How the Trump Administration Rushed to Judgment in Minneapolis Shooting - The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act.

[Stann]

You quoted no statute. You gave no explanation of how you believe Trump is personally violating any statute, or law.

All you did was repackage your initial absurd claim, and expect everyone to bob their heads up and down, mindlessly in agreement...

Look, if you want to make a claim Stann, cite the statute, and explain how exactly you think that Trump is in violation of this claim....

You are crazy.

 

[j-mac]

You are crazy.

Ok then, you clearly don't want to back up your claim, shocking, I know...So, you are dismisssed.

 

[Stann]

Ok then, you clearly don't want to back up your claim, shocking, I know...So, you are dismisssed.

I gave you at least 4 statutes he is violating. You deny they exist. I deny trump's use of the Insurrection Act ( how ironic ) as misuse of the law. So there's a 5th. One he's violating.

 

[Stann]

Ok then, you clearly don't want to back up your claim, shocking, I know...So, you are dismisssed.

I did that right off the bat you idiot.

 

[Hollie]

Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.

Another thread of conspiracy theory cutting and pasting.

 

[Hollie]

Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.

You don’t realize that cutting and pasting an opinion piece from a leftist tabloid and insisting it is “phactual” is laughable.

 

[Dante]

Another thread of conspiracy theory cutting and pasting.

Ignore facts all you want. We all how dumb and ignorant you love being.

from OP:
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?

 

[Hollie]

Ignore facts all you want. We all how dumb and ignorant you love being.

from OP:
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?

“irrefutable phacts”.

Opinion pieces cut and pasted from leftist tabloids are now what leftist FAGATs call “phacts”

 

[Leo123]

Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.

Sorry, the NYT is bo longer credible. Screw their paywall too. Who would pay for that trash?

 

[Dante]

“irrefutable phacts”.

Opinion pieces cut and pasted from leftist tabloids are now what leftist FAGATs call “phacts”

Go away racist troll


go crawl back under your rock



and your Homophobic shit is far too funny. You need a Good Bull Dike to "straighten" you out

 

[Dante]

Sorry, the NYT is bo longer credible. Screw their paywall too. Who would pay for that trash?

Parading around your Denial is so...

pathetic

 

[Hollie]

Go away racist troll


go crawl back under your rock



and your Homophobic shit is far too funny. You need a Good Bull Dike to "straighten" you out

You are quite the creepy stalker.

 

[Leo123]

Parading around your Denial is so...

pathetic

I always deny lies.

 

[Dante]

I always deny lies.

IRONY ALERT!!!

 

[Leo123]

IRONY ALERT!!!

IRONY ALERT!!!

How so? The NYT tells lies. I deny their lies you swallow them like mother's milk.

 

[Dante]

How so? The NYT tells lies. I deny their lies you swallow them like mother's milk.

If that were true, they'd be in court every day -- like Trump

 

[Hollie]

Ignore facts all you want. We all how dumb and ignorant you love being.

from OP:
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?

You are desperate to ignore your cut and paste is an opinion piece. That disclaimer is in the heading of your cut and paste.

 

[Leo123]

If that were true, they'd be in court every day -- like Trump

Trump is not in court every day.

 

[Dante]

Trump is not in court every day.

Please!

What have you against Trump-style Truthful Hyperbole?


Look up "Figurative language" and then DO NOT POST HERE AGAIN until you get your head straightened out

O'Tay?

 

[Hollie]

Please!

What have you against Trump-style Truthful Hyperbole?


Look up "Figurative language" and then DO NOT POST HERE AGAIN until you get your head straightened out

O'Tay?

Was Trump in court today?