GOP senators losing confidence in Hegseth amid Pentagon turmoil

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
82,492
Reaction score
46,450
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
ā€˜A growing group of Senate Republicans are losing confidence in Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s leadership of the Defense Department, and some GOP lawmakers would like to see him ā€œmove on,ā€ though they say it’s President Trump’s call. Senate Republicans who spoke to The Hill on the condition of anonymity say Hegseth wouldn’t be confirmed to head the Pentagon if he were renominated by Trump today, and they say senior staff turmoil at the Defense Department under Hegseth’s leadership is a major concern.

Republican defense hawks in the Senate aren’t happy about media reports that Hegseth pushed popular Army chief of staff Randy George to resign in early April, and they were surprised and disappointed to hear that Hegseth fired Navy Secretary John Phelan this past week.

One Republican senator who requested anonymity said there have long been questions within the Senate GOP conference over Hegseth’s lack of experience managing a large and complex bureaucracy, as well as leeriness about his unconventional and often brash leadership style.

The lawmaker, however, said confidence in Hegseth has dropped among Republicans because of his battles with senior military leaders who have strong relations with policymakers on Capitol Hill.'


That Senate Republicans had confidence in Hegseth to begin with is damning.

And most – if not all – of these Republicans losing confidence voted to confirm Hegseth.

Republicans are incapable of sound, responsible governance.
 
What in the hell ever gave them one iota of confidence in Whiskey Pete Hegseth in the first place? There was absolutely nothing in his rƩsumƩ that indicated he was qualified for the job and there was nothing that lent itself to instilling confidence in the man.
 
ā€˜A growing group of Senate Republicans are losing confidence in Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s leadership of the Defense Department, and some GOP lawmakers would like to see him ā€œmove on,ā€ though they say it’s President Trump’s call. Senate Republicans who spoke to The Hill on the condition of anonymity say Hegseth wouldn’t be confirmed to head the Pentagon if he were renominated by Trump today, and they say senior staff turmoil at the Defense Department under Hegseth’s leadership is a major concern.

Republican defense hawks in the Senate aren’t happy about media reports that Hegseth pushed popular Army chief of staff Randy George to resign in early April, and they were surprised and disappointed to hear that Hegseth fired Navy Secretary John Phelan this past week.

One Republican senator who requested anonymity said there have long been questions within the Senate GOP conference over Hegseth’s lack of experience managing a large and complex bureaucracy, as well as leeriness about his unconventional and often brash leadership style.

The lawmaker, however, said confidence in Hegseth has dropped among Republicans because of his battles with senior military leaders who have strong relations with policymakers on Capitol Hill.'


That Senate Republicans had confidence in Hegseth to begin with is damning.

And most – if not all – of these Republicans losing confidence voted to confirm Hegseth.

Republicans are incapable of sound, responsible governance.
as soon as i saw "anonymity" in the OP I stopped reading ..
 
Last edited:
you might not like the guy but i bet he has more military experience than anyone in this thread...


Harry, if anyone of us were filling the position of Secretary of Defense or lobbying for the job, that would be a fantastic point, seriously.
 
Hegseth is supposed to be advising our President on war matters
He is not doing a very good job

Did he advise the President that Iran would close down the strait and there is nothing he can do about it
Just to give Hegseth ten minutes in a room with Kimmell, Colbert and others to beat the shit out of them would be worth him being Defense Secretary. And then do it again.
 
ā€˜A growing group of Senate Republicans are losing confidence in Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s leadership of the Defense Department, and some GOP lawmakers would like to see him ā€œmove on,ā€ though they say it’s President Trump’s call. Senate Republicans who spoke to The Hill on the condition of anonymity say Hegseth wouldn’t be confirmed to head the Pentagon if he were renominated by Trump today, and they say senior staff turmoil at the Defense Department under Hegseth’s leadership is a major concern.

Republican defense hawks in the Senate aren’t happy about media reports that Hegseth pushed popular Army chief of staff Randy George to resign in early April, and they were surprised and disappointed to hear that Hegseth fired Navy Secretary John Phelan this past week.

One Republican senator who requested anonymity said there have long been questions within the Senate GOP conference over Hegseth’s lack of experience managing a large and complex bureaucracy, as well as leeriness about his unconventional and often brash leadership style.

The lawmaker, however, said confidence in Hegseth has dropped among Republicans because of his battles with senior military leaders who have strong relations with policymakers on Capitol Hill.'


That Senate Republicans had confidence in Hegseth to begin with is damning.

And most – if not all – of these Republicans losing confidence voted to confirm Hegseth.

Republicans are incapable of sound, responsible governance.
i-VNk4pMZ.gif


"This dude be a idiot."
 
Just to give Hegseth ten minutes in a room with Kimmell, Colbert and others to beat the shit out of them would be worth him being Defense Secretary. And then do it again.
He could not do that to a group of Girl Scouts.

He and Patel are pretenders.
 
The most unrecognized shortcoming of this new generation of politicans and ''faces'' is, in my view, that they lack a fundamental grasp on the history of the world beyond the cookie cutter stuff. They particularly lack a grasp regarding the historic relationships of various nations long before America even came about.

I think that in some respects they're starting to be met with the consequence of this partcular shortcoming. But even when met with it, I still don't think they understand the relevance.
 
Last edited:
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom