Woody Allen Child Molester?

My question is..that pic of him with that young girl where she is grasping the railing..is that a young soon yi or one of his new adoptive daughters?

Second question is...would ANYONE here on this thread ever let Woody Allen be alone with your 7 year old kid for an hour or two?


"My question is..that pic of him with that young girl where she is grasping the railing..is that a young soon yi or one of his new adoptive daughters?"

that was answered several times in this thread, and it is easy to find out.

why don't you do that?
 
If he molested my kids and married one of our adopted kids, I'd want to ruin him too.

It's funny to see who will defend child molesters.

The molestation charge is an allegation and Soon-Yi was not Woody's adopted kid; it was Mia's adopted kid. In her memoir, she encouraged the two to get to know each other because she was approaching 20 and he didn't much know her.

Why? Because Woody didn't live with them or spend that much time with all the kids. So they started hanging out and a year later it was clear to them they were in love. They've been together 22 years now.
 
Woody Allen is a scumbag, banging his adoptive daughter. SCUM. BAG.
I hope Mia does destroy him but Hollywood seems to think it's A OK to fuck ones daughter even if she is an adoptive one.

Soon-Yi was not his adopted daughter, and she no doubt doesn't find her husband to be a scumbag.
 
it's so unbelievable....everybody crucifying a man with hearsay...


I would like to see you in his shoes....people are weird or ignorant or I don't what...

Coming from someone that would crucify Mia Farrow on hearsay?

I really don't care for Allen or his humor or movies.

Whether he has done what has been rumored, innocent until proven guilty.

Well we do know he married his adopted daughter.

Here he is as her Dad

3235375a4fmanzie.jpg


Here he is as her Husband :cuckoo:

woody-allen-soon-yi-AP.jpg


Did Woody Allen Molest His Adopted Daughter 22 Years Ago?

On This Day In 1997, Woody Allen Marries His Adopted Step-Daughter Soon-Yi Previn | Today in History

The picture of that child is Woody and Soon-Yi's adopted daughter Bechel Dumaine Allen.

People keep spreading that picture around and making a false claim about who's in it.
 
[

There's a real simple explanation for "finger fuck" I sprained my wrist and I'm stuck typing with only one hand and it's making me crazy to type this slow.

Consequently I'm taking short cuts with words and phrases and "finger fuck" is a hell of a lot easier than continually typing in "vaginal penetration with his finger while kissing her all over".

Regarding the Judge. It was his open attack on what a piece of shit Woody was as a father that was astonishing.

I mean he ripped Woody a new asshole in his judgement.

Re: Dylan well hell's bells I've brought up the testimony of the babysitters, court documents and today I brought to the board a fabulous op ed of a professional child abuse investigator who really pointed out in this piece how horrifically this case was handled.

It's worth the read. I don't know if Dylan was molested or not. I only jumped in on the Dylan part to try to smack down those who were just rabidly going after Mia Farrow.

I mean hell's bells your babysitters employer calls you and tells you she saw Woody on his knees in front of Dylan with his head in her lap and then Dylan tells Mia what Daddy did, what the hell was Mia to do?

Ignore it? Tell the child she's imagining shit? Tell her she's a bad girl for making up lies?

I believe Mia did the only thing she could do. Take her to a doctor and have an investigation started.

Frankly I was just keeping to the "creepy" part of Soon Yi before certain individuals wanted to get into a dust up. I will always oblige :eusa_angel:

This really really worth the read.

Patrick Perion is a child abuse investigator in Illinois. In this article he gives his professional opinion on the Woody Allen/Dylan Farrow abuse case.
]

Your "professional" abuse investigator was not there, did not talk to any of the witnesses, and is just speculating on media reports. Therefore, he's really not very "professional".

But let's look at what we have as REAL evidence.

No Physical evidence.
Dylan couldn't keep her story straight when she talked to the first people who examined her at Yales.
Allen took a lie detector test and passed.
Moses Farrow has said nothing happened and his mother is batshit crazy.
The Prosecutor, as much as he wanted to, did not press charges.

But, hey, fuck all that kind of evidence and concepts of reasonable doubt.

let's hang him because we think his relationship with an adult (Soon-Yi) is creepy.

burning-at-the-stake.jpg
 
I have discussed what I felt was germane to the topic.

[MENTION=40540]Connery[/MENTION]

And I have discussed it from the point of view of a clinician. Yet, they simply refuse to see reality.

