Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some have attacked Reinhart for defending former employees of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2008, after Reinhart had worked for a decade as a federal prosecutor in West Palm Beach.
Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article264444421.html#storylink=cpy
I didn't change the subject. You're the one who accused me of not supporting the rule of law. How come you don't support the rule of law? Why do you support illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?Changing the subject. Why?
Stay stupid
Farouk has no choice in that.Stay stupid
He did. Stay stupidLOL
Slobbers the idiot who thinks this judge represented Epstein.
Depends on who you ask, Simp.
Like I said, it may have been an opinion, but certainly not a lie. That proves your source is a shit source.
You sure have lost a lot already today.
LOLOLOL
Moron, you claimed Judge Reinhart was Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer. You literally posted a link which said he was actually the lawyer for some of Epstein’s employees and one of Epstein’s sex slaves. In other words, not Epstein.
Xiden buying your dinners?LOL
He said, "the people." That's who polls represent and the polls show she wasn't so popular.
Do you even realize no matter how much you fluff him, he's still not gonna buy you dinner?
Farouk has no choice in that.
He did not represent Epstein himself but some of his employees.Stay stupid , the internet is not your friend
Judge who approved FBI’s Mar-a-Lago search represented clients linked to Jeffrey Epstein
Bruce Reinhart worked as a federal prosecutor until Jan. 1, 2008, when a day later he became a defense attorney representing employees of Epstein.www.politico.com
Did the DOJ go to court to enforce that subpoena? No...they skipped right over that step and went right to getting a warrant to raid an ex President's home! So when Garland says they HAD to do what they did...he's lying.Trump was subpoenaed to turn over classified documents. Could be they went in to retrieve them because he wasn't fully cooperating.
Meet me at the real thread for that conversation . That is not the topic of this thread.I didn't change the subject. You're the one who accused me of not supporting the rule of law. How come you don't support the rule of law? Why do you support illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
I don't read trash like Breitbart, thats true. I like to read/watch major news sources: BBC, DW, ABC, Bloomberg, CNBC, NYT, WAPO, and local news. I don't watch MSNBC, Fox, Breitbart, Mother Jones etc.ROFL
Sure you don't.
TRUMP HAD IT MONDAY.The actual warrant was printed last Friday. Oberfuhrer Garland sure the fuck didn't give it to Breitbart.
Did the DOJ go to court to enforce that subpoena? No...they skipped right over that step and went right to getting a warrant to raid an ex President's home! So when Garland says they HAD to do what they did...he's lying.
And another lie by your lying source. Now keep in mind, these are from their FRONT PAGE OF MOST EGREGIOUS LIES, not buried thousands deep.
And you know this how, Faun? Barack Obama took 30 million documents with him when he left the White House. His people are STILL going through those before they're turned over to the National Archives. Do you think there is classified materials in those 30 million documents? Do you think the FBI should conduct a raid to make sure?There's never been an ex-president holding onto classified and top secret material as Trump is purported to have done.
[ Wishing what you post to be true does not make it true ]Did the DOJ go to court to enforce that subpoena? No...they skipped right over that step and went right to getting a warrant to raid an ex President's home! So when Garland says they HAD to do what they did...he's lying.