KokomoJojo
VIP Member
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
if it were a design flaw insurance companies would have been all over it.wtc 7s design was not called into question by NIST no significant recommendations to building code resulted from the NIST reportfalse ! that all depends on the design of the building...you're not very good at this are you?that's another thing if a building falls down none of it fall outward? especially since most of the fire would have been internal not toward the outer walls for cement and steel doesn't burn like furniture etc.. the building would have never fallen like that. how come nobody can find even one building in all this time that has ever fallen from fire and earthquakes even like this? because it doesn't happen perfectly like that. how stupid do you people have to be.
steel being critically weakened by jet fuelyeah and jet fuel melts steel and metaled steel breaks at the same time perfectly allowing structure to collapse vertically. lol
no its not------demo jobs show evidence of implosion
Hmm lets see if you got something there:
describe what evidence of implosion looks like.
no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
If I recall correctly ----witnesses in the building saw a plane------right?
no its not------demo jobs show evidence of implosion
Hmm lets see if you got something there:
describe what evidence of implosion looks like.
something has to squish in-------it may not be apparent on a casual
glance while the event is ongoing---but should show up on exam of video and multi-views-----the squish-in is an EARLY part of the cave-in-----it initiates it.---
it is the big time energy event. -------the big time energy event in the
falling towers did not happen until they fell. They stood quietly burning
after the BAM AND FLASH of the plane-----so quietly that from my position
-------I was confident that everyone would get out------because very early on I
thought that the big time smoke was started by a piper cub that hit a wall----
nothing was shaken (that the first hit----and for the several minutes it took
to get to the second hit---_BIG TIME BANG AND FLASH/ Firm buildings
for more than half hour--------just spitting white smoke------sudden collapse then
BIG TIME ENERGY RELEASE at the base and the sky darkened
no its not------demo jobs show evidence of implosion
Hmm lets see if you got something there:
describe what evidence of implosion looks like.
something has to squish in-------it may not be apparent on a casual
glance while the event is ongoing---but should show up on exam of video and multi-views-----the squish-in is an EARLY part of the cave-in-----it initiates it.---
it is the big time energy event. -------the big time energy event in the
falling towers did not happen until they fell. They stood quietly burning
after the BAM AND FLASH of the plane-----so quietly that from my position
-------I was confident that everyone would get out------because very early on I
thought that the big time smoke was started by a piper cub that hit a wall----
nothing was shaken (that the first hit----and for the several minutes it took
to get to the second hit---_BIG TIME BANG AND FLASH/ Firm buildings
for more than half hour--------just spitting white smoke------sudden collapse then
BIG TIME ENERGY RELEASE at the base and the sky darkened
I didnt hear any physics or engineering in there anywhere, just a lot of parrot talk, want to try again?
no one said there was not a plane..why do you keep repeating thisno plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
If I recall correctly ----witnesses in the building saw a plane------right?
you just shamelessly make shit upno its not------demo jobs show evidence of implosion
Hmm lets see if you got something there:
describe what evidence of implosion looks like.
something has to squish in-------it may not be apparent on a casual
glance while the event is ongoing---but should show up on exam of video and multi-views-----the squish-in is an EARLY part of the cave-in-----it initiates it.---
it is the big time energy event. -------the big time energy event in the
falling towers did not happen until they fell. They stood quietly burning
after the BAM AND FLASH of the plane-----so quietly that from my position
-------I was confident that everyone would get out------because very early on I
thought that the big time smoke was started by a piper cub that hit a wall----
nothing was shaken (that the first hit----and for the several minutes it took
to get to the second hit---_BIG TIME BANG AND FLASH/ Firm buildings
for more than half hour--------just spitting white smoke------sudden collapse then
BIG TIME ENERGY RELEASE at the base and the sky darkened
I didnt hear any physics or engineering in there anywhere, just a lot of parrot talk, want to try again?
It is obvious that you never did physics 101 "squished in"---is a technical
term for implosion
no one said there was not a plane..why do you keep repeating thisno plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
If I recall correctly ----witnesses in the building saw a plane------right?
no its not------demo jobs show evidence of implosion
Hmm lets see if you got something there:
describe what evidence of implosion looks like.
something has to squish in-------it may not be apparent on a casual
glance while the event is ongoing---but should show up on exam of video and multi-views-----the squish-in is an EARLY part of the cave-in-----it initiates it.---
it is the big time energy event. -------the big time energy event in the
falling towers did not happen until they fell. They stood quietly burning
after the BAM AND FLASH of the plane-----so quietly that from my position
-------I was confident that everyone would get out------because very early on I
thought that the big time smoke was started by a piper cub that hit a wall----
nothing was shaken (that the first hit----and for the several minutes it took
to get to the second hit---_BIG TIME BANG AND FLASH/ Firm buildings
for more than half hour--------just spitting white smoke------sudden collapse then
BIG TIME ENERGY RELEASE at the base and the sky darkened
I didnt hear any physics or engineering in there anywhere, just a lot of parrot talk, want to try again?
It is obvious that you never did physics 101 "squished in"---is a technical
term for implosion
And believing that spoon-fed garbage that the government has put out in the so-called "Official Story" proves what a gullible moron you are.who knows ,they could well of had means and technology more advanced than the average demolition company..wireless detonation would be completely plausible as well ..it is just cost restrictive for demolition companiesreally simple, less than a minute each, little duct tape remote control detonators.
7 was empty all day
really simple, less than a minute each, little duct tape remote control detonators.
How big were the charges? How many did they need?
who knows
Not the idiotic conspiracy morons.
wireless detonation would be completely plausible as well
I'm not interested in the imagainary detonators, I'm interested in the tonnage of the imaginary explosives.
So basically, you believe that the demolitions that were clearly used to bring down WTC 7 is "imaginary".
Yet, you certainly believe the imaginary reason that was given, saying that fire was the reason why the tower collapsed.![]()
WTC 7 Now A Proven Case Of Controlled Demolition - PaulCraigRoberts.org
Using Paul Craig Roberts as a source just shows you're an even bigger idiot than I first thought.
Congrats! That isn't an easy thing to do.
no one said there was not a plane..why do you keep repeating thisno plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
If I recall correctly ----witnesses in the building saw a plane------right?
in fact----there are people who claim that no plane crash caused a breach in
one of the pentagon walls-----the breach was caused by a mysterious missile
BUILDING 7....focusno one said there was not a plane..why do you keep repeating thisno plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
If I recall correctly ----witnesses in the building saw a plane------right?
in fact----there are people who claim that no plane crash caused a breach in
one of the pentagon walls-----the breach was caused by a mysterious missile
no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
no plane was found
no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,
no plane was found
You are absolutely correct.
If a plane did hit as what was claimed, then where the large identifiable parts?
I asked that one another site, the answer I got was, it just vaporized.![]()
![]()