Why would it be wrong for the U.S to re-locate illegal immigrants to Sanctuary Cities?

[Mac1958]

From a partisan tactical perspective - since that's all that matters at this point - it would have been smarter for Trump to issue individual, formal requests to all sanctuary cities, and hold each mayor to a clear "yes" or "no". Either response would provide political fodder.

'cuz all anyone cares about is political advantage at this point.
.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Well really they should go to the most unpopulated states first, like Wyoming. They perhaps can open a factory there. They need more people.

Why? Don't send them to where they're not wanted, send them to where they are so loved and adored.

 

[rightwinger]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

More like Nixon was not that sick

Trump will fail in his petty retribution. Just like he did in his petty government shutdown

 

[22lcidw]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

More like Nixon was not that sick

Trump will fail in his petty retribution. Just like he did in his petty government shutdown

Pay for it mutha phuka!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

More importantly, if some are so upset at this idea they will work REALLY hard to fix the problem and support Trumps efforts in doing so.

He is calling out the hypocrisy obviously and you can be sure those citizens living in these Sanctuary Cities will take a vastly different perspective of this and their elected leaders if they see the numbers increase.

I don't think it's a bad or unjust choice at all. Trump has to outplay and expose those who won't support the policies he was elected on. Can you imagine Hollywood fools rethinking their position when there are tents outside their mansions?

Also, when someone says "we are a nation of immigrants", it's so disingenuous. Of course you are, but they didn't enter illegally. You controlled who entered and who could be emigrate. Many legal immigrants are probably asking themselves, "why did I go through the hassle?". Some probably still in the long process who have resentment for those who enter your country illegally.

I think what Trump should do is have Ben Carson buy up homes in the same area of all these do-good Democrats and put those people there. I'm sure Piglosi would love to have one or two dozen living on her street.

 

[candycorn]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

More like Nixon was not that sick

Trump will fail in his petty retribution. Just like he did in his petty government shutdown

True.

 

[candycorn]

Is Mexico paying for the buses too?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

More like Nixon was not that sick

Trump will fail in his petty retribution. Just like he did in his petty government shutdown

Why is it retribution? Democrats have said how much we need these people here; how they are an asset to our country; how they are hard working people just trying to support their families.

Well.........if that's the way you feel, move them to your neighborhood.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?

It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.

The cities will just ship bus them to the White House.

I would send them to Mara Lago
I hear they are hiring illegal aliens

Your side can’t send them anywhere. Your side’s premise has been that illegals need to be embraced. Here is your shot. Show US how it’s done. Show US how San Francisco and other Sanctuary cities can assimilate a flood of illegalsgals witb little to no vetting.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?

It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.

/----/
“Pelosi’s office blasted the plan. ‘The extent of this administration’s cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated,’ said Pelosi spokeswoman Ashley Etienne. ‘Using human beings — including little children — as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable.'”

Isn’t that an incredibly bigoted thing to say? Why should sending more “gifts of love” to sanctuary cities perpetuate fear? Pelosi calls them gifts of love! That’s what she called illegal immigrants! How in the world could sending people she calls gifts of love perpetuate fear? Especially sending ’em to sanctuary cities, which she adamantly supports — eagerly, wholeheartedly, and all that. How in the world can sending little gifts of love “perpetuate fear and demonize” anyone?" - Rush

 

[Cellblock2429]

I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?

It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.

/----/ It was OK when Obozo did it.
June 12th, 2016: “White House…” This’d be the Obama White House. “The White House is considering a plan to relocate thousands of illegal immigrant children to the home state of U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions, causing some to question whether presidential politics is at play.” Now, here’s the difference.

Alabama’s not a sanctuary anything. I don’t even know if they have a sanctuary city in Alabama, but the state is not. Sessions, as everybody knows, is a gigantic critic of illegal immigration. So the Obama administration doing this is a middle finger to Jeff Sessions. They’re sending a bunch of people who have violated the law to Jeff Sessions’ home state, and Jeff Sessions’ home state has not asked for them. The big difference in the Trump story is that San Francisco and Seattle, all these other sanctuary cities, want the illegals." - Rush

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The cities will just ship bus them to the White House.

Oh?! Do you really think you can make that happen? Wow, imagine liberal sanctuary cities doing that, and before a presidential election to boot. Plus think of all the material for right-wing talk shows like Hannity and Limbaugh. They would have a party with that.

 

[JWBooth]

I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?

It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.

/----/
“Pelosi’s office blasted the plan. ‘The extent of this administration’s cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated,’ said Pelosi spokeswoman Ashley Etienne. ‘Using human beings — including little children — as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable.'”

