Will Putin "Stop after Ukraine"?

[Rigby5]

WRONG

The US never tried to put nukes in Poland

Interceptor missiles are not nuclear.

no where does your article mention Srpint missiles

YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR

Wrong.
Interceptor missiles are almost ALWAYS nuclear, and in particular these were Sprint ABMs that are notorious for being nuclear.

But the fact the US backed down instead switched Aegis nukes, is irrelevant.
{...

Reformulated Obama administration project​

The reformulated project announced most prominently by Vice President Biden in October, 2009, would entail smaller, mobile SM-3 interceptors, to be placed by 2018. The whole of the Obama plan "envisions stationing existing SM-3 interceptors as part of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense on Aegis-equipped ships in the Mediterranean Sea and elsewhere by 2011, and on land in Central Europe by 2015, as part of a European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA). A more advanced system would be deployed by 2018, including to Poland as EPAA phase 3, and a more-advanced generation (EPAA phase 4), theoretically capable of shooting down intercontinental missiles, by 2020."[8][51]

Phase 4 was cancelled in March 2013, triggering some speculation that it was a concession promised by Obama to President Medvedev before the 2012 United States presidential election. The allegations of Russian influence over this decision were denied by the Pentagon.[52]

The Aegis land base will still be located near Redzikowo.[53][54] Aegis Ashore for Poland was scheduled to be operational by year-end 2022.[55] However, in August 2022, Vice Admiral Jon A. Hill, director for the Missile Defense Agency, announced that the site is nearing completion and will be ready in 2023. Prior to this announcement, Hill said that US Navy sailors are already living in the facilities.[56] NSF -Redzikowo is to be declared operational on Friday, 15 December 2023, according to the Prime Minister of Poland, Donald Tusk.[1]
...}

Clearly the US has always had nukes in Poland, and that is totally unacceptable.
The claim Poland need nukes to defend against Iranian missiles, is just totally absurd.

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG

Europe does not mean on Russias border

the US has not tried to bukes on Russias border sicne we withdrew obselete nukes from turkey in the sixties

Turkey belgium germany and italy are no where near the russian border

Huh?
The only thing between Turkey and Russia, is Georgia.
They are very close together.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Interceptor missiles are almost ALWAYS nuclear, and in particular these were Sprint ABMs that are notorious for being nuclear.

But the fact the US backed down instead switched Aegis nukes, is irrelevant.
{...

Reformulated Obama administration project​

The reformulated project announced most prominently by Vice President Biden in October, 2009, would entail smaller, mobile SM-3 interceptors, to be placed by 2018. The whole of the Obama plan "envisions stationing existing SM-3 interceptors as part of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense on Aegis-equipped ships in the Mediterranean Sea and elsewhere by 2011, and on land in Central Europe by 2015, as part of a European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA). A more advanced system would be deployed by 2018, including to Poland as EPAA phase 3, and a more-advanced generation (EPAA phase 4), theoretically capable of shooting down intercontinental missiles, by 2020."[8][51]

Phase 4 was cancelled in March 2013, triggering some speculation that it was a concession promised by Obama to President Medvedev before the 2012 United States presidential election. The allegations of Russian influence over this decision were denied by the Pentagon.[52]

The Aegis land base will still be located near Redzikowo.[53][54] Aegis Ashore for Poland was scheduled to be operational by year-end 2022.[55] However, in August 2022, Vice Admiral Jon A. Hill, director for the Missile Defense Agency, announced that the site is nearing completion and will be ready in 2023. Prior to this announcement, Hill said that US Navy sailors are already living in the facilities.[56] NSF -Redzikowo is to be declared operational on Friday, 15 December 2023, according to the Prime Minister of Poland, Donald Tusk.[1]
...}

Clearly the US has always had nukes in Poland, and that is totally unacceptable.
The claim Poland need nukes to defend against Iranian missiles, is just totally absurd.

WRONG.

incerceptor missiles are never nuclear and have not been since the sixties

Interceptor missiles have to turn and maneuver fast and tight to intercept incoming missiles and cannot do so with a heavy nyuckear warhead.

AEGIS miussiles are STRICTLY conventional and never nuclear,

We never tried or wished to put nukes on Russias border since the 1960s THAT IS GFACT and your claim is a proven lie

 

[Soupnazi630]

Huh?
The only thing between Turkey and Russia, is Georgia.
They are very close together.

HUH the black sea MORON

Sorry you lose

 

[Stann]

Wrong, NATO now is still the colonial imperialists, France, England, and the US, that have invaded, abused, and terrorized hundreds of countries over the last century.

NATO has NEVER "defended" anyone, and instead murdered people like in Libya.

Putin's "fears" are totally valid, which is that the US wants to put nukes in the Ukraine, on Russia's border.

Do you understand that the Kievian Rus was founded by Vikings ( Oleg was a Varangian prince ) and the state was gradually Slavicized during it's time The Capitol was Kyiv which eventually became the Ukraine ,then Russia and Belarus split off latter. The Ukraine developed before Russia did. Therefore Russia is part of the Ukraine if anything.

 

[Rambunctious]

Putin needs to stop now... and if we had a real leader he would stop now.... Diplomacy works but you have to try it... Biden never has from day one.... he has approached this as if Ukraine were a NATO nation in good standing...
Ukraine is a corrupt country just as corrupt as Russia in every way... full of oligarch gangsters... Make them both a deal they can't refuse... don't just sit back and send them our tax dollars...

 

[Stann]

I am not stating that Russia will continue to other countries when he is done with Ukraine. THAT is the claim of the Uniparty, to try to justify sending untold billions to Ukraine.

I's saying, either that will not happen, or even if does, it will involve countries that we don't care about.

Further, I'm saying that the PURPOSE of NATO is to constitute a threat that Russia will respect. And he does.

Countries that we don't care about ? NATO is not a threat it is a defensive organization that can respond to threats like Russia.

 

[Stann]

They would never fire nukes

It would mean their total destruction

Whoever starts it will also die from it.There are no winners , we all lose. Only a madman would go there , Putin is threatening to go there. He is insane.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Whoever starts it will also die from it.There are no winners , we all lose. Only a madman would go there , Putin is threatening to go there. He is insane.

That was my point

He cannot fire them on his own

 

[Stann]

That was my point

He cannot fire them on his own

Hopefully sanity will rule the day. Pray to GOD , but row for the shore.

 

[Failzero]

1/3 of his Frontline modern Military vehicles have been ( Captured ) ( Destroyed) ( Damaged ) and almost 1/2 of his conventional Ordinance has been expended ( Forcing him to get it from North Korea , Iran , Syria ...