Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wtf are you talking about? He wasn’t fighting anyone, he was attacked, he was chased until he couldn’t run anymore.. thank god he had a gun or he would be dead. Or in the hospital.
Jeanne d Arc die at around 19 years of age...by 17 she was running the revolution thing whatever she was doing. (she was crazy so I didn't pay that much attention to her).
Strange. She was by the way murdered after an unfair process and she changed the flow of history more into direction greater justice.
From my point of few this boy did not know, what he was really fighting for - and you all make here in the discussion about this boy and his wrong deeds elementary mistakes. I'm convinced you are all on your own the reason for such a wrong behavior. Everyone knows it is nonsense to fight against demonstrants with weapons, because weapons never convince anyone. Criminals have to be arrested - and all others should try to think about what has to be changed. US-Americans should not murder each other in street fights. That's a totally wrong way.
Wtf are you talking about? He wasn’t fighting anyone, he was attacked, he was chased until he couldn’t run anymore.. thank god he had a gun or he would be dead. Or in the hospital.
Jeanne d Arc die at around 19 years of age...by 17 she was running the revolution thing whatever she was doing. (she was crazy so I didn't pay that much attention to her).
Strange. She was by the way murdered after an unfair process and she changed the flow of history more into direction greater justice.
From my point of few this boy did not know, what he was really fighting for - and you all make here in the discussion about this boy and his wrong deeds elementary mistakes. I'm convinced you are all on your own the reason for such a wrong behavior. Everyone knows it is nonsense to fight against demonstrants with weapons, because weapons never convince anyone. Criminals have to be arrested - and all others should try to think about what has to be changed. US-Americans should not murder each other in street fights. That's a totally wrong way.
This "thank god" which you said here without to think will kill you. Are you convinced from the lies of anyone else or do you believe in your own lies or are you not able to think on your own at all? How many children do you like to send there to defend themselves with war weapons, coward, intrigant one? How many people will have to die, because of such stupidities?
Wtf are you talking about? He wasn’t fighting anyone, he was attacked, he was chased until he couldn’t run anymore.. thank god he had a gun or he would be dead. Or in the hospital.
Jeanne d Arc die at around 19 years of age...by 17 she was running the revolution thing whatever she was doing. (she was crazy so I didn't pay that much attention to her).
Strange. She was by the way murdered after an unfair process and she changed the flow of history more into direction greater justice.
From my point of few this boy did not know, what he was really fighting for - and you all make here in the discussion about this boy and his wrong deeds elementary mistakes. I'm convinced you are all on your own the reason for such a wrong behavior. Everyone knows it is nonsense to fight against demonstrants with weapons, because weapons never convince anyone. Criminals have to be arrested - and all others should try to think about what has to be changed. US-Americans should not murder each other in street fights. That's a totally wrong way.
This "thank god" which you said here without to think will kill you. Are you convinced from the lies of anyone else or do you believe in your own lies or are you not able to think on your own at all? How many children do you like to send there to defend themselves with war weapons, coward, intrigant one? How many people will have to die, because of such stupidities?
Idk how many lives and peoples livelihoods are Democrat mayors and governors going to let get slaughtered in the streets with no police protection? That’ll answer your questions about kids with guns going to protect citizens which is our right to do in a void of police protection
I “like” how people rattle off firearm information and think it translates into gun laws. You’d think They become experts on law just by reading a gun manual . No, its tough to rationalize killing people in self defense after you’ve initiated the altercation and are committing a criminal act at the same time.I love how people rattle off gun laws all day but avoid other laws, like assault, arson, burglary domestic terrorism...They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so richyou need to get your story straight. He’s already been charged with murder along with being a fugitive from justice warrent and awaits extradition. He was provided a public defender. Gee, he must have left the state after he killed two and wounded one. The charges are mounting up. It’s like leaving the scene of an accident, it becomes a whole new ball game even if you think killing people was justified.They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so rich
Jesus, he’s being tried as an adult.
and, he has a great public defender. Where’s the money coming from ? The NRA ? Wait, the VP Wayne LaPierre stole it all...
