Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

[Faun]

Hey, Bruce_T_Laney, has Trump done something wrong re:Ukraine?

Was he impeached for that?

No, he was Impeached for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress!

You have to prove the favor was to investigate Joe Biden and as of now it is just others opinion they thought that is what he wanted but he never said clearly it was.

Rudy need to testify under oath!

You honestly don't think that evidence was provided that proves Trump's intent was to hold aide and a meeting until an announcement of investigations into Biden was made?

Honestly?

Do you care joe Biden did!? Then we don’t care trump did move on

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

argument is necessary.

Haha, maybe to a guy like you. But, in an actual defense at trial, or when supporting claims in crowds of educated adults, simply screaming the claim over and over doesn't cut it.

Fiddling with the quotes, eh?

Actually "No argument is necessary."

 

[Jitss617]

Was he impeached for that?

No, he was Impeached for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress!

You have to prove the favor was to investigate Joe Biden and as of now it is just others opinion they thought that is what he wanted but he never said clearly it was.

Rudy need to testify under oath!

You honestly don't think that evidence was provided that proves Trump's intent was to hold aide and a meeting until an announcement of investigations into Biden was made?

Honestly?

Do you care joe Biden did!? Then we don’t care trump did move on

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

did his son Get prosecuted?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Why does the Defendant have to provide the evidence of his or her innocence?

He doesn't. But if he had it, he should and would, don't you think?

So your argument is that all defendant's need to prove their innocence or they are to be presumed guilty? That goes counter to our ENTIRE legal system!

Interesting what you on the left are now willing to flush down the toilet in your jihad against Donald Trump, Fort!

Joe Biden is guilty tho right?? of something....

Skip the investigation, evidence, witnesses....just convict him....

When do you think Bill Barr will get around to it?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

You honestly don't think that evidence was provided that proves Trump's intent was to hold aide and a meeting until an announcement of investigations into Biden was made?

Honestly?

Do you care joe Biden did!? Then we don’t care trump did move on

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

did his son Get prosecuted?

Nope.....

I heard Bill Barr has access to prosecutors and stuff....maybe you can get with him....if you have some evidence too, that would be cool...

 

[Jitss617]

Do you care joe Biden did!? Then we don’t care trump did move on

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

did his son Get prosecuted?

Nope.....

I heard Bill Barr has access to prosecutors and stuff....maybe you can get with him....if you have some evidence too, that would be cool...

So joe didn’t gain anything? His son didn’t get investigated that’s not a gain?? Ummmm what

 

[Faun]

You honestly don't think that evidence was provided that proves Trump's intent was to hold aide and a meeting until an announcement of investigations into Biden was made?

Honestly?

Do you care joe Biden did!? Then we don’t care trump did move on

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

did his son Get prosecuted?

For what? He was never investigated.

 

[Jitss617]

Do you care joe Biden did!? Then we don’t care trump did move on

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

did his son Get prosecuted?

For what? He was never investigated.

Mic drop hehe

 

[bodecea]

The House needs to present a complete and valid case. They are the prosecutors. The Senate is the jury. A jury does not investigate.

The jury foreman doesn't brag about working closely with the defendant either.

 

[Faun]

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

did his son Get prosecuted?

Nope.....

I heard Bill Barr has access to prosecutors and stuff....maybe you can get with him....if you have some evidence too, that would be cool...

So joe didn’t gain anything? His son didn’t get investigated that’s not a gain?? Ummmm what

Neither one gained anything.

 

[Faun]

LOL

Sure, move on. And take Impeached Trump with ya.

Will you charge Biden with bribery?

Not until you can prove he gained personally by getting Shokin fired.

did his son Get prosecuted?

For what? He was never investigated.

Mic drop hehe

Thanks for admitting you have no clue. Next time though, try not dropping the Mike on your own head.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The House needs to present a complete and valid case. They are the prosecutors. The Senate is the jury. A jury does not investigate.

The jury foreman doesn't brag about working closely with the defendant either.

There currently is no defendant. There is no trial. There is no jury. There is no impeachment.

There is only a Democrat roadshow, which may or may not appear at the Senate.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It falls under Obstruction of Justice,

Neat! What it also does is delineate obstruction of congress as a crime. Give it up dude, you're embarrassing yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So your argument is that all defendant's need to prove their innocence or they are to be presumed guilty?

No. Goddamn people, read more slowly, or something.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fiddling with the quotes, eh?

No, the highlighted part jumps around for me sometimes. Not intentional. I menat to quote what you quoted. As I think would seem obvious from my comments regarding it.

 

[Meister]

It falls under Obstruction of Justice,

Neat! What it also does is delineate obstruction of congress as a crime. Give it up dude, you're embarrassing yourself.

Get a law degree. They were deliberate with the wording for a reason.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It falls under Obstruction of Justice,

Neat! What it also does is delineate obstruction of congress as a crime. Give it up dude, you're embarrassing yourself.

Get a law degree. They were deliberate with the wording for a reason.

That makes no sense whatsoever. All you have done is just whine that obstruction of congress is one variant of obstruction of justice. Which does not support your, by now, completely failed point that there is no law against obstruction of Congress. I obliterated that point with a minimum of effort.

 

[airplanemechanic]

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

In America you can’t accuse someone of murder with no evidence,, this is why America things democrats are nazis ,, you are accusing a man with no evidence of wrong doing.. your sick

First of all...this is a political trial, not a criminal...

But furthermore, if there are 7 or 8 witnesses, including 2 or 3 personal admissions to that murder -- that will bring a grand jury indictment....

Now there have been cases where a person was convicted based on either no evidence or made up evidence by police or prosecutors....but Trumpers like yourself still call them guilty ...

Do you know how those who have been falsely convicted of something get released?? Evidence.....

View attachment 295720

Like you said....."this is a political trial, not a criminal"
Then you use a criminal trial as your reference?
priceless

I use criminal trial as a reference because you dic suckers keep whining about due process, facing accusers, blah blah...all shit relative to criminal trials...

So if that is truly important to you, stand on it....call witnesses that you feel will "OWN THE LIBS" or shut the **** up

Why are you so focused on male oral sex? You and boot-edge-edge got a little something going on under the table we don't know about?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Fiddling with the quotes, eh?

No, the highlighted part jumps around for me sometimes. Not intentional. I menat to quote what you quoted. As I think would seem obvious from my comments regarding it.

I take nothing for granted with you people.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Why is Pelosi so afraid of sending the articles of impeachment to the senate?

She isn't, and she is going to do so.

Thanks for the dumb question, though. If you want to see "fear", see the obstructionist child president.

If shes not afraid why is she sitting on them? She rushed through the impeachment and then held the articles? WTF? I thought it was so important to get him the **** out ASAP?