Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 74,857
- 65,620
- 3,615
The ruling I'm referencing has already been made, you blithering nincompoop.Think you got a couple of waverers on that court!![]()




Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ruling I'm referencing has already been made, you blithering nincompoop.Think you got a couple of waverers on that court!![]()
You’re not the Supreme Court, dipshit. You have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re just a lonely internet troll.No stupid, the SC is smarter than the hacks at the DOJ.
Got it now?
Link to me claiming I am the Supreme Court?You’re not the Supreme Court, dipshit. You have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re just a lonely internet troll.
You have no idea what you’re talking about and misinterpreting an unrelated case.Link to me claiming I am the Supreme Court?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I accept your concession, Troll.You have no idea what you’re talking about and misinterpreting an unrelated case.
You’re a dope.
Still thinking you know more about pardons than the DoJ’s office of pardons? You’re a dope.I accept your concession, Troll.
Obviously erroneously!The ruling I'm referencing has already been made, you blithering nincompoop
Four of the justices are irretrievably compromised and corrupt. Impeach Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.No stupid, the SC is smarter than the hacks at the DOJ.
Got it now?
I am quite sure no one ever even though that it was possible to pre pardon someone it is an absolute admission of guiltYes. There is no requirement. Where do you see one?
How do you know it's legal no one has ever had the brass cajhones to trey this garbage beforeWhere did I say it was OK? I said it is legal. You just don't get the big picture.
I have no idea what you are trying to say. Perhaps some punctuation and grammar might help me through that disaster of a sentence fragment.I am quite sure no one ever even though that it was possible to pre pardon someone it is an absolute admission of guilt
I haven't "trey"ed anything. Nor do I have cajónes.How do you know it's legal no one has ever had the brass cajhones to trey this garbage before
PSYCHE!I am quite sure no one ever even though that it was possible to pre pardon someone it is an absolute admission of guilt
as other lib posters have said, pardons are absolute, so yes my theoretical would be covered. and for the record, which cop killers are "lionized" by conservatives? then ask the same question about liberals.I’m sure it doesn’t cover murder, not that that bothers MAGA. They lionize copkillers!
What's funny is that Trump will probably get to appoint one or two more SC justices, did you see how Sotomayor looked last Monday? and Thomas may retire in the next 4 years. so cry me a river, libs, you lost and keep losing while the country keeps winning.Four of the justices are irretrievably compromised and corrupt. Impeach Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.
She just needs to hang on until after the ‘26 election, when the the Dems should have impeachment/ removal numbers.What's funny is that Trump will probably get to appoint one or two more SC justices, did you see how Sotomayor looked last Monday? and Thomas may retire in the next 4 years. so cry me a river, libs, you lost and keep losing while the country keeps winning.
We have already been over this, Simp.Still thinking you know more about pardons than the DoJ’s office of pardons? You’re a dope.
Cry more, loser.Four of the justices are irretrievably compromised and corrupt. Impeach Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.
We didn’t go over it. You just replied “nuh uh” and pretend like you speak for the Supreme Court.We have already been over this, Simp
We have already been over this, Simp.We didn’t go over it. You just replied “nuh uh” and pretend like you speak for the Supreme Court.
You’re a moron who thinks you’re smarter than people who actually know what they’re talking about.