Will a rebranded Department of War create fear amongst Americas enemies ?

Israel is going to kill all of Hamas. I am for that. You ******* Democrat terrorists are going to have to find a new dick to suck.
View attachment 1158912
I’m not D doofus. You dumb uniparty dupes think everyone is in the uniparty.

Don is a loser just like you.

PS Israel isn’t killing Hamas. They are killing women and children dumb ****!
 
Last edited:
More like a soft off OP, as we all know these impotent men can't get it up.

That's why they have to resort to tactics like renaming things to seem more "manly."

Everyone knows it.
Speaking of impotent men who can’t get it up. Does that apply to your drug addict hero and trannies you define as your heroes?
 
Sorry but Gulf of America will not stand

Trump thinks I am the President and I can change any name I don’t like

Makes him look silly and America look silly

All these Trump names will be changed back. No reason to reward silly Presidential decisions
When is it changing back, Trollwinger?
 
I was laughing thinking about what democrats would rename the DOD next time they get the WH.
Rainbow Warriors sounds more likely than Golden Warriors.
Trannies for Peace was a close 2nd.

How Trump’s Blunt-Force Diplomacy Is Pushing His Rivals Together​

Some of President Trump’s pressure tactics appear to have backfired, sending would-be allies into the embrace of China.

Dotard gonna dotard.

At the Capitol in January, India’s foreign minister was seated in the front row for President Trump’s inauguration, a sign of the deepening ties that a generation of American presidents have attempted to forge with the world’s most populous nation.

Now, just months later, Mr. Trump is publicly lamenting that India has abandoned him for the embrace of China, Washington’s strategic rival.

“Looks like we’ve lost India and Russia to deepest, darkest, China,” Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday morning, as he posted a photo of Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia with China’s leader, Xi Jinping. The three leaders met in China earlier this week.

“May they have a long and prosperous future together!” he wrote.
 
The problem is that it is based on a fallacy that when we started calling it the "Department of Defense" instead of the "Department of War", we lost some warrior ethos.

The reality was the Department of War (effectively the Army) was combined with the Navy into the new Department of Defense, because during World War II, making the Army and Navy co-equal cabinet-level departments created a lot of coordination problems.

But in Right Wing Mythology, we stopped calling it a "Department of War" and stopped winning wars, which is absurd.

The last war America won on its own was the Spanish-American War. In the World Wars, other countries did most of the heavy lifting; in Korea, we relied on Allies as well. In Vietnam, all our allies told us it was a bad idea, but we did it anyway.
We were only in Vietnam at the request of our ally, France

You’re understanding if history and facts is mind blowingly stupid…it’s no wonder you vote dembot
 
There will be more Hamas fighters at the end of the conflict than there were prior to it. Israel is Hamas' best PR firm.
Nope. Hamas will all be dead. Couldn't happen to a nicer group. Islam going to Islam, and terrorism will always exist.
 
We were only in Vietnam at the request of our ally, France

You’re understanding if history and facts is mind blowingly stupid…it’s no wonder you vote dembot
So you think the US fought in Vietnam for years, resulting in over a million deaths, at the behest of France. If that were true, do you realize how fucked that is?
 
So you think the US fought in Vietnam for years, resulting in over a million deaths, at the behest of France. If that were true, do you realize how fucked that is?
No that’s not what I said

Your reading comprehension is worse then your understanding of history
 
No that’s not what I said

Your reading comprehension is worse then your understanding of history
Explain your words….We were only in Vietnam at the request of our ally, France.
 
Explain your words….We were only in Vietnam at the request of our ally, France.
What don’t you comprehend about that? That’s why we went to begin with
 
Im positive that it gives "Pete" a hard on but is their any real value in ths move ?
This isnt an act of similar stature to renamimg the Gulf of America. I dont think it even measures up to the glorious ban on paper straws. Those days seem a long long time ago.
It sounds a bit regal to me.
Maybe donny would find it a lot cheaper to hire a Field Marshall uniform instead. Certainly a lot more fun.
At least he could get Pete a combat jacket.

Its not your War Department so its none of your business what we call it it as long as we have your back when you cry for help
 
Nope. Hamas will all be dead. Couldn't happen to a nicer group. Islam going to Islam, and terrorism will always exist.

Even Israel doesn't believe that stupidness. Unless you're willing to run a genocide the number of Hamas fighters will be more post conflict than before. It's insurgent math.
 
15th post
What don’t you comprehend about that? That’s why we went to begin with
So your point is we went to war to help France initially and this was a worthy response. I think not. What did the Founders say about constant wars abroad and entangling alliances?

Yet we decided to stay for years, causing massive death and destruction, and then left it to the communists. Dumb no?
 
Dumb reason. Obviously.
I won't debate that, but that doesn't change the history of our involvement there.

You can make the case that most of the wars we've been involved in were for a dumb reason.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom