Zoom
Rookie
- Nov 14, 2011
- 2,215
- 286
- 0
- Banned
- #281
First the police video came out which appeared to show Zimmerman with no marks. I bought into it. Yet when the enhance the video using digital enhancements there is a MAJOR and very large mark on the back of his head. Those marks could only be made by a significant blow or blows!
Enhanced Video Of Zimmerman In Police Station Appears To Show Injuries | Fox News
Why is it people think if he was injured, it proves he was right in shooting that kid. It seems to me, that kid had the right to defend himself against a guy with a gun.
Good for him. At least he had that.
Why is it that you are so stuck on stupid that you can't see that the fact of an injury to the back of Zimmerman's head MIGHT constitute credible (honest) evidence that he only fired the gun to save himself?
And if that's what happened, good for him. At least he came out of it alive.
Too bad for Trayvon (if that is the way it went down). For he need not have died if he had not turned violent.
Zimmerman stalked that kid, chased him, approached him and got into a fight for it. It looks like the kid kicked his ass, then was shot for it. That kid had the right to defend himself. He was standing his ground, he was just not armed unfortunatly.
How is this a good shoot in your mind?