Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
So, even more government.Health care. Child care. Make so she doesn't worry about being homeless for missing work. To start.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, even more government.Health care. Child care. Make so she doesn't worry about being homeless for missing work. To start.
So, even more government.
I'm just asking if that is what you are advocating.Chuckling over Maga condemning a bigger government. Lol
I'm just asking if that is what you are advocating.
If you don't want to answer, that's fine. No need to deflect.
If you can prove that increasing welfare leads to fewer abortions, then the debate might be a little different.I am all for helping women if it saves the lives of the unborn.
You?
If you can prove that increasing welfare leads to fewer abortions, then the debate might be a little different.
Until then, you are just another statist advocating for wealth transfer and as usual hiding behind children as the excuse.
It's also in line with the right's war on women, Republicans jeopardizing the health and lives of women.
If that was true MAGA wouldn't be trying to make them jump through additional hoops to vote.
I'm sure some women do want an abortion due to the costs. I'm sure some women want an abortion because they are convinced that their baby will grow up to be the anti-Christ. Doesn't mean it makes sense.So no women ever chooses abortion over the costs of having a baby?
No women ever wonders how she will work and care for a baby?
More deflection.So no, I guess. Bombs, hurray though.
I'm sure some women do want an abortion due to the costs. I'm sure some women want an abortion because they are convinced that their baby will grow up to be the anti-Christ. Doesn't mean it makes sense.
I can't make the leap to say that increasing welfare will lead to fewer abortions. That is too counter-factual given that both welfare and abortions increased dramatically between the Johnson era and the W. era. Is there any study anywhere linking increased welfare with decreased abortions?
There is so much financial assistance available to women with babies whose income is below the poverty level and in many cases well above the poverty level, that a woman thinking she will have an abortion to avoid expenses needs financial counseling (and birth control), not more free stuff.
More deflection.
This is the knee-jerk reaction of the American socialist. To recommend "more free stuff!" as the solution to every problem, and to deflect when asked to defend that stance.
I take it you now abandon your position about abortion.More free stuff......a billion dollars a day to appease a psychopath.
I take it you now abandon your position about abortion.