Would you support Jeb Bush for president in 2016?

Would you support Jeb Bush for president in 2016?

  • Yes

    Votes: 18 21.4%
  • No

    Votes: 66 78.6%

  • Total voters
    84
  • Poll closed .
No. Jeb Bush is a mexican loyalist in his heart and has no interest in the US.

Don't ever change katzendummy.

You are the board entertainment committee, the idiot mascot, the court jester and I absolutely love reading your deluded shit.

What a rich fantasy life you live.
:clap2: :cuckoo: :clap2: :cuckoo:
 
He could well lose the whole GOP, in which case he would not make it out of the primary.
 
Jeb Bush won't make it out of the primary. If he did, it might mean a serious third party contender. If anything, republicans don't walk in the same kind of lockstep democrats do.
 
6683_233603590097953_69766875_n.jpg


549394_232632180195094_1536645014_n.jpg


At least we can say the marines in Iraq had the chance to fight back, unlike Benghazi when this administration (rather embarrassingly) got caught with their pants down. I guess that's what happens when Obama begins to boast himself and "spike the football" about Bin Laden prematurely. Mission accomplished? I don't think so.

All of the human cattle that voted for the most failed first term president in US history in 2004 are morally degenerate enough to vote for Monkey Boy Jeb Bush, Junebug's stupid brother.

Me? I'd rather be dead than vote for a corporate shill - including but not limited to Monkey Boy Bush.

The only decent Bush who is known to have lived is Pap Bush and he sold out to a filthy fucking corporatist PLUS anti-abortion nuts to get his nose under the tent. Admittedly he quickly rejected voodoo economics as quick as he could, but that caused halfwit America to turn on him. Well, the stupid fucks got what they deserved ever since.
 
Last edited:
Jeb Bush won't make it out of the primary. If he did, it might mean a serious third party contender. If anything, republicans don't walk in the same kind of lockstep democrats do.

Really?

Then how is it there was no "third party" challenger to Romney, a guy who was a liberal in Massachusetts.

Or McCain, who was the Quintessential "RINO". Nope. No third party to challenge for him.

How about "Bob Dole", the "Tax collector for the Welfare State". Well, yeah, you had Perot up against him.. but it wasn't conservatives animating his zombie ass.

The establishment will shove Jeb down your throat, and you'll like it. You'll get on here singing his praises, until he loses to Hillary, and then you'll whine he wasn't a "real conservative".
 
Jeb Bush won't make it out of the primary. If he did, it might mean a serious third party contender. If anything, republicans don't walk in the same kind of lockstep democrats do.

Really?

Then how is it there was no "third party" challenger to Romney, a guy who was a liberal in Massachusetts.

Or McCain, who was the Quintessential "RINO". Nope. No third party to challenge for him.

How about "Bob Dole", the "Tax collector for the Welfare State". Well, yeah, you had Perot up against him.. but it wasn't conservatives animating his zombie ass.

The establishment will shove Jeb down your throat, and you'll like it. You'll get on here singing his praises, until he loses to Hillary, and then you'll whine he wasn't a "real conservative".

You are backwards. Romney won the primary. So did John McCain. Romney also won 47% of the vote against obama. Why didn't Newt Gingrich win the primary, or Rick Santorum? Jeb Bush will never make it out of the primary. He is too pro mexico. He will be more like Bill Richardson than Mitt Romney.
 
[

You are backwards. Romney won the primary. So did John McCain. Romney also won 47% of the vote against obama. Why didn't Newt Gingrich win the primary, or Rick Santorum? Jeb Bush will never make it out of the primary. He is too pro mexico. He will be more like Bill Richardson than Mitt Romney.

Newt and Rick lost because the people who REALLY RUN YOUR PARTY wanted them to lose.

This is what you don't get. You stupid bible thumping fugnuts who vote republican because you live in mortal terror some woman or gay person might be enjoying her life.

You don't run your party. They do. They nominate the person they think will do their bidding.

It's why they get the big tax breaks and the free trade and the union busting and right to work laws.

And you guys get-- well. Nothing. Abortion is still illegal, gays are getting married and your kid will still be taught he evolved from a monkey in school.

It just amazes me that you guys don't get this.

