Will Republicans end social security?

Will Republicans end social security?

  • Yes, at least try

    Votes: 35 28.2%
  • No

    Votes: 89 71.8%

  • Total voters
    124
Whether any of that is true… where do you suppose that buyout comes from?

Yea but maybe the government thinks it's cheaper to give us buy outs. Those buy outs will be based on your age and how much you put in.

I suspect Republicans would take a very small buy out and screw themselves. Democrats would say **** that give me my social security when Retire. You'll figure out a way to come up with the money. Get it from Elon Musk.
 
How are they even still on the rolls

So I'm going to take this as a serious question.

OK, I'm an information system guy.

So a "person" is an entity - unique "parent" record. That entity has various characteristics such as name, SSN, date of birth, date of death, etc. There there are child records, for example earnings reports received over the persons career.

You NEVER really delete information from a database like this. You WANT the old data because it's used for more than just paying benefits. There may be challenges to benefit awards from an estate, the data is useful for research, etc.

What happened is that Musk focused one field "Death Flag set to FALSE" and he and Trump have spun this into:

Death Flag set to FALSE means paying benefits. This is false.

Death Flag set to False != Receiving Benefits (Spoken, that logic would read "Death flag set to false DOES NOT mean receiving benefits".

A payment issued (for example December 2024 when SS Retirement payments equaled 89,106) means "receiving benefits".

There are not millions and millions of people over 100 receiving SS Retirement. Just ain't happening.

WW
 
So I'm going to take this as a serious question.

OK, I'm an information system guy.

So a "person" is an entity - unique "parent" record. That entity has various characteristics such as name, SSN, date of birth, date of death, etc. There there are child records, for example earnings reports received over the persons career.

You NEVER really delete information from a database like this. You WANT the old data because it's used for more than just paying benefits. There may be challenges to benefit awards from an estate, the data is useful for research, etc.

What happened is that Musk focused one field "Death Flag set to FALSE" and he and Trump have spun this into:

Death Flag set to FALSE means paying benefits. This is false.

Death Flag set to False != Receiving Benefits (Spoken, that logic would read "Death flag set to false DOES NOT mean receiving benefits".

A payment issued (for example December 2024 when SS Retirement payments equaled 89,106) means "receiving benefits".

There are not millions and millions of people over 100 receiving SS Retirement. Just ain't happening.

WW
The scary thing is Elon knew this was false before he said it. How do I know that? Because Trump continues to spread the fake news last night. Knowing it's been debunked. This is just like they're eating the dogs. Doesn't have to be true. It's effective on the American public. Because we are stupid. Really ******* stupid.
 
Look who's talking! There is insurmountable evidence that the government has been covering up or lying to us on multiple fronts and you still faithfully hang on their every word. The true cult is the Trump Hater Cult.
"Insurmountable?"
Why not show us a link to this "evidence" then.
I'm not talking about WH statements or rando claims from the Nazi Afrikaneer pimp who bought Trump.
If this "evidence" is really insurmountable produce it.
I'll wait.
 
Why wouldn't it? From the employer's perspective, it makes no difference whether the money they're paying for an employee goes into the employee's pocket, or is snatched up by the state. Their outlay is the same either way. The same bottom line.
nothing stops them from just pocketing that 3%
 
So I'm going to take this as a serious question.

OK, I'm an information system guy.

So a "person" is an entity - unique "parent" record. That entity has various characteristics such as name, SSN, date of birth, date of death, etc. There there are child records, for example earnings reports received over the persons career.

You NEVER really delete information from a database like this. You WANT the old data because it's used for more than just paying benefits. There may be challenges to benefit awards from an estate, the data is useful for research, etc.

What happened is that Musk focused one field "Death Flag set to FALSE" and he and Trump have spun this into:

Death Flag set to FALSE means paying benefits. This is false.

Death Flag set to False != Receiving Benefits (Spoken, that logic would read "Death flag set to false DOES NOT mean receiving benefits".

A payment issued (for example December 2024 when SS Retirement payments equaled 89,106) means "receiving benefits".

There are not millions and millions of people over 100 receiving SS Retirement. Just ain't happening.

WW
Ok, but it is arguably more than most believe! I believe there are more than they know, still receiving benefits based on the number of people still on the rolls. People are greedy
 
Ok, but it is arguably more than most believe!

Not really.

DEC 2024 Payments to people over 100 for SS Retirement = 89,106.

2020 Census, Number of people over 100 in the US = 92,000.

Small variations over time and not all people even qualify for SS Retirement.

So no, there are not millions of people over 100 drawing SS Retirement benefits.

