Yes, I want Trump out of the WH. Do I think the process of effecting that end is fun? Hell no! Sadism does not appeal to me.
Well, for myself, I DO consider "fun" the upcoming downfall of a wanna-be despot;it confirms for me that our system of checks-n-balances and rules of law STILL function to kick out charlatans from the oval office.
Assuming you actually understand the implications of what you're saying, holding such a notion, though every bit your right, reflects unfathomably-to-me myopia, selfishness and a sick revelry for discord.
The fact of the matter is that Trump is the POTUS. As such, though we see in him both a man and an office -- we do that everyday when we chide Trump for "being Trump" -- we must not rational in pondering separating the man from the office he holds, ignore the fact that doing so has significance beyond merely removing him from office and that the people's confidence in the marrow of the Office of the President of the U.S. and the processes that allow one to obtain it will pale unavoidably and materially. Impeaching and removing a POTUS from office is a political matter, but it is also much more than that.
Moreover, because Trump will likely resist at every turn the processes that could well lead to his removal from office, the diminution plausibly will have a more deleterious impact on the Office of the POTUS than have past such forays. Trump's not unique in that regard, but, in my estimation, he differs from Nixon and Clinton in that (1) he truly considers himself infallible, (2) he views the Presidency and his being POTUS though monarchical lens, and thus (3) he has no conception that what's good for the nation is superior to what's good for him; thus his resistance, unlike those other men's will entail his "salting the earth," as it were, in the course of his demise. We see that already in his incessantly prideful impugning of the press, the judiciary, the USIC, the FBI and honorable individuals who work in each of those institutions and happen to disagree with him.
I'm not willing to here to expound upon all the details of why I think that of your (or anyone's) finding the "take down" of a POTUS fun; however, I will point you to a text--
An Affair of State: The Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton -- that, regardless of one's concurrence with the author's ultimate conclusions (those conclusions are irrelevant for the "bigger picture" discussion in which you and I presently engage), identifies quite clearly the material, enduring and negative impacts the country and the deterioration of confidence its people suffer in the wake of being taken down the road of impeaching and removing from office a POTUS. I will, however summarize them.
- The presidential impeachment and removal from office (I&R) process calls attention not only to the transgressions of the person holding the office of the POTUS, but also it highlights the inadequacy of the judiciary, the political process, the Congress, the legal profession, and the academic community to anticipate and interdict novel challenges.
- The I&R process highlights the our constitution's permeability to political disagreements, thus fragility of the American experiment, whereby the "soft subjects" (history and law) one which it depends endure bereft of universal "agreement on the methods for resolving disagreement [and thus] enables consensus to be forged despite the differing political agendas of the practitioners" of hard science. This failure is symptomatic of history and law in contrast to a "hard" field (such as physics) in which theorists reason to "divergent conclusions from shared premises."
- The I&R process' key players will, as they did in the 1990s, fail to emphasize the importance of the rule of law in general and of telling the truth in depositions and in testimony before a grand jury, in particular.
- The I&R process, as before with Clinton and as we now observe from Trump and his legal team, elevate to even greater levels of acceptability "quibbling, hair-splitting equivocation, brazen denial of the obvious, truncated quotation and quotation out of context, and mischaracterization of the law"...and will do so to a citizenry already over enthralled with and beset by discord deriving from irrationality.
Those things being consequences of the I&R process are not in and of themselves vexing, dismaying or troublesome. Despite along with having numerous failures laid before it, for example, the public becomes somewhat more informed, differently so but no less imperfectly so, about law, ethics, and politics, at least for the short term. Additionally, the I&R "demonstrated the resilience of the American government. For despite everything, government will tick along in its usual way through the months of so-called crisis.
It is the reactionary response to having the American legal dicta and political process' underbelly revealed that painful. Revealing skeletons in the closet of America's jurisprudencial structure, political figures, and political operations combine to make the sovereignty, as a whole both stronger and weaker; however, following a successfully undertaken I&R process ("successful" including a POTUS' resigning the face of imminent impeachment and/or removal) the polity responds by acting to stitch the gaps that allowed the transgressions to happen in the first place. While it's normal to desire doing so, actually doing so increases the scope of political and authoritative impotence any future holders of the office of the POTUS face while providing no attendant reduction in the expectations placed on those holders. Furthermore, being yet another thing political and about which citizens may disagree, the ostensibly corrective process exacerbates the nature and extent of schism among the polity.
That said, I do not find that the painful impacts of the overall I&R process militate in Trump's case for refraining from undertaking it. Trump, like Bill Clinton did, deserves the blame and excoriation he receives for violating the executive and exemplary ethical duties of his office. The former are his executive and administrative duties, which can only be executed successfully by someone with credibility. The latter include his duties to serve as a role model, to preserve the dignity of his office, and to avoid scandal and the appearance thereof. Trump's profligate disingenuousness and dissembling, and his attempts to obfuscate as much both denude further the mystique of the Presidency and constitute part of a powerful case for his impeachment and Senatorial conviction.
I see the I&R process' impacts, somewhat as I see chemotherapy or excision, as consequences that nobody having any real concern for the country would take pleasure in wishing for or inflicting upon any one person, let alone hundreds of millions of people. Asserting that one will take pleasure in watching the I&R process is the political and governance analogue to saying not only for oneself but also to one's countrymen "I bid you bad health, painful treatment, debilitating recovery and a compromised existentiality at the end of it all."
Often enough I concur with some of themes you express and ends you desire here, yet I see now there is a clear difference between us. While you can, no matter how desirous I am to see Trump leave the WH, I cannot brook being constituted of the obdurate selfishness and wanton truculence needed to take pleasure in seeing a POTUS impeached and/or removed from office.
Edit/Note:
Additional resources on the matter of the I&R process and its impacts: