even back then he was afraid that his tests would be misused for the wrong reasons and he He must have been psychic because once certain people got a hold of it, they took on a whole new meaning.
And let's look at the people who try promote HBD (Human Bio-Diversity)
You notice anything strange?
- Steve Sailer, journalist/computer salesman.
- J. Philippe Rushton, psychologist.
- Francis Fukuyama, political economist.
- Steve Hsu, astrophysicist.
- Richard Herrnstein, psychologist.
- Charles Murray, political scientist (Author of Bell Curve)
- Arthur Jensen, psychology professor. (Author of Bell Curve)
No biologists. No anthropologists. No neurologists. No geneticists in sight.
But yet you take there words of youtuber over people who study these things for a living ?
And that's why in neurology no one takes IQ seriously.
It is archaic and only really useful to social scientists. And people like you who need simple explanations for complex things.
Neurologists have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important.
Because the public is only concerned with what feels like it should be true rather than what is actually the case in reality.
If you are trying to ground IQ as a genetic product of race. The very first thing you need to do is offer up a genetic definition of race.
Something no one has done. Nor done nor has any study.
But I’ll sit back, and invite you to give me a definition. Mainly because your pathetic attempts to define race will point out just how subjective such definitions are. In close to a decade of debating race and IQ with people like you.
I have yet to see any one of them, no matter what their scientific credentials (I repeat) no matter what their scientific credentials - offer up an acceptably neutral definition of race.
It's not enough to say "Blacks have a lower IQ. Now prove me wrong"
- You have to show that human variation is great enough to account for differences of IQ.
- You have to show that the veracity of IQ as a legitimate measurement.
- You have to show and provided an inextricable link between genetics, race, and IQ outside of methodologically flawed correlations.
If you are saying that black IQ is lower because blacks are “naturally” less intelligent.
That's an exceptionally radical statement. So you're going to need exceptionally radical proof to back it up.
Alfred Binet created IQ test to see which children weren’t profiting from the Parisian school system (not so that they could be labeled stupid) so new educational programs could be created to help those children.
Even back then he was afraid that his tests would be misused for the wrong reasons and he He must have been psychic because once certain people got a hold of it, they took on a whole new meaning.
And let's look at the people who try promote HBD (Human Bio-Diversity)
You notice anything strange?
- Steve Sailer, journalist/computer salesman.
- J. Philippe Rushton, psychologist.
- Francis Fukuyama, political economist.
- Steve Hsu, astrophysicist.
- Richard Herrnstein, psychologist.
- Charles Murray, political scientist (Author of Bell Curve)
- Arthur Jensen, psychology professor. (Author of Bell Curve)
No biologists. No anthropologists. No neurologists. No geneticists in sight.
But yet you take there words of youtuber over people who study these things for a living ?
And that's why in neurology no one takes IQ seriously.
It is archaic and only really useful to social scientists. And people like you who need simple explanations for complex things.
Neurologists have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important.
Because the public is only concerned with what feels like it should be true rather than what is actually the case in reality.[/QUO
Human history has progressed with electricity-white male
telephone-white male
automobile-white male
air travel-white male
computers-white male
Human history has progressed with electricity-white male
telephone-white male
automobile-white male
air travel-white male
computers-white male
were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.
.
And let's look at the people who try promote HBD (Human Bio-Diversity)
You notice anything strange?
- Steve Sailer, journalist/computer salesman.
- J. Philippe Rushton, psychologist.
- Francis Fukuyama, political economist.
- Steve Hsu, astrophysicist.
- Richard Herrnstein, psychologist.
- Charles Murray, political scientist (Author of Bell Curve)
- Arthur Jensen, psychology professor. (Author of Bell Curve)
No biologists. No anthropologists. No neurologists. No geneticists in sight.
Egypt is African. In the past it was much blacker than it is now.
were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.
.
Egyptians weren't, and aren't authentic Blacks, neither are Indus Valley, or Mesopotamia, or Sabea.
Nubians are rather Black, but they do mostly have J haplogroups like Arabs apparently.
You left out some early cultures of Europe, like the Vinca Culture, or the Cucenti-Trypillian Culture
were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.
.
Egyptians weren't, and aren't authentic Blacks, neither are Indus Valley, or Mesopotamia, or Sabea.
Nubians are rather Black, but they do mostly have J haplogroups like Arabs apparently.
You left out some early cultures of Europe, like the Vinca Culture, or the Cucenti-Trypillian Culture
Egyptians were black.
The “Blacks never developed a civilization” is one of the biggest myths out there but that may be true if you get your history from Stormfront.
Egypt was first settled by black people. They built the first civilization with time other people came in from other areas of the world because they heard of its glory. Those who decided to settle married the indigenous people and with time some of them became light skinned.
People have a reason to downplay the blackness of ancient Egypt - While blacks have reason to play it up – because if civilization goes all the way back to Egypt and if it turned out to be founded by black people.......what would that say ?
Reconstructions :
Using high-powered computers, experts can now get a rough idea of how someone looked from their skull. They make a living at it by doing it for the police for murder cases. When the same thing is done to the skulls of King Tut and Queen Nefertiti, here is what you got :
What they said in ancient times ::
What the DNA says :
- Herodotus said Egyptians had black skin and woolly hair, which is how he said the Ethiopians looked too.
- Aristotle called both the Ethiopians and Egyptians black.
- The Bible calls both the Ethiopians and Egyptians sons of Ham.
- They called themselves kemet - “black”
Present-day Egyptians are, by blood, about 60% Eurasian, like the Arabs who took over their country, and 40% black African. In the past they were, if anything, blacker because since the glory days of Ancient Egypt they have been taken over by the Persians, Greeks, Romans and Arabs.
were begun by in Egypt, Nubia-Kush, Mesopotamia, Sabea and Black Naga India.
.
Egyptians weren't, and aren't authentic Blacks, neither are Indus Valley, or Mesopotamia, or Sabea.
Nubians are rather Black, but they do mostly have J haplogroups like Arabs apparently.
You left out some early cultures of Europe, like the Vinca Culture, or the Cucenti-Trypillian Culture
Egypt was first settled by black people. They built the first civilization with time other people came in from other areas of the world because they heard of its glory.
In fact before 1500 there were very few white male inventions.
If you want to take in all of human history, that is the 100 thousand years modern man has been on the planet, not just the last 300 years where Northern white Europeans have got their act together, then the Egyptians are by far the most inventive.