When my children were VERY young and I was a stay at home mom, I saw a TV show about people who had been molested as children. They didn't have 'good touch bad touch' then, but the recommendation was to give children permission to decline to associate with anyone who made them feel uncomfortable. On the show it said that most victims knew something was wrong but did not leave the situation because the person was a family member or a trusted friend. That is what I did with my children. I told them that if ANYONE, no matter who it was, made them uncomfortable not to be around the person. Years later, my daughter told me of someone in my late husband's family she really felt was a creep and had avoided like the plague when she was very young because of what I told her would not stay around him. I was glad to know that. I don't know if he ever perpetrated anyone, but he was a sleaze bag.

Years later after I had been to school and was working I asked all of my patients who were survivors if they had any inkling that something was wrong. To the person, Just as on the show, they all said 'yes' but that the person was a trusted relative, family friend, bus driver, teacher, shopkeeper, neighbor, etc. Most of us have gut feelings. Few of us have permission to follow our gut feelings.

I recommend a book: The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker. Anyone who reads it will have no problem believing in and heeding their gut feelings about other people.

As we progress to the master's level as clinicians, we learn the models and theories, but we never forget that if we walk into a group of people and the hair on the back of our necks stands up, something is definitely wrong.


Thank you for your thoughtful post. In my various capacities scout leader, volunteer at my son's school etc I am around children a great deal and I am required to take numerous courses regarding some of the issues expressed in this thread. I have read what many people have said, I have taken in constructive posts such as yours and they gave me pause and time to reflect on different elements of Allen's behavior, Dylan's behavior and that of the family unit. I looked at this thread in a global way rather than the sole issue of Allen's guilt or innocence. In fact, I have not thought much about that , although I have tried to look at all the facts, circumstances etc. that were available.

One thing I do know...kid's can tell tales, kids have very active and vivid imaginations and kids can easily be manipulated by those they love and trust. IMO the telltale sign is in the behavior of the child and whether that behavior is aberrant or within normal parameters and from there with counseling the truth can be drawn out over time. Then perhaps the road to healing can traversed it is rife with pain, however, when the other end is reached the person may begin to feel whole.

[MENTION=40540]Connery[/MENTION]

Yes, behaviors to tell the tale. When I was teaching I had a student come to my office as torn up as a can of kraut. Her daughter's behavior had changed. So, she got someone to help her log onto the computer using her daughter's password. When she did she learned that the girl and some of her friends had been lured into a teenage prostitution ring by some 50 year old men. My student contacted the FBI who came and got the computer. She received death threats and went through some really horrible stuff. But the men who were running this teenage prostitution ring were apprehended and shut down. It made national news.

If a parent waits until the child's behavior has changed they have waited too late because the abuse has already happened. The goal is to PREVENT the abuse, so the parent has to act preemptively and many parents just don't know to do that or don't think they can. Many still use the old 'don't take candy from strangers' method, and quite frankly most children just don't get that. If the parent dismisses what the child says out of hand, then the parent has failed the child. Children as young as 7 simply don't have the vocabulary or sexual knowledge to make stuff up. If a parent is coaching the child, and yes, that does happen in some bitter divorce cases, it is not difficult for the seasoned professional to tell because the child cannot deviate from the script the parent gave.

Courts are wising up and most states now have what is called a 'parenting plan.' In states that have those, a parent who disses the other parent or draws the child into a conspiratorial relationship such as making accusations of abuse which are not true can lose not only custody, but also visitation rights. In this day and age, using a child in this manner is going to backfire. When I lived in Nashville, the TN Supreme Court hired a psychologist for a 1 year term to write Tennessee's parenting plan. It has teeth in it.

The fact that in this particular case, the child, now an adult, has pursued the issue of her own accord and has clear symptomology really leaves very little doubt in my mind. It really takes courage for a victim to do something like an 'open letter' to a celeb parent. And, as we all can see, it really draws ire not only toward the person who wrote the letter, but to other members of the family. I believe the system failed this child. And I can tell you from years of practice that the system has failed many children in this country. That is how so many authority figures, not just parents, have gotten away with victimizing children in this country for so long. I hope the tide is turning, but the reality is that bringing a perp to justice remains a mine field for the victim. And the Constitution still gives the accused the right to look dead on in a court of law at the victim even when the victim is a child of tender years. That will not change, nor should it. But to refuse to pursue the perp because of the child's tender years denies that child the closure that he/she needs.

