Yes, Dems Really Believe a Few Dozen Unarmed Trespassers Almost Overthrew the US Government

[meaner gene]

Oh please, Berg! There is no way on God's green earth Sussmann was EVER going to be convicted of anything with a jury pulled from Washington DC in a trial overseen by a liberal judge! The only sham was that trial.

Hold that same trial with an impartial judge anywhere in the "fly over" States and Sussmann is begging for a plea deal!

Then I guess the lesson is for democrats to avoid the flyover states.

 

[easyt65]

Like can you show us this so-called 'resistance'?
I kinda think it is more a bit of paranoic imagination than reality.
But, l'll keep an open mind.
Show us the resistance that is vexing you so much.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"criminal failed impeachments"??
C'mon, poster 'eastyt', 'criminal'?
I know you are vexed by the impeachments, vexed by the Committee investigating January 6th, I get it.
But hyperbolic screeching really ain't helping your credibility or helping your imagined cause.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Do this, poster 'easyt65', sit down in front of your telly on Thursday. Watch the hearings with keen interest and sincere intent. And an open mind. Maybe then you can hear or see whether all of your "Why haven'ts"....get addressed.
Good luck.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mine too.
So maybe both of us can be relieved that this long investigation is finishing up and sharing what they have found. Let the chips fall where they may. May those responsible have the consequences laid at their door.
Tomorrow's televised hearings should be interesting for you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Your kids do that? Sheeeesh!!
Beat the hell out of cops with iron rods? Taser 'em? Spray 'em in the face with MACE? Smash window? Doors? Steal laptops?
Smear their poo on the walls? (just how old are they? were they, or they, being competently potty-trained?)

Gawd, you ramble on and on, spewing shit you know nothing about.

Let's talk about the 1st stupid thing you said to me -

Yes, I said 'Failed CRIMINAL Impeachment'

Pelosi vowed not to allow the Impeachment to move forward unless she had 2 things:
1. Bipartisanship
2. Undeniable Evidence

SHE LIED - SHE HAD NEITHER
- She had no bipartisan participation
- She had no evidence

During the Impeachment she and Democratds proved they had ZERO CRIME, ZERO EVIDENCE, & ZERO WITNESSES

- Pelosi actually finally admitted there was no crime, declaring no crime was needed to Impeach a President

- The only witness the Democrats claimed to have was a proven non-existent whistleblower Democrat Intel Committee Chairman Adam Schiff claimed he had, had spent tome talking to, etc... ONLY to have it come out he perjured himself and that the witness did NOT exist

-The only 'evidence' Democrats claimed to have and submitted as actual evidence was a criminally manufactured false transcript of a Trump phone call. WTF was Schiff thinking? The actual transcript had been released...and the next day he tried to submit his manufactured version.

Needless to say Schiff was caught criminally, seditiously, treasonously manufacturing false evidence against the President of the United States in an attempt to remove him from office (also known as a COUP ATTEMPT).
- Democrats, if course protected him and Schiff was never held a countable for his treason

During Pelosi's 2nd failed Impeachment coup attempt, ChiCom Spy-fu@ker Fang Fang Swalwe was caught manufacturing false evidence as well, photo-shopping a Trump Tweet / message.

Like Schiff, Swalwrll was caught treasonously, criminally manufacturing ufacturing false evidence against a President of the United States.

Also like Schiff, Swalwell was protected and was never held accountable fr his crime / treason

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[toobfreak]

All claims with no actual evidence to support them

Right, which is why they just released a 90 minute documentary covering just one small aspect of them.

 

[Lesh]

Right, which is why they just released a 90 minute documentary covering just one small aspect of them.

And what would that be?

 

[Chillicothe]

SHE LIED - SHE HAD NEITHER
- She had no bipartisan participation (umm, she did. She had enough to impeach him.)
- She had no evidence (umm, she did. Testimony from credible witnesses is evidence.)

