Chain Rection: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics

And blacks have a lower fertility rate than whites.
 
... not contributing to conversations in a meaningful way since 2011!

Still afraid to compare threads started, big mouth? Let's see who contributes more.
 
Last edited:
If the facts are so 'obvious', why doe no university have a Department of Race Realism or use any of your heroes works as required textbooks?
Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton enjoyed successful academic careers despite efforts by those who could not refute them to get them fired.

The answer to your question is that for reasons I do not quite understand those in charge of universities and journalism resist a candid discussion of black social pathology and the possible genetic reasons for it.

If they really believed that the assertions of race realism were false, they would welcome a candid debate of those assertions.
 
Last edited:
Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton enjoyed successful academic careers despite efforts by those who could not refute them to get them fired.
Which shows how stupid tenure is.

That guy at Northwestern who claims the Holocaust never happened still has a job, too.

 
Eventually the truth will overcome efforts to suppress it. Year after year most Negroes will continue to disappoint optimistic predictions of their potential, as they prove that Charles Murray and Professor J. Philippe Rushton were correct.

Meanwhile, Jews will become richer and more powerful because of their high IQ averages.
 
Eventually the truth will overcome efforts to suppress it. Year after year most Negroes will continue to disappoint optimistic predictions of their potential, as they prove that Charles Murray and Professor J. Philippe Rushton were correct.

Meanwhile, Jews will become richer and more powerful because of their high IQ averages.
Actually, most blacks have hit at least the middle class, guy.

59.5% of blacks are at least lower middle class.


As of the 2010 Census, black households had a median income of $32,068,[7] which placed the median black household within the second income quintile.[7] 27.3% of black households earned an income between $25,000 and $50,000, 15.2% earned between $50,000 and $75,000, 7.6% earned between $75,000 and $100,000, and 9.4% earned more than $100,000.[7]
 
Actually, most blacks have hit at least the middle class, guy.

59.5% of blacks are at least lower middle class.


As of the 2010 Census, black households had a median income of $32,068,[7] which placed the median black household within the second income quintile.[7] 27.3% of black households earned an income between $25,000 and $50,000, 15.2% earned between $50,000 and $75,000, 7.6% earned between $75,000 and $100,000, and 9.4% earned more than $100,000.[7]
How much of that has been due to affirmative action and welfare?
 
You can't have it both ways, buddy.

Either AA helps blacks hit the middle class, and it should be continued.

Or it doesn't and we should try something else.
Why should we try something else? More to the point: why should we assume something else will close the race gap in average ability levels and behavior, when every other effort has failed?

Jews have a long history of succeeding against the odds.
 
Why should we try something else? More to the point: why should we assume something else will close the race gap in average ability levels and behavior, when every other effort has failed?

Jews have a long history of succeeding against the odds.

They have a long history of wearing out their welcome wherever they go.

But since the US never made Jews slaves or had anything like Jim Crow, et. al. that's besides the point.


So let's review Cockroach circular Logic.

"Black's can't advance because they are too stupid, so we should stop doing affirmative action".

"But in the last 40 years they've closed the income gap, the employment gap, and the equality gap!"

"That's because of Affirmative Action!"

"Um, so it's doing what it's supposed to be doing. So what's your complaint again?"
 
They have a long history of wearing out their welcome wherever they go.

But since the US never made Jews slaves or had anything like Jim Crow, et. al. that's besides the point.


So let's review Cockroach circular Logic.

"Black's can't advance because they are too stupid, so we should stop doing affirmative action".

"But in the last 40 years they've closed the income gap, the employment gap, and the equality gap!"

"That's because of Affirmative Action!"

"Um, so it's doing what it's supposed to be doing. So what's your complaint again?"
Jews are welcome in the United States. They are only resented by those who cannot compete with them.

You make excuses for Negroes. You cannot explain the endurance of the race gap in average IQ, and the high black crime rate.

By lowering standards for Negroes affirmative action discriminates against whites and Orientals. That is why I want the Supreme Court to rule against it.
 
Jews are welcome in the United States. They are only resented by those who cannot compete with them.

They don't seem terribly welcome on College Campuses right now...heh, heh, heh...

You make excuses for Negroes. You cannot explain the endurance of the race gap in average IQ, and the high black crime rate.

Sure I can. 400 years of institutionalized racism. If blacks were truly inferior, whites wouldn't have to come up with so many schemes to keep them down.

By lowering standards for Negroes affirmative action discriminates against whites and Orientals. That is why I want the Supreme Court to rule against it.

And they probably will, but companies will keep striving for diversity because it's good business.
 
They don't seem terribly welcome on College Campuses right now...heh, heh, heh...



Sure I can. 400 years of institutionalized racism. If blacks were truly inferior, whites wouldn't have to come up with so many schemes to keep them down.