Well, I'm pretty well done with this thread. It is just the same asinine BS over and over with the usual suspects defending adults who victimize children. Cheers.
 
Last edited:
None of that is evidence of guilt. It's just saying you think K you know better than everyone else. You dont. And thus needed to take the cheap shot at the end.
 
[

There's a real simple explanation for "finger fuck" I sprained my wrist and I'm stuck typing with only one hand and it's making me crazy to type this slow.

Consequently I'm taking short cuts with words and phrases and "finger fuck" is a hell of a lot easier than continually typing in "vaginal penetration with his finger while kissing her all over".

Regarding the Judge. It was his open attack on what a piece of shit Woody was as a father that was astonishing.

I mean he ripped Woody a new asshole in his judgement.

Re: Dylan well hell's bells I've brought up the testimony of the babysitters, court documents and today I brought to the board a fabulous op ed of a professional child abuse investigator who really pointed out in this piece how horrifically this case was handled.

It's worth the read. I don't know if Dylan was molested or not. I only jumped in on the Dylan part to try to smack down those who were just rabidly going after Mia Farrow.

I mean hell's bells your babysitters employer calls you and tells you she saw Woody on his knees in front of Dylan with his head in her lap and then Dylan tells Mia what Daddy did, what the hell was Mia to do?

Ignore it? Tell the child she's imagining shit? Tell her she's a bad girl for making up lies?

I believe Mia did the only thing she could do. Take her to a doctor and have an investigation started.

Frankly I was just keeping to the "creepy" part of Soon Yi before certain individuals wanted to get into a dust up. I will always oblige :eusa_angel:

This really really worth the read.

Patrick Perion is a child abuse investigator in Illinois. In this article he gives his professional opinion on the Woody Allen/Dylan Farrow abuse case.
]

Your "professional" abuse investigator was not there, did not talk to any of the witnesses, and is just speculating on media reports. Therefore, he's really not very "professional".

But let's look at what we have as REAL evidence.

No Physical evidence.
Dylan couldn't keep her story straight when she talked to the first people who examined her at Yales.
Allen took a lie detector test and passed.
Moses Farrow has said nothing happened and his mother is batshit crazy.
The Prosecutor, as much as he wanted to, did not press charges.

But, hey, fuck all that kind of evidence and concepts of reasonable doubt.

let's hang him because we think his relationship with an adult (Soon-Yi) is creepy.

burning-at-the-stake.jpg

A valiant effort there JoeB. But all your points are so easily refutable. :eusa_angel: I love to argue and debate so here goes.

What physical evidence do you want? Dylan was very specific that she was only penetrated by her Father's fingers. There could be no semen. So how could there be physical evidence?

Moses didn't see anything? Seriously what the hell does that mean? How many brothers and sisters never knew that Daddy was targeting one of the family in sexual abuse cases? Happens all the time.

Moses is Johnny Nada. Of course he didn't see anything. Daddy didn't invite him to a front row seat did he now?

Re: Soon Yi For me she doesn't count in the sense that as perverse as it was, it has only to do with how the other children like Ronan feel about their father/brother in law and Soon Yi sister/step mother.

That's FUBAR'D no matter how you slice and dice it.

But and please duly note this, it factored into the Judge's judgement to give Farrow full custody.

Passing a lie dector test? :lmao: Give me a break.

Lie detector tests really mean jack shit. Do you know how many famous murderers have passed the polygraph with flying colors?

One of most famous killers who passed a polygraph and went on to kill and kill again was the Green River killer. Gary passed the test in '84 and he got to keep on killing till 2001.

And then polygraphs can nail the wrong person like it did with Floyd Fay where he failed two lie detector tests and was convicted for a murder he didn't commit.

Buzz made great use of his time in jail. Check it out.

The county prosecutors offered Buzz a deal: they would drop all charges if he agreed to take a polygraph - a lie detector test - to prove his innocence. Convinced the whole episode was one big mistake, Buzz readily agreed.

He took two tests but both suggested he was lying about his innocence. This, along with circumstantial evidence, sealed his 1979 conviction and he spent two-and-a-half years in prison for a murder he didn't commit.

During his time in prison, Buzz studied the polygraph. He sent his results to a number of experts but received wildly different interpretations.

Determined to show the test was fallible, he developed a training exercise to help people fool the lie detector and after just 15 minutes of instruction, 23 out of 27 inmates beat the polygraph.

