No. I don’t read Genesis literally. I read it allegorically. Because that’s how it is meant to be read.you read Genesis literallyDude, you read Genesis literally. I don't believe you should be throwing rocks at anyone's understanding of the Bible.Christians are never taught in context.Very different.You probably realize by now you have to study Tanakh in Hebrew...translations just won't do it.Too many non-facts or generalities being expressed.No more so than any one else who has conviction of belief. You and I do the same. I would expect anyone with conviction of belief to come off as confident in their beliefs. He's not acting like many of the assholes I see on the forum. And I see lots of assholes on this forum everyday.Definitely a touch of superiority going on.How do you know he hates religion? I didn't get that from him/her.There are a number of doublets in the stories because Israel and JudahEverything in the OT is exaggeratedSo what exactly are you trying to get at?They don’t know a lot more than they claim to know. They look at fragments of a past culture. No one knows the real history.Right, as if we’d have any idea or capability to determine a city’s population from 2,000 years ago within a few hundred people.
Archaeologist can tell a lot..
Have you been to Jerusalem.. The old city is quite small. They didn't have enough water and the land is very stony.. The north around Galilee and the Decapolis was more prosperous.
I follow Israeli archaeologist pretty closely for the past 40 years.. I have been to Jordan and Palestine several times so it interests me .Everything in the OT is exaggerated...
Prove it.
By the way, have you read the last 2 chapters of Deuteronomy?
Of course. Why? Do you think Moses wrote the Pentateuch? There are a number of doublets in the stories because Israel and Judah had different accounts that were cobbled together about the time of King Omri... and the origins of those stories are older from Sumer and the north Coast Canaanites. It doesn't diminish the value or the truth of the stories. But, they aren't history.
Proof?
Link?
and the origins of those stories are older from Sumer and the north Coast Canaanites
What makes you so certain other than your hatred of religion?
I have learned to keep my mouth shut until I consult someone whos knows the subject.
But they have to prove they know the subject.
You wouldn't believe the way people fake their way through Tanakh.
I have a very scholarly Jewish friend who helps me understand the Tanakh.. Its different than the Christian OT and IMO we get a lot of things dead wrong. I have a Muslim friend, a judge, who speaks and reads Amharic, Hebrew and Arabic.. and another who was a Catholic Chaplin. These guys are smart and very cool.
I hope you pay attention to every word, it's prefix and suffix and it's context within the verse.
You also know that the verses and chapters are artificial so the Church could argue with the Rabbis.
Heck, I'm still learning nuances after 50 years.
Don't be silly.. I'm not going to read it in Hebrew... Yes I know the verses and chapters are different.
What is the relationship between Tanakh and the findings and theories of an archeologist?
NOt different from archaeology ..Different from what Christians are taught.. Offhand I would say Hosea, Jeremiah and Isaiah.. I don't think Christians should fiddle with scripture.. It causes too much confusion.
Everything is a cherry picked verse.
I have yet to meet a Christian who has ever read Tanakh starting from Genesis 1:1.
Give me an example.
I have several hundred books on Chumash and I can interpret Genesis 1:1 in about 100 ways; more if I contemplate.