Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TRANSLATION: Consistently liberal coverageOf course, it was reporting by the Associated Press, and they consistently do a good job on their journalism.
"You get that?" you're the most unabashed practitioner of that, should read "I am guilty of it that"...would you oppose a required link to Fox news in lieu?To be sure, there will be folks who don't like such reports because it may cast shade on some fav-du-jour they currently admire. I get that.
ahhh the shackles of propaganda, one source fits all...let freedom ring eh ChillsNonetheless, this forum could do a lot worse (too often does a lot worse) than requiring links to the AP.
IMHO?...try "IMO" it's a better fitIMHO
Right, no crimes.Trump hasn't committed any crimes. If he had, the billions of dollars that the libs wasted on Fake investigations wouldn't have turned up bupkis.
Take the 5th? The choice could soon be Trump's in NY probe
To plead the Fifth or not to plead the Fifth. That's the question facing Donald Trump after a New York judge Thursday ordered the former president to testify in a long-running state civil investigation into his business practices.apnews.com
Of course he won't; he absolutely will not!! In the past he has derided the 5th claiming that it proves guilt and that "the mob takes the 5th.
Besides, Trump is a stand up guy who is totally innocent, so he says. Therefore he would have no problem with truthfully answering "witch hunt" questions, and, I am sure, would insist that his kids do the same.
What...are you writing a book?...holy cow...First, I want to thank the OP.
It was a good article that he linked the forum to.
I thought it was fair, informative, and added context to the news of the judge's ruling.
Of course, it was reporting by the Associated Press, and they consistently do a good job on their journalism. To be sure, there will be folks who don't like such reports because it may cast shade on some fav-du-jour they currently admire. I get that.
Nonetheless, this forum could do a lot worse (too often does a lot worse) than requiring links to the AP.
IMHO
-----------------------------------------------------------
And that leads my avatar to some recreational commentary on several subjects, and several posts.
First, this ...from the AP article itself:
“The problem with appearing — at least as his lawyers will see it — is that Trump can’t be controlled and he’s likely to say things that will cause more trouble for him and his family.”
Contributors to this venue will recognize that concept. It has been surfaced in any number of threads in the past. DTrump, seemingly, has a proclivity to shoot his mouth off....to his detriment. And worse, he then re-loads....to get the other foot.
---------------------------------------------------
"180,000" ???
Paint me skeptical.
I believe the poster Rambunctious is in error. Either due to failure of due diligence, or he made up the number as he believes it advances the interests of his polemic.
So, let's do this: Let's ask the good poster to show us credible, authoritative sourcing for the "180,000" number.
If the good poster Rambunctious cannot, will not, does not....well, the clear conclusions must be that he is either careless, or incompetent, or mendacious.
Batter up, poster Rambunctious.
It's Show or Go time.
-------------------------------------------------------
Well, actually, poster Polishprince.....in this particualr situation, it ain't a 'trial-in-the-media'. Rather, this is a legal subpoena, and a judge's ruling, in our courts of law. Generally, that has significant precedent over any 'trial-by-the-media'.
Trust me.
--------------------------------------------------
Oh boy!
Yet another Nazi war crime comparison.
A wrong one on the facts.
But a right one for showcasing some poster's ignorance of history, and his willingness to trivialize and minimize the tragedy of the Holocaust and Nazi tyranny.
Look, I'm gonna be uncharacteristically blunt with the good poster 'whitehall': Partner, your ignorance makes your avatar look silly, juvenile, irresponsible, and scatter-brained. Uneducated or under-educated.
In short, your avatar does not know what it is he is talking about. Nor does he comprehend the inappropriateness and the insensitivity of equating the supremely tragic deaths of nearly 20 million people in World War II, to the sad misteps of well meaning American leaders in their attempts to address a novel and advancing pandemic.
The whitehall avatar made a silly and ignorant statement in his attempt to advance his partisan polemic.
This forum deserves a better contribution. And expects one.
------------------------------------
Sure...lets bet...a former president dragged into court?...not gonna happen...even the elected dems don't want to set that precedent...especially with how corrupt the dems are....Care to bet?
Right, no crimes.
What...are you writing a book?
My avatar??? what about my avatar?...if you have doubt in my post look it up....Book? Oh no, not at all.
Rather, I was inquiring if your avatar could back up his word....be reliable in what he claims?
That was my intent with the query on the "180,000" number.
Which, obviously, brings us right back to the original query: Can you prove it?
Can you support it?
Do you have a credible authoritative source?
Or, did you simply imagine it in order to project an aura of an 'in-the-know' trait you think you may need to debate effectively?
only the treatment of the elderly by each was a comparison chills,[something you saw no need to deny] the deaths [whether right or wrong] were "merely" a quantified measurementOh boy!
Yet another Nazi war crime comparison.
which in your opinion are?A wrong one on the facts.
why don't ya just call him a Trudeau wannabe and be done with it?But a right one for showcasing some poster's ignorance of history, and his willingness to trivialize and minimize the tragedy of the Holocaust and Nazi tyranny.
Stupid rally's?...like the one last month with over 180,000 people attending?..
Conroe, TX, 1/29/22: "tens of thousands"if you have doubt in my post look it up....
heavy.com
www.businessinsider.com
"Brandon?"Just because you say that Trump is a racketeer doesn't mean that he is.
But I guess if you are devoted to Brandon, its important to get him elected by any means necessary.
It’s not a criminal trial he’s be testifying in, so don’t get your hopes up.Take the 5th? The choice could soon be Trump's in NY probe
To plead the Fifth or not to plead the Fifth. That's the question facing Donald Trump after a New York judge Thursday ordered the former president to testify in a long-running state civil investigation into his business practices.
Of course he won't; he absolutely will not!! In the past he has derided the 5th claiming that it proves guilt and that "the mob takes the 5th.
Besides, Trump is a stand up guy who is totally innocent, so he says. Therefore he would have no problem with truthfully answering "witch hunt" questions, and, I am sure, would insist that his kids do the same.
I see you and the choir have had a week to rehearse.Absolutely.
Who do you think is behind these false accusations against President Trump?
This is just like Hillary and Mueller's lies about Trump hiring hoes to ruin hotel mattresses.
A load of shit.
Yea, a “criminal investigation” that has produced absolutely nothing.It is also a criminal investigation. Folks like you spend too much time in your mommas basement; https://www.usnews.com/news/busines...jury-seated-as-trump-criminal-probe-continues
And his problems in Georgia as well.It is also starting to look likely that Trump will be charged with a crime for mishandling classified documents.
Yet his statements under oath can and will be used against him in their criminal investigation.It’s not a criminal trial he’s be testifying in, so don’t get your hopes up.
Just like every criminal investigation in history...until they did produce something.Yea, a “criminal investigation” that has produced absolutely nothing.
Thanks for proving my last post.Yet his statements under oath can and will be used against him in their criminal investigation.
Which is why orange pussyboi will plead the 5th in the civil deposition.
If he has any brains left, anyway. Which, he may not.
Yep.And his problems in Georgia as well.