(readers: those comments in parenthesis above came from my avatar, not easyt's)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notwithstanding that your assertions above are false....let's assume what you say is true --no participation, no evidence.
So?
Show the forum, if you will, the statue that makes such "criminal".
Show the forum, any investigation, or grand jury indictment, or court hearing, etc,.....that such actions are "criminal".

Look, it is like this 'easyt65' my intent is simply to make you a better and more credible participant here. But your tendency to crash beyond the warning track with you over-the-top hyperbole, simply keeps torpedoing any credibility you are trying to earn.

Good luck, but honestly, you need to do a little more due diligence. Your avatar is making you look poorly prepared for adult discussions. We wish you well.

 

[easyt65]

Like can you show us this so-called 'resistance'?
I kind think it is more a bit of llparanoic imagination than reality.
But, l'll keep an ope mind.
Show us the resistance that is vexing you so much.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"criminal failed impeachments"??
C'mon, poster 'eastyt', 'criminal'?
I know you are vexed by the impeachments, vexed by the Committee investigating January 6th, I get it.
But hyperbolic screeching really ain't helping your credibility or helping your imagined cause.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Do this, poster 'easyt65', sit down in front of your telly on Thursday. Watch the hearings with keen interest and sincere intent. And an open mind. Maybe then you can hear or see whether all of your "Why haven'ts"....get addressed.
Good luck.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mine too.
So maybe both of us can be relieved that this long investigation is finishing up and sharing what they have found. Let the chips fall where they may. May those responsible have the consequences laid at their door.
Tomorrow's televised hearings should be interesting for you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Your kids do that? Sheeeesh!!
Beat the hell out of cops with iron rods? Taser 'em? Spray 'em in the face with MACE? Smash window? Doors? Steal laptops?
Smear their poo on the walls? (just how old are they? were they, or they, being competently potty-trained?)

Gawd, you ramble on and on, spewing shit you know nothing about.

Let's talk about the 1st stupid thing you said to me -

Yes, I said 'Failed CRIMINAL Impeachment'

Pelosi vowed not to allow the Impeachment to move forward unless she had 2 things:
1. Bipartisanship
2. Undeniable Evidence

SHE LIED - SHE HAD NEITHER
- She had no bipartisan participation
- She had no evidence

During the Impeachment she and Democratds proved they had ZERO CRIME, ZERO EVIDENCE, & ZERO WITNESSES

- Pelosi actually finally admitted there was no crime, declaring no crime was needed to Impeach a President

- The only witness the Democrats claimed to have was a proven non-existent whistleblower Democrat Intel Committee Chairman Adam Schiff claimed he had, had spent tome talking to, etc... ONLY to have it come out he perjured himself and that the witness did NOT exist

-The only 'evidence' Democrats claimed to have and submitted as actual evidence was a criminally manufactured false transcript of a Trump phone call. WTF was Schiff thinking? The actual transcript had been released...and the next day he tried to submit his manufactured version.

Needless to say Schiff was caught criminally, seditiously, treasonously manufacturing false evidence against the President of the United States in an attempt to remove him from office (also known as a COUP ATTEMPT).
- Democrats, if course protected him and Schiff was never held a countable for his treason

During Pelosi's 2nd failed Impeachment coup attempt, ChiCom Spy-fu@ker Fang Fang Swalwe was caught manufacturing false evidence as well, photo-shopping a Trump Tweet / message.

Like Schiff, Swalwell was caught treasonously, criminally manufacturing ufacturing false evidence against a President of the United States.

 

[Oldestyle]

Then I guess the lesson is for democrats to avoid the flyover states.

The "lesson" is that getting an impartial trial in a liberal stronghold like DC is a pipe dream. At some point that becomes an issue. I think we've more than reached that point.

 

[Sandy Shanks]

Just how dumb are Republicans?

“If you’re a Republican, you can’t even lie to Congress or lie to an FBI agent or they’re coming after you,” Gohmert said in a Friday interview on NewsMax. “They’re going to bury you, they’re going to put you in the DC jail and terrorize and torture you and not live up to the Constitution there,” Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert.

