WTH?!? Most Racist Supreme Court Ruling Since Plessy — Greenlights Racial Profiling in ICE Raids

[Hellbilly]

Straw man

It’s a reality.

 

[Unkotare]

It’s a reality.

For YOU, from YOU. Straw man.

 

[postman]

And you were wrong walking isn’t required.

"Do it walking" is an idiom.

Learn the language.

 

[Hellbilly]

For YOU, from YOU. Straw man.

How would you feel if ICE could detain white people because they’re white.

 

[postman]

Actually, that’s right. If a law enforcement officer or agent briefly detains you to ask you anything (say in California), then (unless that law enforcement office or agent already has probable cause) the individual stopped may indeed simply “walk away.”

Re: the individual stopped may indeed simply “walk away.”

If the officer wants to continue asking questions, he better do it walking.

 

[Maxdeath]

The question is quite reasonable

Can you be detained because you look Hispanic, speak Spanish or have a menial job?

Conservative justices just looked the other way and allowed Trump to continue his round up

Once again, the Robert’s court refused to stand up for individual rights

You are playing extremely loose with the facts. Yes they said that they put a temporary hold on another judges order. Yes it allows them to ask about citizenship IF the person meets all the criteria.
Exactly how do you identify illegals in the U.S. if you do not use a number of criteria to identify them? Did they tattoo illegal on their forehead?
Look I get it you want to keep your wage slaves because you are no longer allowed to own slaves.
I get it you do not want to actually pay a living wage to those cleaning pools, do landscaping and other jobs.
How dare others want laws enforced.

 

[Unkotare]

How would you feel if ICE could detain white people because they’re white.

Up in my neck of the woods lots of illegal Irish immigrants are detained and eventually deported. Happens all the time. Not because they're white, because they're illegal. Next?

 

[Unkotare]

... Did they tattoo illegal on their forehead?
...

Some of them actually do.

 

[Maxdeath]

How would you feel if ICE could detain white people because they’re white.

If I meet all the criteria other then just white? I would not be surprised. If they detained me because just skin color, no. Problem is a lot of people are pretending there is no other criteria other then skin color because they want low wage people to be their new slaves.

 

[westwall]

So is investigating a murder

But you still need probable cause

Exigent circumstances

 

[postman]

I do bother reading, you idiot. But I don’t spend my waking moments wondering what you might have said in some thread or post which I haven’t seen. That’s why I asked you for a link, in the first place, stupid.

Damn, you’re dense.

You posted on this very thread at Today at 9:42 AM #47

My post was at Today at 10:30 AM #61

You posted right after at 10:34 AM # 64

Responding to Rightwingers post from Today at 10:21 AM #50

And again at Today at 10:34 AM #67

Responding to Rightwingers post from
Today at 10:30 AM #62

In short, you didn't see my post #61, from 10:30am but saw post #62 from 10:30am

 

[postman]

If I meet all the criteria other then just white? I would not be surprised. If they detained me because just skin color, no. Problem is a lot of people are pretending there is no other criteria other then skin color because they want low wage people to be their new slaves.

Re: If I meet all the criteria other then just white?

Nope, just because you were white. And there are a bunch of white Canadians in this country that are illegal aliens by overstaying their visa.
.

 

[Invisibleflash]

Wrong.

 

[Hellbilly]

Up in my neck of the woods lots of illegal Irish immigrants are detained and eventually deported. Happens all the time. Not because they're white, because they're illegal. Next?

That’s not an honest answer. Moving on

 

[postman]

Exigent circumstances

Exigent circumstances, as defined in United States v. McConney are "circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of the suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts."

 

[Unkotare]

That’s not an honest answer. ...

It's 100% honest, 100% true, and 100% related to your question. Don't ask questions if you don't want an answer.

 

[Hellbilly]

It's 100% honest, 100% true, and 100% related to your question. Don't ask questions if you don't want an answer.

I didn’t ask you what happens in your neck of the woods. I asked how you would feel about white people being detained because they’re white.

 

[BackAgain]

"Do it walking" is an idiom.

Learn the language.

It’s an idiom not in our common parlance.

Stop making shit up to cover our own ignorance. It only compounds it.

Learn to be honest.

 

[westwall]

Exigent circumstances, as defined in United States v. McConney are "circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of the suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts."

They are whining about investigations being run out in the open air.

 

[BackAgain]

Re: the individual stopped may indeed simply “walk away.”

If the officer wants to continue asking questions, he better do it walking.

Nice moving of the goalposts.

Now you’re back to the use of the phrase “Do it walking” as you actually meant it. Not an idiom.

And your “point” is pointless. We’ve already covered that the civilian is free to walk away. That also means he or she doesn’t have to answer at all and that, legally, the law enforcement officer or agent can’t compel the person to answer.