Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
The cities will just ship bus them to the White House.
I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
He did. He sent them all to Chitcago to build the Sears towerWish he had.Seems like something Nixon would do
Well really they should go to the most unpopulated states first, like Wyoming. They perhaps can open a factory there. They need more people.
Well really they should go to the most unpopulated states first, like Wyoming. They perhaps can open a factory there. They need more people.
I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
The illegals last footstep before stepping into the USA was in Mexico, send them back, violently if possible and be done with them. If they come back, 5 years at hard labor automatically, then send them back.
You ever see what Mexico does to Americans in Mexico illegally?
You ever see what Mexicans do to their own people ? The only reason Mexico even exists is so rich white politicians don’t have to fly all the way to Tailand to screw children.
SC, we can always count on you for a well thought out position and post. You are absolutely correct. Before too long we may even see that these Sanctuary cities calling out the loudest for a permanent wall to stop this chaos at the border.I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
The cities will just ship bus them to the White House.
Well really they should go to the most unpopulated states first, like Wyoming. They perhaps can open a factory there. They need more people.
Why?
Well really they should go to the most unpopulated states first, like Wyoming. They perhaps can open a factory there. They need more people.
Why?
They need people.
It odes not matter if they are Hispanic. It matter if they can compete with the East Asian people. Otherwise America will become Venezuela in a few decades.Over a quarter of all Americans under 20 are of Hispanic descent. I do hope you guys keep up your xenophobic rants and brazen idiocy where it comes to Hispanics. It should pay off dividends for the Democrats and liberals in the future.
It odes not matter if they are Hispanic. It matter if they can compete with the East Asian people. Otherwise America will become Venezuela in a few decades.Over a quarter of all Americans under 20 are of Hispanic descent. I do hope you guys keep up your xenophobic rants and brazen idiocy where it comes to Hispanics. It should pay off dividends for the Democrats and liberals in the future.
Over a quarter of all Americans under 20 are of Hispanic descent. I do hope you guys keep up your xenophobic rants and brazen idiocy where it comes to Hispanics. It should pay off dividends for the Democrats and liberals in the future.
I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
The cities will just ship bus them to the White House.
I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
The cities will just ship bus them to the White House.
What will that accomplish for the sanctuary cities? It will only further Trump’s point that the Democrats are full of shit and really don’t want the illegals. They just want their votes and any other perks they can extrapolate from them.
I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
The cities will just ship bus them to the White House.
I don't understand the counter argument. How is this political when the same politicians are welcoming such illegal immigration, giving them free stuff they don't even give Americans and refuse to fix the problem?
It's honestly mind boggling that anyone who openly supports Sanctuary Cities would be against this idea. It makes perfect sense. The places that want illegal immigration and defend them can now have an unlimited supply. Other communities that don't want lawlessness and breaching of their sovereignty will be void of it.
The cities will just ship bus them to the White House.
I would send them to Mara Lago
I hear they are hiring illegal aliens
Seems like something Nixon would do