Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

At Trump’s direction. Remember Warp Speed?
That is correct.that was the incentive for a record low time to create the "vaccines".

Do you have a handy conspiracy theory you want to promote?.
 
You already admitted there isn't. Keep your story straight, moron.

No challenges means no precedent. Come back to me when you have a case.
No stupid. There hasn't been any challenges on these blanket pardons for people never charged with a crime.

The SC ruling set a precedent, moron. It said pardons are for those charged and convicted of crimes against the United States.

Seriously, you should tap out. You look dumber with every post............and you started out as a complet idiot.
 
You provide the link. The assertion was made, not by me, that Fauci could commit murder under this pardon.
I made no such claim. YOU claimed we "lionize murderers". Bring a link, or admit you are a lying sack of vermin shit.

GO!
 
The SC ruling set a precedent, moron. It said pardons are for those charged and convicted of crimes against the United States.
It doesn't. You're badly misinterpreting whatever you think you're reading.


Can the President pardon someone before they are indicted, convicted, or sentenced for a federal offense against the United States?

It would be highly unusual, but there have been a few cases where people who had not been charged with a crime were pardoned, including President Gerald Ford's pardon of President Richard Nixon after Watergate, President Jimmy Carter's pardon of Vietnam draft dodgers and President George H.W. Bush's pardon of Caspar Weinberger. President Donald J. Trump pardoned Joseph Arpaio and others after they were charged and convicted, but prior to sentencing.
 
I made no such claim. YOU claimed we "lionize murderers". Bring a link, or admit you are a lying sack of vermin shit.

GO!
Let them all out, didn’t he? :dunno:
That is correct.that was the incentive for a record low time to create the "vaccines".

Do you have a handy conspiracy theory you want to promote?.
I don’t know what that means. I see the situation as MAGA being against the vaccines, while having cognitive dissonance over the fact that Trump is the reason we got them so quick! :biggrin:
 
It doesn't. You're badly misinterpreting whatever you think you're reading.


Can the President pardon someone before they are indicted, convicted, or sentenced for a federal offense against the United States?

It would be highly unusual, but there have been a few cases where people who had not been charged with a crime were pardoned, including President Gerald Ford's pardon of President Richard Nixon after Watergate, President Jimmy Carter's pardon of Vietnam draft dodgers and President George H.W. Bush's pardon of Caspar Weinberger. President Donald J. Trump pardoned Joseph Arpaio and others after they were charged and convicted, but prior to sentencing.
Which of those cases was challenged in court and ruled on by the SC. Ya know, the SC that has already said pardons are for those charged and convicted?

You really should just tap out, dumbass. You look dumber with every post. You are now going around in circles reposted the same dumbassery you have been destroyed on already in this thread.
 
Which of those cases was challenged in court and ruled on by the SC. Ya know, the SC that has already said pardons are for those charged and convicted?

You really should just tap out, dumbass. You look dumber with every post. You are now going around in circles reposted the same dumbassery you have been destroyed on already in this thread.
SCOTUS also said POTUS can do whatever he wants.
 
Ya know, the SC that has already said pardons are for those charged and convicted?
The DoJ Office of Pardon's say otherwise. Are you telling me you've figured this out on your own and the attorneys who manage pardons for the president are wrong?
 
The DoJ Office of Pardon's say otherwise. Are you telling me you've figured this out on your own and the attorneys who manage pardons for the president are wrong?
I don't give a rip what the corrupt DOJ says. The SC ruling is clear, Dumbass.

Keep looking dumber, it's what you do best.

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 
I don't give a rip what the corrupt DOJ says. The SC ruling is clear, Dumbass.

Keep looking dumber, it's what you do best.

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
Oh, okay. You're smarter than actual attorneys at the DoJ. You're the smartest little boy in the whole world.
 
Oh, okay. You're smarter than actual attorneys at the DoJ. You're the smartest little boy in the whole world.
No stupid, the SC is smarter than the hacks at the DOJ.

Got it now?
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom