- Nov 26, 2011
- 123,664
- 57,964
- 2,290
MMM is a troll.Holy shit! You are a fucking seething mess. Did your head just spin around 360 while projectile vomiting pea soup? YOU need to beput away somewhere!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
MMM is a troll.Holy shit! You are a fucking seething mess. Did your head just spin around 360 while projectile vomiting pea soup? YOU need to beput away somewhere!
I have already shown you they do.THE UNBORN HAVE NO RIGHTS!!!
Really? I would be interested to know what those reasons are. You might recall that during the protracted legal fight where the states tried to make a case against gay marriage, they failed miserably in their attempts to establish a compelling government interest or even a rational basis to ban the practice.I agree, even though there are secular reasons to be opposed to Same Sex marriage
Nope.That gays have a higher rate of child molestation is fact, not opinion, stupid racist schmuck.
And what's wrong with that - if the people of a state don't think interracial marriage is appropriate?And what's wrong with that- if the people of a state don't think gay marriage is appropriate?
So we should all be forced to recognize a union between members of different races as a marriage?So we should all be forced to recognize a union between members of the same sex as a marriage?
Why do you feel forcing your beliefs on the rest of us is not a form of authoritarianism?
You have no idea how unbelievably stupid your post sounds, do you.And why should people get rights based on their sexual preference and living arrangements?
Hmm?
I thought we all should have the same freedoms.
Blacks have always had the right to get married-to a black.Homosexuals have always had the right to get married- to a dame like anyone else.
Not any special rights.
The discriminatory practice was the Court usurping the rights of the states. I oppose federal overreach.You're not concerned about interracial marriage./ Well, if you're concerned about the courts redefining marriage you should be. If they redefined marriage with Obergefell, they do so with Loving as well. But the issue in both case is not redefining marriage, it is about correcting a discriminatory practice.
The government grants a thousand benefits to married people. Would you like those removed just to keep gays from getting them?Why should the state be in marriage at all?
Hmm?
Children and animals cannot give consent.Its not stupid at all
If same sex marriage is ok with libs then why not marriage with animals or children?
Not because I say so. Do you even understand the term enumerated right? Doesn't seem that way.Because you say so? Appela to authority logical fallacy
Interracial sex acts are immoral and harmful no matter how you try to spin it.Killing little babies in the womb is immoral no matter how you try to spin it. Gay sex acts are immoral and harmful no matter how you try to spin it.
Thank you. Amen.BTW: Abortion is not health care because pregnancy is not an illness!
It is a federal issue because the federal government bestows, through law, a boatload of cash and prizes to married people.While I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, it is not a federal issue any more than abortion.
I am a conservative. I am glad Roe v. Wade was overturned! I will never claim that
God is on my side, but I like to think that I am on God's side! I know that when I get to Heaven, I will meet all the souls of all the abortions that have been committed especially since 1973.
Do you understand penumbras of the constitution? Have you even heard of it?Not because I say so. Do you even understand the term enumerated right? Doesn't seem that way.