Buzz was eventually exonerated, helped by the testimony of the real killer's mother, and his case has become one of the most notorious episodes in the history of the technology.

Vaughan Bell: the truth about lie detectors | Science | The Observer


And last but not least lets address Dylan's state of mind again shall we?. Because it also goes to why the Prosecutor decided not to proceed with the case.

And this expert can analyze how this situation from afar. Happens all the time for court cases. Experts don't have to be hands on to be able to diagnose the merits or failures of how a situation was handled.

And it was handled horridly by today's standards. Barbaric in fact. Brutal to make Dylan relive the situation over and over.

Weide makes quite a point that the Investigative Team of 3 doctors who conducted a 6-month investigation concluded that no sexual molestation happened.

They claimed in part that Dylan was an “emotionally disturbed child whose story became fixed in her head” or that she was coached or both.

They outlined inconsistencies in Dylan’s statement about being touched on the vaginal area.

The idea of a team of 3 doctors interviewing a frightened 7 year old child individually or as a group over 6 months is reprehensible.

There’s a reason we do one interview on tape. Asking Dylan to relive and retell the account of her abuse over and over again victimized her even further.

It’s not shocking that she said first she wasn’t touched, then she was, then she wasn’t. Children who are repeatedly interviewed about the same incident often change an answer to please the person doing the interview.

We see this in custody cases all the time. When the kids at mom’s they say they hate dad, when they’re at dad’s vice versa.

It’s not a giant leap to think that Dylan was confused and scared by these three adult men asking her questions about her private parts for SIX MONTHS.

It’s inconceivable to anyone who practices social work today. It’s entirely possible that she was “emotionally” disturbed because of the way she was dealt with by people who should have known better.

Many people, including Weide point out that medical examinations were done and there was no evidence of trauma to the anus or the vagina.

This doesn’t rule out molestation. In fact it doesn’t even rule out penetration. The vagina heals remarkably fast and any doctor who knows how to conduct a sexual abuse exam of a child will tell you that.


A Child Abuse Investigator's View of the Woody Allen/Dylan Farrow Case | The Daily Banter
 
Last edited:
A valiant effort there JoeB. But all your points are so easily refutable. :eusa_angel: I love to argue and debate so here goes.

What physical evidence do you want? Dylan was very specific that she was only penetrated by her Father's fingers. There could be no semen. So how could there be physical evidence?

Moses didn't see anything? Seriously what the hell does that mean? How many brothers and sisters never knew that Daddy was targeting one of the family in sexual abuse cases? Happens all the time.

Moses is Johnny Nada. Of course he didn't see anything. Daddy didn't invite him to a front row seat did he now?

Re: Soon Yi For me she doesn't count in the sense that as perverse as it was, it has only to do with how the other children like Ronan feel about their father/brother in law and Soon Yi sister/step mother.

That's FUBAR'D no matter how you slice and dice it.

But and please duly note this, it factored into the Judge's judgement to give Farrow full custody.

Passing a lie dector test? :lmao: Give me a break.

1) There would still be some physical evidence if he used his finger - abrasions, bruising etc - especially for a seven year old girl.
2) Moses didn't see anything, neither did the three nannies. Just because something 'didn't look right' doesn't mean anything happened.
3) Soon Yi was an adult when she made her decision. You may not like it, I sure find it weird, but it was her decision. 22 years later they are still together. As for the grooming, it is has been established that one of the reasons he got to know her as a young adult is that because Woody had hardly anything to do with Mia's kids and she encouraged him to do so.
4) While lie detector tests are not admissible in court for their unreliability they do add weight to me in that if you are willing to take the risk and fail one to prove your innocence then that says a lot about how strongly the person believes in their innocence. Note, Farrow refused to take one. Interesting, no?

And can you and Sunshine please stop with this 'defending Woody' hyperbole. None of us are defending him one iota. If he did it, he should pay. What we are defending is the flimsy - and ultimately dangerous - way in which you are trying to convict him. You are almost mirroring the image some people have formed their opinion over Farrow about. Shilling with no evidence or anything close that comes to proving his guilt.
 
To TinyDancer-

Does Woody Allen strike you as the kind of guy who could fool a lie detector test? The guy looks nervous all the time to start with. Now, yeah, that might be his public persona, but I just don't picture him as this stone cold liar.

Point was, this was investigated and the people who investigated it said nothing happened.

Now, are they all angry at Allen because of his behavior with Soon-Yi. Hell yeah. Are they anger that Mia's career is in the toilet and he's up for Oscar consideration... Probably.