I'll admit, I fell for it for a long time, but eventually, I figured it out. BUt I remember when Republicans were still sane.
 
[

You are backwards. Romney won the primary. So did John McCain. Romney also won 47% of the vote against obama. Why didn't Newt Gingrich win the primary, or Rick Santorum? Jeb Bush will never make it out of the primary. He is too pro mexico. He will be more like Bill Richardson than Mitt Romney.

Newt and Rick lost because the people who REALLY RUN YOUR PARTY wanted them to lose.

This is what you don't get. You stupid bible thumping fugnuts who vote republican because you live in mortal terror some woman or gay person might be enjoying her life.

You don't run your party. They do. They nominate the person they think will do their bidding.

It's why they get the big tax breaks and the free trade and the union busting and right to work laws.

And you guys get-- well. Nothing. Abortion is still illegal, gays are getting married and your kid will still be taught he evolved from a monkey in school.

It just amazes me that you guys don't get this.

I'll admit, I fell for it for a long time, but eventually, I figured it out. BUt I remember when Republicans were still sane.

Have you ever one time saw me quote the Bible or use the Bible in any argument against the normalization of homosexuality? Or, used the Bible as an argument that the grotesque perversion that abortion has become. Once. Just once. Please use citations.
 
[

Have you ever one time saw me quote the Bible or use the Bible in any argument against the normalization of homosexuality? Or, used the Bible as an argument that the grotesque perversion that abortion has become. Once. Just once. Please use citations.

I don't have the time or patience to wade through your thousands of homophobic rants.

I was speaking of you bible thumping fugnuts in general, not you in particular.

You might just be a hater because you - like most homophobes- think it's icky and are suppressing your own sleeping giant.
 
[

You are backwards. Romney won the primary. So did John McCain. Romney also won 47% of the vote against obama. Why didn't Newt Gingrich win the primary, or Rick Santorum? Jeb Bush will never make it out of the primary. He is too pro mexico. He will be more like Bill Richardson than Mitt Romney.

Newt and Rick lost because the people who REALLY RUN YOUR PARTY wanted them to lose.

This is what you don't get. You stupid bible thumping fugnuts who vote republican because you live in mortal terror some woman or gay person might be enjoying her life.

You don't run your party. They do. They nominate the person they think will do their bidding.

It's why they get the big tax breaks and the free trade and the union busting and right to work laws.

And you guys get-- well. Nothing. Abortion is still illegal, gays are getting married and your kid will still be taught he evolved from a monkey in school.

It just amazes me that you guys don't get this.

I'll admit, I fell for it for a long time, but eventually, I figured it out. BUt I remember when Republicans were still sane.

Have you ever one time saw me quote the Bible or use the Bible in any argument against the normalization of homosexuality? Or, used the Bible as an argument that the grotesque perversion that abortion has become. Once. Just once. Please use citations.
He's a religious bigot, plain and simple.

Everyone who disagrees with his poorly closeted lolberalism is a "bible thumper". :lol:
 
[

Have you ever one time saw me quote the Bible or use the Bible in any argument against the normalization of homosexuality? Or, used the Bible as an argument that the grotesque perversion that abortion has become. Once. Just once. Please use citations.

I don't have the time or patience to wade through your thousands of homophobic rants.

I was speaking of you bible thumping fugnuts in general, not you in particular.

You might just be a hater because you - like most homophobes- think it's icky and are suppressing your own sleeping giant.

I don't think homosexuality is icky. I draw a distinction between the practice of homosexuality which is benign, and the acceptance of the normalcy of the practice which is degenerate. Are you kind of clear on that point? People like yourself MUST use religion because without it you simply have no argument at all to support something so societally destructive.

Although, it is being debated (not here, there aren't enough people with the intellect) as to whether acceptance of homosexuality is a contributory cause, or just a symptom of a much larger cultural sickness.
 
Newt and Rick lost because the people who REALLY RUN YOUR PARTY wanted them to lose.

This is what you don't get. You stupid bible thumping fugnuts who vote republican because you live in mortal terror some woman or gay person might be enjoying her life.

You don't run your party. They do. They nominate the person they think will do their bidding.

