The World Voted for Women’s Rights. The United States Voted No.

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
115,692
Reaction score
149,191
Points
3,645
This is for all you white MAGAT females defending your right to be white. You live in the only nation that voted against women's rights.

The World Voted for Women’s Rights. The United States Voted No.​


On March 9, 2026, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, the United States was the only country in the world to vote against a United Nations document affirming women’s rights. Thirty-seven countries voted yes, six abstained, and one country voted no: the United States of America. This happened at the 70th session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, the body created in 1946 to advance equality and the rights of women and girls around the world. For decades, governments have negotiated and adopted what are called the “Agreed Conclusions,” a framework outlining international commitments to protect women from discrimination, violence, and exclusion from justice.

And I want to pause on that for a second, because the document itself was not radical. It focused on access to justice for women and girls and called for repealing discriminatory laws, strengthening legal protections, improving accountability for violence against women, and making sure women can actually access courts and public institutions without discrimination. It addressed workplace discrimination, gender-based violence, and the growing risks posed by technologies that can deepen gender harm. These commitments reflect decades of international agreements that governments, including the United States, helped write and defend.

And yet under the Trump regime the United States tried to weaken them. During negotiations the U.S. delegation introduced amendments aimed at stripping or weakening language connected to gender equality frameworks and women’s rights protections that have been part of global agreements for years. Eight amendments were proposed and all eight failed. When those efforts collapsed, the United States forced a recorded vote on the document, something that almost never happens at this commission because these agreements have historically passed by consensus. For decades, governments understood that women’s rights were not supposed to be treated like a partisan bargaining chip or an ideological battlefield.

That tradition was broken. When the vote was called, thirty-seven countries supported the document, six abstained, and the United States stood alone as the only government in the world to vote against it.

 
This is for all you white MAGAT females defending your right to be white. You live in the only nation that voted against women's rights.

The World Voted for Women’s Rights. The United States Voted No.​


On March 9, 2026, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, the United States was the only country in the world to vote against a United Nations document affirming women’s rights. Thirty-seven countries voted yes, six abstained, and one country voted no: the United States of America. This happened at the 70th session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, the body created in 1946 to advance equality and the rights of women and girls around the world. For decades, governments have negotiated and adopted what are called the “Agreed Conclusions,” a framework outlining international commitments to protect women from discrimination, violence, and exclusion from justice.

And I want to pause on that for a second, because the document itself was not radical. It focused on access to justice for women and girls and called for repealing discriminatory laws, strengthening legal protections, improving accountability for violence against women, and making sure women can actually access courts and public institutions without discrimination. It addressed workplace discrimination, gender-based violence, and the growing risks posed by technologies that can deepen gender harm. These commitments reflect decades of international agreements that governments, including the United States, helped write and defend.

And yet under the Trump regime the United States tried to weaken them. During negotiations the U.S. delegation introduced amendments aimed at stripping or weakening language connected to gender equality frameworks and women’s rights protections that have been part of global agreements for years. Eight amendments were proposed and all eight failed. When those efforts collapsed, the United States forced a recorded vote on the document, something that almost never happens at this commission because these agreements have historically passed by consensus. For decades, governments understood that women’s rights were not supposed to be treated like a partisan bargaining chip or an ideological battlefield.

That tradition was broken. When the vote was called, thirty-seven countries supported the document, six abstained, and the United States stood alone as the only government in the world to vote against it.



“Women’s rights” are the single biggest mistake in our history.

Repeal the 19th.


By the way, can you even define what a woman is?
 
“Women’s rights” are the single biggest mistake in our history.

Repeal the 19th.


By the way, can you even define what a woman is?
Yep. The definition of a woman is a human being who has the same rights as a man. Your first sentence shows that you are also a sexist/misogynist. You define a woman as less than human.
 
This is for all you white MAGAT females defending your right to be white. You live in the only nation that voted against women's rights.

The World Voted for Women’s Rights. The United States Voted No.​


On March 9, 2026, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, the United States was the only country in the world to vote against a United Nations document affirming women’s rights. Thirty-seven countries voted yes, six abstained, and one country voted no: the United States of America. This happened at the 70th session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, the body created in 1946 to advance equality and the rights of women and girls around the world. For decades, governments have negotiated and adopted what are called the “Agreed Conclusions,” a framework outlining international commitments to protect women from discrimination, violence, and exclusion from justice.

And I want to pause on that for a second, because the document itself was not radical. It focused on access to justice for women and girls and called for repealing discriminatory laws, strengthening legal protections, improving accountability for violence against women, and making sure women can actually access courts and public institutions without discrimination. It addressed workplace discrimination, gender-based violence, and the growing risks posed by technologies that can deepen gender harm. These commitments reflect decades of international agreements that governments, including the United States, helped write and defend.

And yet under the Trump regime the United States tried to weaken them. During negotiations the U.S. delegation introduced amendments aimed at stripping or weakening language connected to gender equality frameworks and women’s rights protections that have been part of global agreements for years. Eight amendments were proposed and all eight failed. When those efforts collapsed, the United States forced a recorded vote on the document, something that almost never happens at this commission because these agreements have historically passed by consensus. For decades, governments understood that women’s rights were not supposed to be treated like a partisan bargaining chip or an ideological battlefield.

That tradition was broken. When the vote was called, thirty-seven countries supported the document, six abstained, and the United States stood alone as the only government in the world to vote against it.


An actual link to the document, and I see the big issue, is that the declaration links to things the US doesn't agree with.

Document Viewer

The Commission reiterates that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 4the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women 5and the Convention on the Rights of the Child,6and the Optional Protocols thereto,7as well as other relevant conventions and treaties, such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 8 the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 9 the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 10 the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination 11and the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families12

So they tried to sneak an open borders proposal in. I'm sure I'll find other poison pill bullshit if I look further.
 
An actual link to the document, and I see the big issue, is that the declaration links to things the US doesn't agree with.

Document Viewer



So they tried to sneak an open borders proposal in. I'm sure I'll find other poison pill bullshit if I look further.
Yup!
All Migrant Workers
Includes illegal aliens, illegal border crossers ...

Once again Marxist/Leftist 'IM2' has to distort and misrepresent to make his biased point.
 
Back
Top Bottom