But all you offer is a lot of accusations and no proof. I'm surprised you didn't offer spectral evidence.
 
:DI should have been a defense lawyer!

I like to defend men from snake ex-wives!

I should have been a great one too!

You might want to change your aspirations, at least until you can identify the difference between hearsay and direct evidence. The testimony of the victim is direct testimony and will support a guilty verdict in any court if subject to cross examination.
 
Woody sayin' it ain't so...
:eusa_eh:
Allen responds to Farrow's abuse claims in letter
7 Feb.`14 — Woody Allen is again denying he molested adoptive daughter Dylan Farrow and is calling ex-partner Mia Farrow vindictive, spiteful and malevolent in an open letter published online Friday by The New York Times.
The 78-year-old filmmaker says Dylan Farrow's open letter published last week by The New York Times includes "creative flourishes that seem to have magically appeared during our 21-year estrangement." "Of course, I did not molest Dylan," writes Allen. "I loved her and hope one day she will grasp how she has been cheated out of having a loving father and exploited by a mother more interested in her own festering anger than her daughter's well-being." Allen was investigated for the alleged molestation, but was never charged. A team of child abuse specialists from the Yale-New Haven Hospital, brought in to the case by prosecutors and police, concluded that Dylan Farrow had not been molested. "Now it's 21 years later and Dylan has come forward with the accusations that the Yale experts investigated and found false," Allen said. At the time of the breakup of their 12-year relationship more than two decades ago, Mia Farrow accused Allen of molesting Dylan Farrow. Allen has consistently denied the abuse allegation.

Their split followed the discovery of an affair between Allen and Mia Farrow's adopted daughter, Soon-Yi Previn, when she was 19 or 21. (Her official date of birth is uncertain.) Allen and Previn married in 1997 and have two adopted daughters. "I still loved (Dylan) deeply, and felt guilty that by falling in love with Soon-Yi I had put her in the position of being used as a pawn for revenge," Allen said. The "Annie Hall" and "Blue Jasmine" director again claims in his open letter that 7-year-old Dylan Farrow was coached by Mia Farrow. "Not that I doubt Dylan hasn't come to believe she's been molested, but if from the age of 7 a vulnerable child is taught by a strong mother to hate her father because he is a monster who abused her, is it so inconceivable that after many years of this indoctrination the image of me Mia wanted to establish had taken root?" Allen said.

Dylan Farrow claimed in her letter last week that in 1992 at the family's Connecticut home, Allen led her to a "dim, closet-like attic" and "then he sexually assaulted me." Dylan Farrow didn't specify Allen's actions, but described other abusive behavior. Allen said in his letter he believes Mia Farrow concocted those details, and they were inspired by the Dory Previn song "With My Daddy in the Attic." "Does the letter really benefit Dylan or does it simply advance her mother's shabby agenda?" Allen said. "That is to hurt me with a smear. There is even a lame attempt to do professional damage by trying to involve movie stars, which smells a lot more like Mia than Dylan."

In his letter, Allen recounts several anecdotes to call Mia Farrow's integrity into question. He also addressed the claim by Mia Farrow that her ex-husband Frank Sinatra could be the father of son Ronan Farrow, not Allen. "Even if he is not Frank's, the possibility she raises that he could be, indicates she was secretly intimate with him during our years," said Allen. "Not to mention all the money I paid for child support. Was I supporting Frank's son? Again, I want to call attention to the integrity and honesty of a person who conducts her life like that."

MORE
 
^^

"Again, I want to call attention to the integrity and honesty of a person who conducts her life like that."

That's a curious statement to make considering he started his affair with Mia Farrow's teenage daughter while he and Farrow were still a couple.
 
Woody Allen has always seemed creepy to me. I'm not familiar with his work because I could never get past the creep-factor long enough to give his movies a chance.
 
@Connery

And I have discussed it from the point of view of a clinician. Yet, they simply refuse to see reality.

When my children were VERY young and I was a stay at home mom, I saw a TV show about people who had been molested as children. They didn't have 'good touch bad touch' then, but the recommendation was to give children permission to decline to associate with anyone who made them feel uncomfortable. On the show it said that most victims knew something was wrong but did not leave the situation because the person was a family member or a trusted friend. That is what I did with my children. I told them that if ANYONE, no matter who it was, made them uncomfortable not to be around the person. Years later, my daughter told me of someone in my late husband's family she really felt was a creep and had avoided like the plague when she was very young because of what I told her would not stay around him. I was glad to know that. I don't know if he ever perpetrated anyone, but he was a sleaze bag.

