wouldn ever pass PC muster today.
Actually -WW2 was was a relatively short war.
Not a stalemate mate like Korea ora quagmire like Nam
Or 10 years Afg war against nobodies..................
I think that's akin to looking through the wrong end of a telescope. The sheer magnitude of WWII, if it occurred today, would easily result in firebombings, or worse. That's why we didn't have a WWIII and opted for a Cold War consisting of small proxy wars. A direct conflict would too easily have gone nuclear or involved the use of chemical or biological agents among large population centers.
The reason the proxy wars appeared stalemated was precisely because neither side wanted to escalate to the next level. They became wars of attrition which Americans, who valued the lives of their soldiers over the cause they were fighting, soon grew tired.
An obvious difference between these conflicts is to count the casualties. They are dramatically different.
United States military casualties of war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We, just the United States alone, suffered 405,399 dead in WWII. Almost half a million dead Americans. It's almost inconceivable the effect it had on our people. Of course we'd fired bomb, nuke, whatever it took to end the war. The effects on world, much less the USA, were so devastating, it could not be sustained. It
had to end.
It's not that anyone wants the lesser wars to be sustained, but that we were not willing to cross the line of "winning at all costs" because of the unnecessary loss of life it would induce. There's no reason to firebomb Kandahar and kill every man, woman and child because there need isn't that critical. So we use a slower, but less deadly approach because we're Americans. Not blood-thirsty murderers like some people want to portray us.