I believe there are more than they know, still receiving benefits based on the number of people still on the rolls. People are greedy

That's the thing. People DON'T just get benefits for being "still on the rolls".

People are NEVER removed from the rolls (it's a database thing). The question isn't how many people are in the system. The question is how many people over 100 are drawing benefits, becuase those are two different questions.

ANSWER: The number drawing benefits closely aligns with census data. Oh - and the census was done under the Trump Administration. It shows there are not millions over 100 drawing SS Retirement benefits.

WW
.
.
.
.
1741204390871.webp


1741204380083.webp
 
Meh..................I'll wait for Congresses report.
If it was true, you'd know it already. Elon and Trump didn't argue back when we found out their claims were bogus.

Congress isn't going to launch an investigation into Elon's findings.
 
If it was true, you'd know it already.
House Oversight is conducting an investigation. When they are done, a full report will be issued. That's how it works. They have released some findings already.

Of it doesn't agree with your cult you know you still won't believe it.
No, I'll accept the report.
 
House Oversight is conducting an investigation. When they are done, a full report will be issued. That's how it works. They have released some findings already.


No, I'll accept the report.
Trump's doing a lot of things he shouldn't be doing on his own. Things he should be going through congress to get done. Funny they aren't doing their job there but they're going to do a full investigation into this, and Fort Knox, and aliens and JFK assassination files. But not the Epstein files. Since they are basically letting the POTUS do whatever he wants. They just have to sign a few bills. And the Supreme Court will defend/protect any pork that benefits Republican peanut farmers/donors and sending money to Africa.
 
Trump's doing a lot of things he shouldn't be doing on his own. Things he should be going through congress to get done. Funny they aren't doing their job there but they're going to do a full investigation into this, and Fort Knox, and aliens and JFK assassination files. But not the Epstein files. Since they are basically letting the POTUS do whatever he wants. They just have to sign a few bills. And the Supreme Court will defend/protect any pork that benefits Republican peanut farmers/donors and sending money to Africa.
I feel your pain.
 
15th post
Trump went on at great length about the supposed scourge of the Social Security Administration wrongly paying retirement benefits to people listed in the agency’s system as well over 100 years old.

“A lot of money is paid out to people because it just keeps getting paid and paid and nobody ― it really hurts Social Security and hurts our country,” Trump said. “1.3 million people from ages 150 to 159 and over 130,000 people, according to the Social Security databases, are over 160 years old. We have a healthier country than I thought.”

The super elderly Social Security recipients myth got debunked last month

The fact that Trump still plowed ahead with the bogus story in his address to Congress and said Social Security is full of “probable fraud” could be a bad sign for the popular retirement program
Prove that the myths are debunked!
You make a claim that Trump wasn't telling the truth... well he has the facts... YOU obviously DON"T!
PLUS dummies like you think that Trump was saying that people over 160 years old were getting payments!
HE didn't say one time that SS payments were being made to people over 160 years! ZERO!
The point he is making is we don't know for sure if these people that died but the SS was not notified!
"It's difficult to know how many people die in the United States without being reported to the Social Security Administration (SSA) because the SSA doesn't track this information. However, the SSA's inspector general found that nearly 19 million people in the Numident database appeared to be over 100 years old and didn't have a recorded death.
Explanation
  • The SSA receives death reports from many sources, including funeral homes, family members, and financial institutions.

  • Deaths that aren't reported to the SSA aren't recorded in the Social Security Death Index (SSDI).

  • The SSA can't pay benefits for the month of a recipient's death.

  • The SSA argued that it wasn't worth the expense to try to clean up information about people who died before electronic records were common.
The SSDI records are released three years after a person's death. Records were initially excluded if the person was under 18 at the time of death or didn't have a Social Security number.
 
Trump's doing a lot of things he shouldn't be doing on his own. Things he should be going through congress to get done. Funny they aren't doing their job there but they're going to do a full investigation into this, and Fort Knox, and aliens and JFK assassination files. But not the Epstein files. Since they are basically letting the POTUS do whatever he wants. They just have to sign a few bills. And the Supreme Court will defend/protect any pork that benefits Republican peanut farmers/donors and sending money to Africa.
"But not the Epstein files..."THAT's a lie!
FACTS!!! NOT your truly uninformed and totally ignorant comments!

 
I was told that there is now a 7 month backlog if you apply for social security. So, yeah, Trump and the Repubs are out to destroy it.
 
I was told that there is now a 7 month backlog if you apply for social security. So, yeah, Trump and the Repubs are out to destroy it.

Don’t confuse SS Retirement and SS Disability.

It doesn’t take 7 months to start retirement benefits.

WW
 
Back
Top Bottom