eots
no fly list
The NIST report denied and excluded evidence and failed to provide a plausible scenario for the collapse of WTC 7
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
jet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
there was no jet fuel in building 7jet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
buildiing 7 had random office firesjet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
jet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
clean debate zone..doubt you can handle itWhy are loons like you still furthering these silly conspiracy theories?buildiing 7 had random office firesjet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
Fires which came from other buildings that were burning from jet fuel.??..what are trying to implyjet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
Fires which came from other buildings that were burning from jet fuel.
This page has a video of it happening.
Footage that kills the conspiracy theories Rare footage shows WTC 7 consumed by fire Daily Mail Online
well apparently it can produce molten metaljet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
You are not capable..you prove it with every post..you can not support your position so you resort to inane comments..you loseI agree that your conspiracy theories are hardly the stuff of debate, clean or otherwise.clean debate zone..doubt you can handle itWhy are loons like you still furthering these silly conspiracy theories?buildiing 7 had random office firesjet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
.Cutting and pasting silly conspiracy theory drivel is pointless and time wasting.You are not capable..you prove it with every post..you can not support your position so you resort to inane comments..you loseI agree that your conspiracy theories are hardly the stuff of debate, clean or otherwise.clean debate zone..doubt you can handle itWhy are loons like you still furthering these silly conspiracy theories?buildiing 7 had random office fires
It seems it is you who is wasting time..attempt to support the NIST theory or go awayYou spend way too much time with your silly conspiracies.you can not support the NIST report just admit itCutting and pasting silly conspiracy theory drivel is pointless and time wasting.You are not capable..you prove it with every post..you can not support your position so you resort to inane comments..you loseI agree that your conspiracy theories are hardly the stuff of debate, clean or otherwise.clean debate zone..doubt you can handle it
you can not support the NIST report just admit itWhy are loons like you still furthering these silly conspiracy theories?
jet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn said:"I have never seen melted steel in a building fire,But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
Fires which came from other buildings that were burning from jet fuel.
This page has a video of it happening.
Footage that kills the conspiracy theories Rare footage shows WTC 7 consumed by fire Daily Mail Online
You are not capable..you prove it with every post..you can not support your position so you resort to inane comments..you loseI agree that your conspiracy theories are hardly the stuff of debate, clean or otherwise.clean debate zone..doubt you can handle itWhy are loons like you still furthering these silly conspiracy theories?buildiing 7 had random office firesjet fuel can't melt steel beams
... but it can heat it enough to weaken it's structural integrity.
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength, which requires much less heat.
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
Indeed.as always,you win,he lost the game as you took him to school with that video with that fire chief.they can never get around that video with what that expert says .lol.It seems it is you who is wasting time..attempt to support the NIST theory or go awayYou spend way too much time with your silly conspiracies.you can not support the NIST report just admit itCutting and pasting silly conspiracy theory drivel is pointless and time wasting.You are not capable..you prove it with every post..you can not support your position so you resort to inane comments..you loseI agree that your conspiracy theories are hardly the stuff of debate, clean or otherwise.