And they probably will, but companies will keep striving for diversity because it's good business.
They don't seem terribly welcome on College Campuses right now...heh, heh, heh...



Sure I can. 400 years of institutionalized racism. If blacks were truly inferior, whites wouldn't have to come up with so many schemes to keep them down.



And they probably will, but companies will keep striving for diversity because it's good business.
RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE 'REVISED' EDITION OF S. J. GOULD'S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN (1996) J. Philippe Rushton Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada

Gould withholds from his readers that The Bell Curve is mainly an empirical work about the causes of social stratification and that it reached its conclusions only after fully analyzing a 12-year longitudinal study of 12,486 youths (3022 of whom were African-American), which showed that most 17-year-olds with high IQs (Blacks as well as Whites) went on to occupational success by their late 20s and early 30s whereas many of those with low IQs (both Black and White) went on to welfare dependency. The average IQ for African-Americans was found to be lower than those for Latino-, White-, Asian-, and Jewish-Americans (85, 89, 103, 106, and 115, respectively, pp. 273-278). Failure to mention these data fosters the false belief that IQ tests are not predictive and are biased in favor of North Europeans.

 
Sure I can. 400 years of institutionalized racism.

During the last 400 years Negroes have been introduced to a civilization incomparably superior to anything they have been able to create on their own anywhere in earth at any time in history.

That is why American Negroes tend to be more affluent and in better health than Negroes in Africa and the Caribbean.
 
RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE 'REVISED' EDITION OF S. J. GOULD'S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN (1996) J. Philippe Rushton Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada

We can tell when Cockroach has been hit in his ideological nads when he goes to his happy place of citing his pseudo-intellectual twats.

During the last 400 years Negroes have been introduced to a civilization incomparably superior to anything they have been able to create on their own anywhere in earth at any time in history.

Oh, bullshit. White people 400 years ago were fucking savages. If I took you in a blue box and dropped your ass back in 1624, you'd be burned at the stake in a week.
 
We can tell when Cockroach has been hit in his ideological nads when he goes to his happy place of citing his pseudo-intellectual twats.



Oh, bullshit. White people 400 years ago were fucking savages. If I took you in a blue box and dropped your ass back in 1624, you'd be burned at the stake in a week.
What is psuedo about the assertions of Professor J Philippe Rushton?

Where is there evidence of genetic equality between the races in intelligence and behavior?

Four centuries ago whites were not eating each other.

Why are American Negroes on the average more affluent and in better health than Negroes in black majority, black run countries?
 
What is psuedo about the assertions of Professor J Philippe Rushton?
Everything.

His own university has denounced his writings.


Western's Department of Psychology denounced the work of former professor Philippe Rushton, known for his research attempting to link race and intelligence.

The statement, published after a department meeting on Monday, disavows Rushton’s work as “racist” and an abuse of academic freedom. The statement does not apologize for Western University’s role in supporting Rushton’s work.

“Rushton’s work is deeply flawed from a scientific standpoint,” reads the statement. “Rushton’s works on ‘race and intelligence’ are based on an incorrect assumption that fuels systemic racism.”

The statement came less than a day after Western released the findings of its Anti-Racism Working Group. The report found there to be “systemic problems embedded within the university” and included 24 recommendations to rebuild how racism is handled on campus. One of these recommendations was to “acknowledge and apologize for the harm caused by … Philippe Rushton.”
 
Everything.

His own university has denounced his writings.


Western's Department of Psychology denounced the work of former professor Philippe Rushton, known for his research attempting to link race and intelligence.

The statement, published after a department meeting on Monday, disavows Rushton’s work as “racist” and an abuse of academic freedom. The statement does not apologize for Western University’s role in supporting Rushton’s work.

“Rushton’s work is deeply flawed from a scientific standpoint,” reads the statement. “Rushton’s works on ‘race and intelligence’ are based on an incorrect assumption that fuels systemic racism.”

The statement came less than a day after Western released the findings of its Anti-Racism Working Group. The report found there to be “systemic problems embedded within the university” and included 24 recommendations to rebuild how racism is handled on campus. One of these recommendations was to “acknowledge and apologize for the harm caused by … Philippe Rushton.”
Since everything is wrong with the assertions of Professor J. Philippe Rushton, it should be possible for you to draw attention to one of his assertions and prove that it is wrong in your own words.

Professor Rushton has been denounced. He has never been disproved. He will be disproved when scientific evidence is found that the races are intrinsically comparable in non cosmetic characteristics.

The failure of every expensive effort to close race gaps in average intellectual performance is powerful evidence that Professor Rushton is correct in his assertions.

There should never be any taboos and sanctions against presenting scientific facts.

It is insufficient to assert “Rushton’s work is deeply flawed from a scientific standpoint.” It needs to be proved that Rushton's work is deeply flawed from a scientific standpoint. It never has been.

The persecution of that brave man is a shameful chapter in the intellectual history of the West.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom