Sometimes when I read certain scriptures that are warnings about deception...I think to myself: God knew in advance
exactly what would happen in the future that necessitated those very specific clear warnings.
I think the scripture you brought up is a perfect example of that.
Reportedly, the "apparition of Mary" in Fatima fit that "like an angel of light" description in the 2 Cor. 11 warning to a tee:
"The Virgin Mary appeared to the children on May 13, 1917 as “a lady dressed in white, shining brighter than the sun, giving out rays of clear and intense light,” dos Santos wrote. She promised to come to the children on the 13th of each month."
So, by their own admission, the rosary with beads custom at least partially originated from an apparition to three children in Portugal.
Here's what we have so far:
- Jesus specifically said do not pray in a repetitious / chanting type of way. (Matthew 6:7)
- God specifically said do not pray to those who have passed on. (Deuteronomy 18:11-12)
- Prayer beads have a pagan background, they have always been used by pagan and other false religions.
- The Bible clearly says that there is only one mediator between God and man; Christ Jesus. (1 Timothy 2:5)
- We are specifically warned to test the spirits, because satan himself can masquerade as an angel of light ( 1 John 4:1, 2 Corinthians 11:14)
- The "apparition of Mary" reportedly promises salvation to those who embrace it (source) which clearly goes against the scriptures.
- The Fatima "Mary" apparition promotes and honors itself, which is not what the real Mary would have done, and is yet another clear clue that it was a deception. ("I desire here a chapel in my honor to be built, that people continue to recite the Rosary every day." source)
So, when put all together, for me it is truly amazing to see what I clearly see as such a massive deception, continuing to mislead millions of well-meaning people. But more than just amazing, it is very disturbing, because so many people are so deeply invested / committed to Catholicism that they will vehemently defend this tradition, and argue away all the points I brought up, instead of looking at the history and facts in an objective way, putting
truth first, above any allegiance to a particular church or denomination.
The response to that will likely be "but it's harmless, so why does it matter to you?" Well, here's the thing. False teachings can and often
do lead to other false doctrines, so it's not entirely harmless... it has a sort of domino effect. That is why TIR is absolutely correct when she stated that on threads like this she will correct what is false, because that is one of the things the scriptures are for. (
2 Timothy 3:16) And I don't think I'm alone in not liking to see anyone misled...that is part of caring about others, not wanting to see people misled.
Thanks for reading this long post, and I hope that if anyone disagrees with it, they will clearly show
how it is wrong, and refute it using the scriptures...in a civil way. I have to give Meriweather props for that, she is usually civil, even when there is strong disagreement between her and us non-Catholic Christians.