Why replace?

[dblack]

ACA is flawed because it tries to do the wrong thing. Why should we 'replace' any of it?

 

[norwegen]

Let the people replace it as they wish.

Replacing government healthcare with government healthcare seems pointless.

 

[Pete7469]

I agree %100, in fact I think a whole lot of regulation needs to be taken out, and that the industry needs to be left alone to flourish. Tort reform and a tiered system that can affordably help the actual poor citizens who need it, a system the working class can generally afford, and the upper class shit where celebrities waste their money trying to live forever.

Rather than flush that money down the DNC toilet.

Everyone wins.

 

[JakeStarkey]

But that is what it is happening.

The US appears to not be going back to the bad old days.

 

[dblack]

But that is what it is happening.

The US appears to not be going back to the bad old days.

They plan to extend the bad old days in perpetuity. They're going to change the names, to buy some political cover, but continue with the corporate collusion that created ACA