Women of America unite.....

[BrokeLoser]

Proud uncle, that has nothing to do with women's rights. And there's no babe in the womb it's a fetus until it breathes life into his lives independently it's a fetus you can change all the definitions you want you can't change facts.

I present to you...LefTard Logic 101:

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Rigby5]

.

Opinion | Has Texas Spelled the End of Abortion Rights in America? (Published 2021)

The answer depends on what Democrats do next.

www.nytimes.com

{...

Has Texas Spelled the End of Abortion Rights in America?​

Sept. 2, 2021

By Spencer Bokat-Lindell
Mr. Bokat-Lindell is a staff editor.

This article is part of the Debatable newsletter. You can sign up here to receive it on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
The Supreme Court late Wednesday night took a break from its summer recess to allow the most restrictive abortion law in the nation to take effect in Texas, raising alarm among people who support abortion rights — and even some who don’t.
Abortion access in the United States has been on the decline for many years now: The 2021 legislative season set a record for the most abortion restrictions signed into law in a single year in the United States, according to the Guttmacher Institute. So why is the Texas law different, and what does it portend for the future of abortion rights in the United States? Here’s what people are saying.

A very unusual law​

Known as Senate Bill 8, the Texas law prohibits doctors from performing abortions if a fetal heartbeat is detected, which is usually possible four weeks after conception, or just two weeks after a missed period. Because that is before many even know they are pregnant — and because the law makes no exceptions for rape or incest — it amounts to a nearly complete ban of abortion in Texas.

In its level of restriction, the Texas law is not unprecedented: Several states, including Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi and Ohio, have passed similar “heartbeat bills” in recent years.

But two Supreme Court precedents — Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that established a constitutional right to abortion, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the 1992 decision that affirmed that right — forbid states from banning abortion before a fetus reaches viability, or about 20 to 22 weeks after conception, so federal judges blocked those laws from taking effect.

The Texas law, however, was designed to avoid constitutional challenge. As The Times’s Adam Liptak explains, plaintiffs seeking to block a law on constitutional grounds would usually name state officials as defendants. But the Texas law bars state officials from enforcing it, effectively circumventing Roe v. Wade.

Instead, the law deputizes private individuals — including individuals outside Texas — to sue anyone who performs the procedure or “aids and abets” it. The patient may not be sued, but doctors, clinic staff, counselors, people who help pay for the procedure, even an Uber driver who takes a patient to an abortion clinic all could be. Plaintiffs, who do not need to have any connection to the abortion at issue, are entitled to at least $10,000 and attorney’s fees. Defendants, on the other hand, have to pay their own way even if they win.
...}

 

[MinTrut]

Define women for us...

Thread.

 

[Unkotare]

Of course.

Is a 30 year-old woman a human being?

 

[Thinker101]

Damn, didn't you loons decide it was "birthing persons"?

 

[San Souci]

In your fantasy it's murder, murder requires a person a citizen; sorry but a fetus doesn't qualify. And you're the last person to be a judge, you're way too emotional about this. It doesn't even concern you. You've made your choice let other women make theirs.

I choose not to condone mass murder.

 

[OKTexas]

Are you a f****** moron or what there's your link.

Poor little commie, you made some claims in the OP, it's on you to provide links to back them up. Or I guess you can just admit to being a total POS commie propagandist.

.

 

[Unkotare]

Of course. ...

Is a 10 year old girl a human being?

 

[OKTexas]

Opinion | Has Texas Spelled the End of Abortion Rights in America? (Published 2021)

The answer depends on what Democrats do next.

www.nytimes.com

{...

Has Texas Spelled the End of Abortion Rights in America?​

Sept. 2, 2021

By Spencer Bokat-Lindell
Mr. Bokat-Lindell is a staff editor.

This article is part of the Debatable newsletter. You can sign up here to receive it on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
The Supreme Court late Wednesday night took a break from its summer recess to allow the most restrictive abortion law in the nation to take effect in Texas, raising alarm among people who support abortion rights — and even some who don’t.
Abortion access in the United States has been on the decline for many years now: The 2021 legislative season set a record for the most abortion restrictions signed into law in a single year in the United States, according to the Guttmacher Institute. So why is the Texas law different, and what does it portend for the future of abortion rights in the United States? Here’s what people are saying.

