You continually crow about the IPCC's 'peer reviewed' findings, which are published for review and comment by other experts with the same or differing views, often challenging the published articles findings. I think that's how the scientific process is supposed to work, you know, debate and challenge or support the 'peer reviewed' articles.What I like talking about is science and how stupid the lot of you all are.
Can you list the peer reviews from what you have labeled 'climate deniers' with opposite views supported by their facts and findings?