Why jews were sometimes discriminated in europe?

It is not against the law to discriminate in the United States ... how can you believe that? ... there's only a handful of protected classes for government and business ... individuals in their private affairs can, and do, discriminate based on skin color, religion, ethnicity and well you know the rest ... "birds of a feather flock together" ...

To be clear ... I stated that the Dutch do not get discriminated against ... I didn't say the Dutch don't discriminate ... as a man of Dutch decent here in the United States, I've been granted all society's privilege in abundance ... I have to travel 1,000 miles to be hated on for having long long hair ...

I grew up in San Francisco ... manorahs were as common as nativities when such things were legal in public schools ...

As I have demonstrated.......even the Dutch have a history of being a victim of discrimination, especially the Jews during the War when Germany invaded the Netherlands.

Its not illegal to discriminate in the United States? Do not confuse Free Speech with discrimination......and long hair? Who gives a rat's ass about hair.....except you? Even speech you do not agree with is allowed in a free state, and its not discrimination. When you have no free speech, you have no freedom, you are living in a social state of fascism. Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.

There are no Bill of Rights? 1st Amendment rights, 10th Amendment rights 14th Amendment rights, Civil Rights Acts........Really? 1. Deceit (semantics? really?) The German's have never historically discriminated against any Dutch Citizen such as the JEWS? 2. Deflection....really?

And FYI: The Netherlands are not a socialists...........their economy is based upon a Free Market System. How's that for deflection? At least its TRUTH not BS.



Just how ignorant and gullible are you? The ignorant never accept any amount of evidence.
 
Last edited:
It is not against the law to discriminate in the United States ... how can you believe that? ... there's only a handful of protected classes for government and business ... individuals in their private affairs can, and do, discriminate based on skin color, religion, ethnicity and well you know the rest ... "birds of a feather flock together" ...

To be clear ... I stated that the Dutch do not get discriminated against ... I didn't say the Dutch don't discriminate ... as a man of Dutch decent here in the United States, I've been granted all society's privilege in abundance ... I have to travel 1,000 miles to be hated on for having long long hair ...

I grew up in San Francisco ... manorahs were as common as nativities when such things were legal in public schools ...
My name is Dutch but everyone thinks it's German. :biggrin:
 
God cursed the Jews. That's why they are persecuted to this day. God also cursed the descendants of Canaan. That's why they are discriminated against to this day. And only God can change either.
 

Something else he learned in his " church" which was a lie. They had to explain their HATE and Antisemitism



They persecuted and killed Christians, yet making up approx 2/10 of 1 percent of the population?
Anti-Semitism of the "Church Fathers" Just ONE example
Yet he objects at what the Rabbi said???? LOL!!!!!!

Yes, you Master Race bigots have all kinds of myths you like to peddle; too bad your own historians won't play along, and neither will even most educated Jews.
 
Why did you quote me and then post no response? lol must have posted something even you knew was stupid and decided to edit it?.
 
God cursed the Jews. That's why they are persecuted to this day. God also cursed the descendants of Canaan. That's why they are discriminated against to this day. And only God can change either.

Chrisitans are more 'Jewish' than most Jews. The so-called 'Orthodox' and 'Ultra-Orthodox' aren't practicing the Hebrew religion of Moses, they're post-exilic racial cultists built on the '2nd Temple' scam created by the Babylonian Jews set up in Jerusalem by Cyrus and Ezra. 'Rabbinical Judaism' is a 2nd Century A.D. fabrication invented by the remaining Pharisees after the failed Bar Kokba Revolt, in a conclave at Jamnia around 130 A.D. or so. The Christian sect is built on a return to the pre-exilic Mosaic religion before the Babylonian Conquest, using only the written Torah and rejecting the legalisms and convoluted nonsense of the Talmuds and Mishnahs and the 'racial purity' rubbish started by Ezra.
 
Bullseye! And long before Christ.