A very unusual law​

Known as Senate Bill 8, the Texas law prohibits doctors from performing abortions if a fetal heartbeat is detected, which is usually possible four weeks after conception, or just two weeks after a missed period. Because that is before many even know they are pregnant — and because the law makes no exceptions for rape or incest — it amounts to a nearly complete ban of abortion in Texas.

In its level of restriction, the Texas law is not unprecedented: Several states, including Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi and Ohio, have passed similar “heartbeat bills” in recent years.

But two Supreme Court precedents — Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that established a constitutional right to abortion, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the 1992 decision that affirmed that right — forbid states from banning abortion before a fetus reaches viability, or about 20 to 22 weeks after conception, so federal judges blocked those laws from taking effect.

The Texas law, however, was designed to avoid constitutional challenge. As The Times’s Adam Liptak explains, plaintiffs seeking to block a law on constitutional grounds would usually name state officials as defendants. But the Texas law bars state officials from enforcing it, effectively circumventing Roe v. Wade.

Instead, the law deputizes private individuals — including individuals outside Texas — to sue anyone who performs the procedure or “aids and abets” it. The patient may not be sued, but doctors, clinic staff, counselors, people who help pay for the procedure, even an Uber driver who takes a patient to an abortion clinic all could be. Plaintiffs, who do not need to have any connection to the abortion at issue, are entitled to at least $10,000 and attorney’s fees. Defendants, on the other hand, have to pay their own way even if they win.
...}

I was already aware of that propaganda, you got a link to back up this statement in the OP, he doesn't seem to.

In the very near future, when the world is hopelessly overpopulated, they could use the same law to say you must have an abortion.

.

 

[Unkotare]

Of course. .....

Is a five year old girl a human?

 

[Papageorgio]

Proud uncle, that has nothing to do with women's rights. And there's no babe in the womb it's a fetus until it breathes life into his lives independently it's a fetus you can change all the definitions you want you can't change facts.

According to science, the baby, is a life, you can change all the definitions you want but you can’t change facts.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Women of America unite, your rights are under attack. This ridiculous abortion law in Texas targets you. I don't care if you're anti-abortion or pro-abortion. What you do now will determine your rights in the future, all of your rights. If you are allow government to do this to you. Abortion is a bad choice at best, but it should always be your choice. Prevention isn't always possible. Rape and incest are never a choice. Right now these Representatives want to use the law to prevent abortions. In the very near future, when the world is hopelessly overpopulated, they could use the same law to say you must have an abortion. This should always be your choice. Live Free or die that is the question facing you now.

You're an idiot

 

[Independent thinker]

Women of America unite, your rights are under attack. This ridiculous abortion law in Texas targets you. I don't care if you're anti-abortion or pro-abortion. What you do now will determine your rights in the future, all of your rights. If you are allow government to do this to you. Abortion is a bad choice at best, but it should always be your choice. Prevention isn't always possible. Rape and incest are never a choice. Right now these Representatives want to use the law to prevent abortions. In the very near future, when the world is hopelessly overpopulated, they could use the same law to say you must have an abortion. This should always be your choice. Live Free or die that is the question facing you now.

LOL. So, you are trying to convince women who are against abortion that this will lead to all of their rights being taken away? Good luck with that. They are not as stupid as those who try claiming this utter nonsense.

 

[sartre play]

Maybe people who will NEVER have to face the possibility of being in that position should stay out of the fight.

 

[HappyJoy]

If abortion is murder then how come the new Texas law doesn't treat it as such? Doesn't even attempt to.

 

[Donald H]

If this nonsense of preventing women from having abortions doesn't stop, America will suffer the very uncomfortable consequences!

Just one more ignorant policy that is driving America back to third world status.
And all for the sake of the imaginary man in the sky.

 

[d0gbreath]

There have always been, and will always be abortions. My girlfriend got hers two years before Roe vs. Wade.

The wealthy will travel to places where the procedure is legal and the poor girl will say: "Stomp on my stomach and we'll say that I fell down the stairs."

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If this nonsense of preventing women from having abortions doesn't stop, America will suffer the very uncomfortable consequences!

Just one more ignorant policy that is driving America back to third world status.
And all for the sake of the imaginary man in the sky.

Well, look at how many trillions we spent with this imaginary concept that man can control the climate.

 

[HappyJoy]

Well, look at how many trillions we spent with this imaginary concept that man can control the climate.

Way off topic.