Isn’t that an incredibly bigoted thing to say? Why should sending more “gifts of love” to sanctuary cities perpetuate fear? Pelosi calls them gifts of love! That’s what she called illegal immigrants! How in the world could sending people she calls gifts of love perpetuate fear? Especially sending ’em to sanctuary cities, which she adamantly supports — eagerly, wholeheartedly, and all that. How in the world can sending little gifts of love “perpetuate fear and demonize” anyone?" - Rush

Thanks, instead of Kezar, put them out on the blocks where her home, the city supervisors, and county officials live.

 

[rightwinger]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

More like Nixon was not that sick

Trump will fail in his petty retribution. Just like he did in his petty government shutdown

Why is it retribution? Democrats have said how much we need these people here; how they are an asset to our country; how they are hard working people just trying to support their families.

Well.........if that's the way you feel, move them to your neighborhood.

It is childish and petty

Typical Trump.
Just like he shut down government for a month in a childish rage, flooding indigent immigrants into blue states is petty

Haven’t seen such a tactic since Castro sent boatloads to our shores

 

[Crixus]

Well really they should go to the most unpopulated states first, like Wyoming. They perhaps can open a factory there. They need more people.

Why?

They need people.

No, not really. Wyoming is not as friendly with the welfare. The illegals would starve and then move to Colorado where they would get much more free shit, and the wealthy democrats can put them to work mowing lawns and scoring coke for their parties. Much more easy and less costly to just send them directly to Denver.

 

[Crixus]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

More like Nixon was not that sick

Trump will fail in his petty retribution. Just like he did in his petty government shutdown

Why is it retribution? Democrats have said how much we need these people here; how they are an asset to our country; how they are hard working people just trying to support their families.

Well.........if that's the way you feel, move them to your neighborhood.

It is childish and petty

Typical Trump.
Just like he shut down government for a month in a childish rage, flooding indigent immigrants into blue states is petty

Haven’t seen such a tactic since Castro sent boatloads to our shores

Typical libtard. “Let the illegals in, just don’t let them in where I live”.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

More like Nixon was not that sick

Trump will fail in his petty retribution. Just like he did in his petty government shutdown

Why is it retribution? Democrats have said how much we need these people here; how they are an asset to our country; how they are hard working people just trying to support their families.

Well.........if that's the way you feel, move them to your neighborhood.

It is childish and petty

Typical Trump.
Just like he shut down government for a month in a childish rage, flooding indigent immigrants into blue states is petty

Haven’t seen such a tactic since Castro sent boatloads to our shores

What are you talking about? Trump is trying to keep these people out, and the Democrats with their Commie activist judges are trying to bring them in. So I say Trump found a half-way point. If the left is going to bring them in for so-called compassionate reasons, send them to where the left are. It's actually pretty reasonable.

Oh, but what did you say? You don't want these people either? Why not? I thought you loved these people. I thought we couldn't get enough of them!

Well guess what Right-winger, once these people bed down in these liberal cities, it will show our people how the Democrats want to see the rest of the country............except in their gated communities of course.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Over a quarter of all Americans under 20 are of Hispanic descent. I do hope you guys keep up your xenophobic rants and brazen idiocy where it comes to Hispanics. It should pay off dividends for the Democrats and liberals in the future.

I contributing to the growth of Hispanics nd proud of it. That said, taking a stand against illegal immigration is not necessarily tied to xenophobia. Democrats and liberals should not be rejecting Trump’s latest plan. They should Embrace it out of defiance and principle.

 

[Penelope]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

Perhaps he should not of said at every rally how he is going to build a wall during his campaign, so the people came before the wall goes up. They do not know he isn't getting his wall.

He created this.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Seems like something Nixon would do

Even Nixon was not this slick. Trump just made a move to checkmate. If Democrats don't give him a problem, they will pollute their cities and states and drive them into bankruptcy. If they resist like they are doing now, it will show what hypocrites the Democrats are.

It's a win-win for Trump, so why shouldn't he do it?

More like Nixon was not that sick

Trump will fail in his petty retribution. Just like he did in his petty government shutdown

Why is it retribution? Democrats have said how much we need these people here; how they are an asset to our country; how they are hard working people just trying to support their families.

Well.........if that's the way you feel, move them to your neighborhood.

It is childish and petty

Typical Trump.
Just like he shut down government for a month in a childish rage, flooding indigent immigrants into blue states is petty

Haven’t seen such a tactic since Castro sent boatloads to our shores

/----/ Obozo threatened the same thing in 2012. Where was your fake outrage over that?