“Don’t we suspect that like one-third of the people outside of the Capitol complex on January 6 were actual FBI agents hanging out,” Blake Masters, the Republican Senate candidate from Arizona.

CNN reports, "In a manner of hours, the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol will officially unveil its first findings in a primetime hearing that is expected to be carried live on all broadcast and cable news channels, save Fox News.

"And House Republican leaders have no idea – or, at least, a decidedly incomplete view – exactly what the committee will be presenting, flying blind into what could be one of the turning points in the 2022 midterm elections."

How could this happen to the Republicans? Answer; It was a matter of abject stupidity on the part of the House Minority Leader.

Here is the short version.

Legislation to form a bipartisan independent commission to understand how the January 6 insurrection happened passed the House with 35 Republican votes in May 2021.

That bill went to the upper chamber, where Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell killed it.

Mistake number one: Instead of a bipartisan independent commission, the investigation would be conducted by a House committee dominated by Democrats.

On July 1, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi named eight members of the committee: seven Democrats and Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney, who had voted to impeach then-President Donald Trump over his role on January 6. Later she appointed Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger.

Later that month, McCarthy announced his five selections for the committee – including firebrand Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio and Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana.

Since Jordan and Banks were likely to be called as witnesses before the committee, Pelosi rejected them. Jordan, in particular, played an important role in the events of Jan. 6.

In retaliation, McCarthy pulled all five GOP nominees. “Unless Speaker Pelosi reverses course and seats all five Republican nominees, Republicans will not be party to their sham process and will instead pursue our own investigation of the facts,” said McCarthy.

Mistake number two: Republicans have absolutely no idea what is going to happen when the committee opens its investigation into the Republican-led revolt to the public.

It is anticipated the forum's Republicans will have nothing to contribute. They are all hiding.

 

[Oldestyle]

Just how dumb are Republicans?

“If you’re a Republican, you can’t even lie to Congress or lie to an FBI agent or they’re coming after you,” Gohmert said in a Friday interview on NewsMax. “They’re going to bury you, they’re going to put you in the DC jail and terrorize and torture you and not live up to the Constitution there,” Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert.

“Don’t we suspect that like one-third of the people outside of the Capitol complex on January 6 were actual FBI agents hanging out,” Blake Masters, the Republican Senate candidate from Arizona.

CNN reports, "In a manner of hours, the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol will officially unveil its first findings in a primetime hearing that is expected to be carried live on all broadcast and cable news channels, save Fox News.

"And House Republican leaders have no idea – or, at least, a decidedly incomplete view – exactly what the committee will be presenting, flying blind into what could be one of the turning points in the 2022 midterm elections."

How could this happen to the Republicans? Answer; It was a matter of abject stupidity on the part of the House Minority Leader.

Here is the short version.

Legislation to form a bipartisan independent commission to understand how the January 6 insurrection happened passed the House with 35 Republican votes in May 2021.

That bill went to the upper chamber, where Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell killed it.

Mistake number one: Instead of a bipartisan independent commission, the investigation would be conducted by a House committee dominated by Democrats.

On July 1, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi named eight members of the committee: seven Democrats and Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney, who had voted to impeach then-President Donald Trump over his role on January 6. Later she appointed Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger.

Later that month, McCarthy announced his five selections for the committee – including firebrand Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio and Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana.

Since Jordan and Banks were likely to be called as witnesses before the committee, Pelosi rejected them. Jordan, in particular, played an important role in the events of Jan. 6.

In retaliation, McCarthy pulled all five GOP nominees. “Unless Speaker Pelosi reverses course and seats all five Republican nominees, Republicans will not be party to their sham process and will instead pursue our own investigation of the facts,” said McCarthy.

Mistake number two: Republicans have absolutely no idea what is going to happen when the committee opens its investigation into the Republican-led revolt to the public.