The returnees from Babylon alienated and disenfranchised most Jews, those who weren't carried off to Babylon, and thus cut their own throats for the rest of history. The Christian sect revived the universalism implicit in the monotheism of the Mosaic tradition. And as we see today, it is far more successful as a cultural revolution, which of course why most of the Orthodox hate it with such fervor. Makes them look bad to have to have a bunch of goy keeping them alive. lol
 
Chrisitans are more 'Jewish' than most Jews. The so-called 'Orthodox' and 'Ultra-Orthodox' aren't practicing the Hebrew religion of Moses, they're post-exilic racial cultists built on the '2nd Temple' scam created by the Babylonian Jews set up in Jerusalem by Cyrus and Ezra. 'Rabbinical Judaism' is a 2nd Century A.D. fabrication invented by the remaining Pharisees after the failed Bar Kokba Revolt, in a conclave at Jamnia around 130 A.D. or so. The Christian sect is built on a return to the pre-exilic Mosaic religion before the Babylonian Conquest, using only the written Torah and rejecting the legalisms and convoluted nonsense of the Talmuds and Mishnahs and the 'racial purity' rubbish started by Ezra.
That would make them Karaites. The written Torah is not enough. In the written Torah for example, we are told to slaughter animals "as I have shown you". That method is recorded in the Oral Torah.

And nobody is practicing the religion like Moses did. we no longer have a Temple and are not about to go back to animal sacrifices. Our religion evolved with the times and circumstances. That's why we did not go extnct after the 2nd Temple was destroyed.
 
The written Torah is not enough. In the written Torah

Moses states it was complete as written. I actually admire a lot of the logic and literature in some of the Talmud, I just don't credit it with any religious significance and certainly not canon of any kind, more of a historical curiosity. It has too much crazy nonsense and bizarre exegeses in it to be taken seriously as an inspired scholarly work.

That's why we did not go extnct after the 2nd Temple was destroyed.

Well, your religion and culture went largely extinct with the first 'kings' and the first Temple; the Babylonians started a whole new cult on their return. They just kept the name 'Judaism' and a few of the slogans and names of prophets for window dressing.
 
Last edited:
That would make them Karaites. The written Torah is not enough. In the written Torah for example, we are told to slaughter animals "as I have shown you". That method is recorded in the Oral Torah.

And nobody is practicing the religion like Moses did. we no longer have a Temple and are not about to go back to animal sacrifices. Our religion evolved with the times and circumstances. That's why we did not go extnct after the 2nd Temple was destroyed.
How does one have a burger unless one slaughters it?
Over 90% of the animals slaughtered in The Temple were eaten by the visitors.
 
Moses states it was complete as written. I actually admire a lot of the logic and literature in some of the Talmud, I just don't credit it with any religious significance and certainly not canon of any kind, more of a historical curiosity. It has too much crazy nonsense and bizarre exegeses in it to be taken seriously as an inspired scholarly work.



Well, your religion and culture went largely extinct with the first 'kings' and the first Temple; the Babylonians started a whole new cult on their return. They just kept the name 'Judaism' and a few of the slogans and names of prophets for window dressing.
Where is this statement that the Torah is complete?
Moses himself had to ask God on at least 3 occasions to explain the law regarding various situations.
 
Where is this statement that the Torah is complete?
Moses himself had to ask God on at least 3 occasions to explain the law regarding various situations.
Asking for a clarification of what was already written isn't a admission of being 'incomplete' for one, and nowhere does Moses imply there was some 'double secret special oral Super Torah just for Jews' being whispered in his ear; Exodus and Deuteronomy has many verses proving it was written down completely. The 'Oral Torah' was a much later fabricated 'tradition'.
 
Asking for a clarification of what was already written isn't a admission of being 'incomplete' for one, and nowhere does Moses imply there was some 'double secret special oral Super Torah just for Jews' being whispered in his ear; Exodus and Deuteronomy has many verses proving it was written down completely. The 'Oral Torah' was a much later fabricated 'tradition'.
According to you. According to us and our tradition, Moses was given both the Written and Oral Torah at Sinai.
 
Asking for a clarification of what was already written isn't a admission of being 'incomplete' for one, and nowhere does Moses imply there was some 'double secret special oral Super Torah just for Jews' being whispered in his ear; Exodus and Deuteronomy has many verses proving it was written down completely. The 'Oral Torah' was a much later fabricated 'tradition'.
Moses had the ability to "read between the lines" almost 100% of the time.
It proves Moses was human.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top