Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it's irrelevant then why did you ask the question in the first place.This is irrelevant. Children also do not have full rights
Assuming that the declaration of rights refers only to the government, then one could assume that the 14th amendment covers implicit rights. But it's not.If it's irrelevant then why did you ask the question in the first place.
Commit a felony and see what rights you lose. Rights are conditional. You can surrender your rights.
Once again, if the 14th amendment covers implicit rights, then it is impossible to issue new laws, because any law that is passed restricts implicit rights.
Explicit rights are absolute, implicit rights can be limited at any time by the issuance of law. Therefore, the decision of the Supreme Court is out of law.
This is a common practice in any country.
And America now cannot separate itself from dictatorships, as it did during the Reagan era. Freedom in the US is also disappearing
That was even more than less than helpful.Assuming that the declaration of rights refers only to the government, then one could assume that the 14th amendment covers implicit rights. But it's not.
It was a little more than a speech.Rights are not absolute ... there's serious efforts here to throw a former President into prison for his speech ... even though the speech was political in nature ... did his speech at The Oval "imminately" cause the "lawless actions" at the Capitol? ...
It's laughable joke to think anyone would even suggest in public that Putin be arrested and throw in jail ... laughable ...
It was a little more than a speech.
Did you even watch the hearings? Dude pulled every string he could to circumvent the constitutionally required peaceful transfer of power.Well ... the rioting at the Capitol wasn't "imminate" to the President's speech ... thus it's protected ... the folks who heard the call to break down the barricades didn't have time to go and break down the barricades before the barricades were broken down ... the case fails on simple cause-and-effect ...
Once the synagogue is burnt down, the drunken Nazis can cry to burn it down all they want to ... protected speech ...