Oh?Pre-emptive pardons can be challenged but will go nowhere.
Johnny's a seasoned jurist now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh?Pre-emptive pardons can be challenged but will go nowhere.
You just cramped Trump's signature hand: 1300 plus pardons. I am fine with that.The President can pardon anyone he choose to pardon. It is one absolute authority he has. If he is responsible and ethical, he only pardons or commutes sentences of those who deserve that mercy. And preemptive pardons are just as legal as any other pardons. Consider Gerald Ford pre-emptively pardoning Nixon so that he could not be impeached. Unpopular with the people yes and most likely cost Ford his election but completely legal.
What is not illegal are Biden's staffers pardoning people using autopen when he knew nothing about those pardons. But also extremely difficult to prove that he didn't know. Congress needs to pass a paw making it mandatory that the President personally sign any such presidential actions to prevent that kind of behavior in the future.
You must have forgotten that Joe Biden gave Liz Cheney a blanket pardon. Bondi can do absolutely nothing no matter what Cheney did up to the date of that pardon. Now if the courts rule those pardons void because they were granted via autopen and Biden knew nothing about them, then the situation might change. But since it is pretty much impossible to know what a man with advanced dementia knew at the time those pardons were granted, I wouldn't hold my breath that we will ever see justice in that case.
Are "Preemptive Pardons" even legal? The USSC needs to clarify.
All the President would need to do to use the autopen for that would to have a video made of him ordering each pardon.You just cramped Trump's signature hand: 1300 plus pardons. I am fine with that.
No more that trump has dementia. That is a stupid statement.but fly with it, little bird.If he had dementia then the pardons aren't valid, just like Trump said.
Doesn’t have to be proven. Just has to be rational.Both your statements are unproven..........lies.
They were right about you.
Even if true which is questionable, non sequitur and irrelevant to the thread topic and my argument. Try to focus okay?Trump is now using the auto pen to avoid admitting that he ordered a roundup of Venezuelans and sent them to a concentration camp in El Salvador without warrant, arraignment, evidence or due process in an attempt to solidify his imperial powers to rule by decree.
You can retire thst “autopen” trope noe.
Trump is trying to hide behind it now.
Leaves you out of the equation.Doesn’t have to be proven. Just has to be rational.
... and then certify the video. OK.All the President would need to do to use the autopen for that would to have a video made of him ordering each pardon.
I don’t actually matter. Is Trump rational?Leaves you out of the equation.
They were right about you.
I think a memo would suffice.All the President would need to do to use the autopen for that would to have a video made of him ordering each pardon.
Why does He have to prove Himself?... and then certify the video. OK.
Why did El Salvador have concentration camps?Trump is now using the auto pen to avoid admitting that he ordered a roundup of Venezuelans and sent them to a concentration camp in El Salvador without warrant, arraignment, evidence or due process in an attempt to solidify his imperial powers to rule by decree.
You can retire thst “autopen” trope noe.
Trump is trying to hide behind it now.
Unfortunately we just 'retired' a President so corrupt that it makes safeguards necessary for all present and future presidencies, not only to protect the country but to protect the Presidency.I think a memo would suffice.
Why does He have to prove Himself?
Hey Pam Bondi, the case against Liz Cheney/J6 Committee is solid. Liz told Cassidy Hutchinson to perjure herself and say Agent Ornato said Trump grabbed for the steering wheel. It was a lie. We have the texts, call Ornato. You are foot dragging & covering up for Liz Cheney. Why?
New Texts Reveal Liz Cheney Communicated with Cassidy Hutchinson About Her Select Committee Testimony—without Hutchinson’s Attorney’s Knowledge—Despite Cheney Knowing it was Unethical
![]()
House GOP report debunks ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony on ex-prez trying to wrangle SUV to Jan. 6 panel
A Republican-led House committee on Monday released a report debunking claims by ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson that the former president attempted to commandeer a Secret Service SUV on Jan. 6, 2…nypost.com
Beyond that, a nod of the head to the authorized person using the AP would suffice.................and Trump could say I didn't sign it............Unfortunately we just 'retired' a President so corrupt that it makes safeguards necessary for all present and future presidencies, not only to protect the country but to protect the Presidency.
But you're right. Each pardon does not have to be issued separately. just make a list making it unmistakable of who is being pardoned and then the President needs only sign the one document.
I wonder how Jimmy Carter handled it when he pardoned over 100,000 involved with the Vietnam war to close that chapter once and for all?
The answer is the inherent stupidity in the question.Why is it OK for democrats to incessantly prosecute phantom charges against non-democrats but Americans can’t seem to prosecute actual crimes done by democrats?
Even if true which is questionable, non sequitur and irrelevant to the thread topic and my argument. Try to focus okay?
I call it non sequitur and irrelevant when it is. And your post was.What is it with you Trumpsters? You bring something up, and then when someone responds, you call it a non sequiter and irrelvant.
But you're the one who brought it up. (you're not the only Trumpster who does this)