Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Landlords don't buy from business owners?
The posting here isn't for effect on the governor. It is to further display the essence of the problem. As for your idea about government, in some cases you are right. In other cases you are dead wrong.Do you really think that people in high level positions in government actually read the letters from constituents?
Sorry pal, but if you’re looking to the government to solve any of your problems, you are looking in the wrong place.
Yes, the socialist/communist cities and states have them.Also, 5 states have rent control laws, controlling rents. Dozens of cities have them also.
So do AMERICAN cities and states, in accordance with the capitalist/socialist society that we are.Yes, the socialist/communist cities and states have them.
That is why they need to be upgraded. It doesn't matter if they are expensive, they are going to generate revenue to offset the cost. All of our Post ports need to be upgraded for modern times.The ports are operating at capacity now. It would be hugely expensive to expand them. And the additional revenue would be years away.
You miss the point of all those persons with 30k to spend. Even taxing only one percent would generate $300 in general taxes from all those millions of persons.Yes, they would be paid to do nothing, while others work 40+ hours a week to live. Whether the capital circulates or not is irrelevant. You making it sound as though it were a good investment for the economy ignores the damages done to pay for it.
Soaking the tax payers for $2.5 billion just so people can live a good life without working is simply immoral. You require others to work so you can sit on your ass. And then have the audacity to demand that there be no means testing? lol Start buying lottery tickets. Your chances are better.
Fuck you too, scumbag.
View attachment 566454
Those business owners who sell to landlords are a drop in the bucket compared to all business owners (who are suffering losses from huge drops of disposable income > ie, SALES$$$) And those business owners who DO sell to landlords are ALSO losing sales, because their sales to landlords will stay the same, but sales to everyone else will drop.
99% of businesses will suffer. Sorry to disappoint. I don't snow easily.
Also, 5 states have rent control laws, controlling rents. Dozens of cities have them also.
So do AMERICAN cities and states, in accordance with the capitalist/socialist society that we are.
The posting here isn't for effect on the governor. It is to further display the essence of the problem. As for your idea about government, in some cases you are right. In other cases you are dead wrong.
A few years ago, I was having trouble contacting the Florida Dept of Children & Families. For a month & a half, couldn't get them on the phone. I called then state representitive Sean Harrison's office. Spoke to an aide. The NEXT DAY, I got a call back from DCF.
Also, 5 states have rent control laws, controlling rents. Dozens of cities have them also.
That is why they need to be upgraded. It doesn't matter if they are expensive, they are going to generate revenue to offset the cost. All of our Post ports need to be upgraded for modern times.
Those are two separate issues and we could issue "junk" bonds to cover both since we already know how we are going to generate revenue to pay for it.I agree they need to be upgraded. But I think you want the upgrade to facilitate your fantasy of getting paid $31,200 for doing nothing.
And yes, the revenue will offset the cost, but not for decades.
Because the postal system has never operated efficiently, it’s always wasted money. The smartest thing the government could do would be to eliminate the subsidies to the postal service and open all mail delivery to competition from carriers like UPS and FEDEX. To survive the postal service would have to get rid of its deadwood.Upgrading Postal service operations first can help provide demand and supply considerations along with metrics for optimization for a more cost effective general rollout.
And, since the general government has to do it anyway, why not optimize the postal service to help reduce costs for the private sector while generating revenue?
Your opinion doesn't matter.Because the postal system has never operated efficiently, it’s always wasted money. The smartest thing the government could do would be to eliminate the subsidies to the postal service and open all mail delivery to competition from carriers like UPS and FEDEX. To survive the postal service would have to get rid of its deadwood.
Upgrading Postal service operations first can help provide demand and supply considerations along with metrics for optimization for a more cost effective general rollout.
And, since the general government has to do it anyway, why not optimize the postal service to help reduce costs for the private sector while generating revenue?
That is the whole point of the upgrade, to generate revenue. Only right-wingers seem to eschew Capitalism every time it comes up.Because the USPS is already losing enough money. No politician will bring forward a bill costing hundreds of billions of dollars for something that will not show a profit during his career.
That is the whole point of the upgrade, to generate revenue. Only right-wingers seem to eschew Capitalism every time it comes up.
Only right-wingers have a problem increasing tax revenue by increasing the tax base, rendering rent control unnecessary in modern capital times, and solving simple poverty in a market friendly manner.Revenue? And you would happily give it to those who had no part in earning it.