Years later after I had been to school and was working I asked all of my patients who were survivors if they had any inkling that something was wrong. To the person, Just as on the show, they all said 'yes' but that the person was a trusted relative, family friend, bus driver, teacher, shopkeeper, neighbor, etc. Most of us have gut feelings. Few of us have permission to follow our gut feelings.

I recommend a book: The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker. Anyone who reads it will have no problem believing in and heeding their gut feelings about other people.

As we progress to the master's level as clinicians, we learn the models and theories, but we never forget that if we walk into a group of people and the hair on the back of our necks stands up, something is definitely wrong.


Thank you for your thoughtful post. In my various capacities scout leader, volunteer at my son's school etc I am around children a great deal and I am required to take numerous courses regarding some of the issues expressed in this thread. I have read what many people have said, I have taken in constructive posts such as yours and they gave me pause and time to reflect on different elements of Allen's behavior, Dylan's behavior and that of the family unit. I looked at this thread in a global way rather than the sole issue of Allen's guilt or innocence. In fact, I have not thought much about that , although I have tried to look at all the facts, circumstances etc. that were available.

One thing I do know...kid's can tell tales, kids have very active and vivid imaginations and kids can easily be manipulated by those they love and trust. IMO the telltale sign is in the behavior of the child and whether that behavior is aberrant or within normal parameters and from there with counseling the truth can be drawn out over time. Then perhaps the road to healing can traversed it is rife with pain, however, when the other end is reached the person may begin to feel whole.

@Connery

Yes, behaviors to tell the tale. When I was teaching I had a student come to my office as torn up as a can of kraut. Her daughter's behavior had changed. So, she got someone to help her log onto the computer using her daughter's password. When she did she learned that the girl and some of her friends had been lured into a teenage prostitution ring by some 50 year old men. My student contacted the FBI who came and got the computer. She received death threats and went through some really horrible stuff. But the men who were running this teenage prostitution ring were apprehended and shut down. It made national news.

If a parent waits until the child's behavior has changed they have waited too late because the abuse has already happened. The goal is to PREVENT the abuse, so the parent has to act preemptively and many parents just don't know to do that or don't think they can. Many still use the old 'don't take candy from strangers' method, and quite frankly most children just don't get that. If the parent dismisses what the child says out of hand, then the parent has failed the child. Children as young as 7 simply don't have the vocabulary or sexual knowledge to make stuff up. If a parent is coaching the child, and yes, that does happen in some bitter divorce cases, it is not difficult for the seasoned professional to tell because the child cannot deviate from the script the parent gave.

Courts are wising up and most states now have what is called a 'parenting plan.' In states that have those, a parent who disses the other parent or draws the child into a conspiratorial relationship such as making accusations of abuse which are not true can lose not only custody, but also visitation rights. In this day and age, using a child in this manner is going to backfire. When I lived in Nashville, the TN Supreme Court hired a psychologist for a 1 year term to write Tennessee's parenting plan. It has teeth in it.

The fact that in this particular case, the child, now an adult, has pursued the issue of her own accord and has clear symptomology really leaves very little doubt in my mind. It really takes courage for a victim to do something like an 'open letter' to a celeb parent. And, as we all can see, it really draws ire not only toward the person who wrote the letter, but to other members of the family. I believe the system failed this child. And I can tell you from years of practice that the system has failed many children in this country. That is how so many authority figures, not just parents, have gotten away with victimizing children in this country for so long. I hope the tide is turning, but the reality is that bringing a perp to justice remains a mine field for the victim. And the Constitution still gives the accused the right to look dead on in a court of law at the victim even when the victim is a child of tender years. That will not change, nor should it. But to refuse to pursue the perp because of the child's tender years denies that child the closure that he/she needs.

Well, I'm pretty well done with this thread. It is just the same asinine BS over and over with the usual suspects defending adults who victimize children. Cheers.
I don't blame you, Sunshine. I'm just surprised the thread hasn't been long forgotten.

I'm afraid we haven't seen the last of the pedophilia defenders online. While Woody's married to this helpless woman, they say he's having a free youngster sex-a-thon behind her back (or not).

The one thing is certain, though: he's the sex predator of youngsters with a history.

It's almost impossible to put a Hollywood star behind bars.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top