It is anticipated the forum's Republicans will have nothing to contribute. They are all hiding.

Let me see if I understand how this works...
Pelosi gets rid of Jordan and Banks because they were likely to be called as witnesses...yet she played a part in determining security levels at the Capital building and SHOULD be called to testify to that...but SHE gets to make the call to 86 Jordan and Banks?
You're kidding...right? (eye roll)

 

[Chillicothe]

.yet she played a part in determining security levels at the Capital building

What part did she play?
How do you know?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Mistake number two: Republicans have absolutely no idea what is going to happen when the committee opens its investigation into the Republican-led revolt to the public.

I'm sure it will be very exciting!!!

Won't do the Dems one bit of good in November.

 

[there4eyeM]

Belief that Congress should not be interrupted in carrying out Constitutional duties by a gang expressing violence is "leftist", according to certain individuals here. Bizarre that the Constitution be regarded in that light today, though of course it and the government it puts forward were very far "left" at the time of inception.
So, if the "right" wants to claim this intolerable episode and adopt the criminals who paraded around the "holy of holies" of American republican functions, they re welcome to them. That is exactly what history tells us right wing fascists do and we should not be surprised.

 

[scruffy]

Belief that Congress should not be interrupted in carrying out Constitutional duties by a gang expressing violence is "leftist", according to certain individuals here. Bizarre that the Constitution be regarded in that light today, though of course it and the government it puts forward were very far "left" at the time of inception.
So, if the "right" wants to claim this intolerable episode and adopt the criminals who paraded around the "holy of holies" of American republican functions, they re welcome to them. That is exactly what history tells us right wing fascists do and we should not be surprised.

There's no such thing as a right wing fascist, moron.

Fascists are left wing collectivist war mongers. Very authoritarian, very statist.

 

[there4eyeM]

There's no such thing as a right wing fascist, moron.

Fascists are left wing collectivist war mongers. Very authoritarian, very statist.

Attempt to corrupt language duly noted.

 

[scruffy]

Attempt to corrupt language duly noted.

Maybe crack a history book, fucktard.

Better yet, READ THEIR OWN WORDS.

No matter how many times you repeat a leftard lie, it's still a leftard lie

 

[scruffy]

Attempt to corrupt language duly noted.

Fascists are about as right wing as Neo-Cons are conservative.

NOT.

Neo-Cons are and always were war mongering leftists.

Study history. Neo-Cons originated in the Scoop Jackson campaign in the 70's. There's not a conservative bone in their bodies.

The fucking assholes finally started torturing people, and then everyone knew.

Don't believe the leftist historical revisionism. FDR was a big fan of Mussolini's.

 

[BlindBoo]

BULLSHIT

It was the => DEMOCRATIC PARTY <= that provoked, encouraged, AND SUPPORTED those riots

Financially, logistically, and in every other way.

Here is what the Democrat leader said about the violence.

“Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not.”

Why does the Neo-GOP push the flock to believe such an absurd and demonstrably false piece of propaganda?. Better yet, who really believes it?

 

[berg80]

Oh please, Berg! There is no way on God's green earth Sussmann was EVER going to be convicted of anything with a jury pulled from Washington DC in a trial overseen by a liberal judge! The only sham was that trial.

Hold that same trial with an impartial judge anywhere in the "fly over" States and Sussmann is begging for a plea deal!

IOW, left with accepting that Durham's case was weak to the extent it never should have been brought to trial, or making up another bullshit conspiracy theory, you chose door #2.

 

[berg80]

Why does the Neo-GOP push the flock to believe such an absurd and demonstrably false piece of propaganda?. Better yet, who really believes it?

Trumpleton's believe it. As you know, lies like the ones associated with the BLM protests dominated right wing media during the protests. They've been absorbed in to the fatuous narrative so many of Trump's cult accept such that no amount of factual rebuttal will dislodge the lies.
It goes without saying the same applies for dozens of events.......everything from Mueller's report to the attempted coup.