danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #341
Oh, look; a right-winger with nothing but ad hominems. How customary and usual for the right-wing instead of having any valid arguments for rebuttal.Look!
DP, the greedy retard clicked the Smiley!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh, look; a right-winger with nothing but ad hominems. How customary and usual for the right-wing instead of having any valid arguments for rebuttal.Look!
DP, the greedy retard clicked the Smiley!
You forget that we get the "biggest bang for our buck" by solving simple poverty since the Poor tend to spend (circulate) most of their income and engage in less tax avoidance than the Rich. And, there is no other place that can achieve a multiplier of two, except in right-wing fantasy.
That is just You assuming that conclusion. Where are they going to get another income without a job?
Because it is up to the People and Individual Liberty to not stay in poverty. It really is that "efficient" as an economic stabilizer because it is the individuals themselves exercising their Liberty instead of Government infringing on their privileges and immunities and demanding a work ethic like any Communists.Once again, why do you think that unemployment compensation will solve simple poverty, when decades of welfare has not? Is means testing the reason for poverty?
How would it happen with unemployment compensation? Simply reporting income would reduce unemployment benefits and making money from employment should end the need for unemployment compensation.There has been documented fraud in the welfare system for years, even with means testing. Your assumption that every poor person is honest is heat warming, but naive.
How would it happen with unemployment compensation? Simply reporting income would reduce unemployment benefits and making money from employment should end the need for unemployment compensation.
Because it is up to the People and Individual Liberty to not stay in poverty. It really is that "efficient" as an economic stabilizer because it is the individuals themselves exercising their Liberty instead of Government infringing on their privileges and immunities and demanding a work ethic like any Communists.
That happens now. No change necessary.Simply reporting income? So the person receiving the benefits would be in control of whether or not their benefits are reduced?
Corporate welfare is alive and well and has even paid out multimillion dollar bonuses. Why only complain about the Poor?Oh? Up to the people and individual liberty? How about the people take responsibility for their own lives? You know, by getting a job.
I, and most people, do not mind helping people who NEED the help. But having my tax dollars used to fund someone's life who doesn't need it and will not lift a finger for their own sake? That is just robery.
That happens now. No change necessary.
Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States would reserve some labor and should cause wages to go up since Capitalists still need labor to make a profit.People working full time jobs making less than 40k per year should get monetary help.
More honest than those who simply evade taxes or avoid taxes while Rich.And I am sure all of those people reporting their income are 100% honest.
Corporate welfare is alive and well and has even paid out multimillion dollar bonuses. Why only complain about the Poor?
More honest than those who simply evade taxes or avoid taxes while Rich.
You only seem to complain about equal protection of the laws for the Poor in these threads.I don't. I have complained about corporate welfare and bailouts for years.
I am not complaining about paying taxes to help those who need it. I am complaining about paying taxes to give money to those who do not need it. Why should I work to pay someone when they will not work to support themselves.
We have a First Amendment, your morals mean nothing. Only ethics matter. Equal protection of the laws is ethical and a requirement in our several Constitutions.Fine. Go after those rich who cheat on their taxes. But rather than do that, you want the gov't to take taxes from workers and give them to people who may or may not need the money, and who refuse to work to support themselves.
If your life is not important enough to work to support, why would it be for me?
You only seem to complain about equal protection of the laws for the Poor in these threads.
You are the one who seems to have a problem with equal protection of the laws when it is about the Poor.No, I do not complain about equal protection of laws for the poor. And the only time this discussion has talked about anyone else has been you making disparaging remarks about the rich.