It's why they get the big tax breaks and the free trade and the union busting and right to work laws.

And you guys get-- well. Nothing. Abortion is still illegal, gays are getting married and your kid will still be taught he evolved from a monkey in school.

It just amazes me that you guys don't get this.

I'll admit, I fell for it for a long time, but eventually, I figured it out. BUt I remember when Republicans were still sane.

Have you ever one time saw me quote the Bible or use the Bible in any argument against the normalization of homosexuality? Or, used the Bible as an argument that the grotesque perversion that abortion has become. Once. Just once. Please use citations.
He's a religious bigot, plain and simple.

Everyone who disagrees with his poorly closeted lolberalism is a "bible thumper". :lol:

Well that explains it! It's a religious thing.
 
[

I don't think homosexuality is icky. I draw a distinction between the practice of homosexuality which is benign, and the acceptance of the normalcy of the practice which is degenerate. Are you kind of clear on that point? People like yourself MUST use religion because without it you simply have no argument at all to support something so societally destructive.

Although, it is being debated (not here, there aren't enough people with the intellect) as to whether acceptance of homosexuality is a contributory cause, or just a symptom of a much larger cultural sickness.

Wealth inequality has a lot more to do with any "sickness" we have as a society than the acceptance of homosexuality.

In fact, Western Europe has figured this out. It's no big deal, gays are accepted. But they also have less wealth inequality and strong welfare states and don't have anywhere near the crime we have.

We are kind of the retards of the Industrialized world. We keep holding up our paper that says "2+2=Cat" and wonder why the rest of the world laughs at us.
 
[

You are backwards. Romney won the primary. So did John McCain. Romney also won 47% of the vote against obama. Why didn't Newt Gingrich win the primary, or Rick Santorum? Jeb Bush will never make it out of the primary. He is too pro mexico. He will be more like Bill Richardson than Mitt Romney.

Newt and Rick lost because the people who REALLY RUN YOUR PARTY wanted them to lose.

This is what you don't get. You stupid bible thumping fugnuts who vote republican because you live in mortal terror some woman or gay person might be enjoying her life.

You don't run your party. They do. They nominate the person they think will do their bidding.

It's why they get the big tax breaks and the free trade and the union busting and right to work laws.

And you guys get-- well. Nothing. Abortion is still illegal, gays are getting married and your kid will still be taught he evolved from a monkey in school.

It just amazes me that you guys don't get this.

I'll admit, I fell for it for a long time, but eventually, I figured it out. BUt I remember when Republicans were still sane.

Very well said.

Many of us remember a Republican party that valued flesh and blood persons and hard work more than economic alchemy and paper entities given the rights of natural born persons. That party has less in common with the current nutball gaggle than raging syphilis does with good health.
 
Last edited:
[quo
He's a religious bigot, plain and simple.

Everyone who disagrees with his poorly closeted lolberalism is a "bible thumper". :lol:

It's not a matter of liberalism as all, guy.

Republicans USED to get it. They used to get a strong middle class was the backbone of a strong society and the firewall against the "socialism" you live in bed-wetting fear of.

Ike got it. Nixon Got it. Ford Got it. I think on some level, even Reagan got it.

It's when the rich douchebags like the Bushes and Romney took over, and figured you can just manipulate the religious stupids into voting agianst their own economic interests that things went south.

Or as another wise republican said, "You can't fool all of the people all of the time."
 
[quo
He's a religious bigot, plain and simple.

Everyone who disagrees with his poorly closeted lolberalism is a "bible thumper". :lol:

It's not a matter of liberalism as all, guy.

Republicans USED to get it. They used to get a strong middle class was the backbone of a strong society and the firewall against the "socialism" you live in bed-wetting fear of.

Ike got it. Nixon Got it. Ford Got it. I think on some level, even Reagan got it.

It's when the rich douchebags like the Bushes and Romney took over, and figured you can just manipulate the religious stupids into voting agianst their own economic interests that things went south.

Or as another wise republican said, "You can't fool all of the people all of the time."
Nixod was the quintessential closeted lolberal...Economic central planner, bureaucracy bloater, etcetera......Little wonder you point to him as someone who "gets it". :lol:

Oh, and you're still a slimeball religious bigot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top