Kenosha shooter to stay in Illinois juvenile jail before extradition to Wisconsin, where he'd be tried as an adult
An extradition hearing for the 17-year-old, who faces five felony changes, is set for September 25.www.newsweek.com
“Rittenhouse faces five felony charges, including first-degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide. He is also facing a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor. Open carry of guns is legal in Wisconsin for adults over 18.“
So, I ask this question, you believe gun ownership should be limited, and that there should be strict regulation on firearms. You also believe that the constitution didn't intend to mean certain types of weapons?Defining what milita was back then makes anyone‘s “ opinion” suspectThe term "militia" means "armed civilian". And anyone has the Right to defend themselves from attacking criminals. If anyone should have stayed home it certainly was the rioters who got exactly what they deserved. One of them was also armed and most certainly in violation of the law was he not also "militia"?Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
"A communist insurrection"??? You're posts get dumber every single day.
This idiot wasn't part of any "militia", well organized or otherwise. He thought it would be cool to go out and shoot protestors. After all, if he's protecting property, it's not illegal to shoot people, right? Tell me, if the non-white protestors all started showing up with AR15's and other long guns, would you be so enthusiastic about the Second Amendment? If black people started walking around white neighbourhoods with their semi-automatic weapons, you'd see a ban on those guns so fast your head would spin.
What is happening is that idiot gun owners think they can go out and shoot people with impunity. This 17 year old piece of shit thought it would be fun to go out and shoot protestors, and this is what has happened. He killed two people and his life is now over. The little shit should have stayed home.
. Otherwise we paint ourselves into a corner. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE. The militia is our guard and reserve units. Technology mandated it. You’d have to be really ignorant to allow military weapon access to civilians. You’d like wise have to be really ignorant TO THINK black powder weapons have the same regs as those available today. Full autos and the like were an obvious realization of that. Only ignorant and poorly informed people would pretend that your rights are absolute. They are rights given only to those who qualify. Technology has mandated this acquiescence. The right to free speech has to be amended to include the internet for example all the control over the material we have , or we promote anarchy. Deal with it. It’s the same with EVERY RIGHT.
HahaI “like” how people rattle off firearm information and think it translates into gun laws. You’d think They become experts on law just by reading a gun manual . No, its tough to rationalize killing people in self defense after you’ve initiated the altercation and are committing a criminal act at the same time.I love how people rattle off gun laws all day but avoid other laws, like assault, arson, burglary domestic terrorism...They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so richyou need to get your story straight. He’s already been charged with murder along with being a fugitive from justice warrent and awaits extradition. He was provided a public defender. Gee, he must have left the state after he killed two and wounded one. The charges are mounting up. It’s like leaving the scene of an accident, it becomes a whole new ball game even if you think killing people was justified.They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so rich
Jesus, he’s being tried as an adult.
and, he has a great public defender. Where’s the money coming from ? The NRA ? Wait, the VP Wayne LaPierre stole it all...
Kenosha shooter to stay in Illinois juvenile jail before extradition to Wisconsin, where he'd be tried as an adult
An extradition hearing for the 17-year-old, who faces five felony changes, is set for September 25.
“Rittenhouse faces five felony charges, including first-degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide. He is also facing a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor. Open carry of guns is legal in Wisconsin for adults over 18.“
So, I ask this question, you believe gun ownership should be limited, and that there should be strict regulation on firearms. You also believe that the constitution didn't intend to mean certain types of weapons?Defining what milita was back then makes anyone‘s “ opinion” suspectThe term "militia" means "armed civilian". And anyone has the Right to defend themselves from attacking criminals. If anyone should have stayed home it certainly was the rioters who got exactly what they deserved. One of them was also armed and most certainly in violation of the law was he not also "militia"?Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
"A communist insurrection"??? You're posts get dumber every single day.
This idiot wasn't part of any "militia", well organized or otherwise. He thought it would be cool to go out and shoot protestors. After all, if he's protecting property, it's not illegal to shoot people, right? Tell me, if the non-white protestors all started showing up with AR15's and other long guns, would you be so enthusiastic about the Second Amendment? If black people started walking around white neighbourhoods with their semi-automatic weapons, you'd see a ban on those guns so fast your head would spin.
What is happening is that idiot gun owners think they can go out and shoot people with impunity. This 17 year old piece of shit thought it would be fun to go out and shoot protestors, and this is what has happened. He killed two people and his life is now over. The little shit should have stayed home.
. Otherwise we paint ourselves into a corner. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE. The militia is our guard and reserve units. Technology mandated it. You’d have to be really ignorant to allow military weapon access to civilians. You’d like wise have to be really ignorant TO THINK black powder weapons have the same regs as those available today. Full autos and the like were an obvious realization of that. Only ignorant and poorly informed people would pretend that your rights are absolute. They are rights given only to those who qualify. Technology has mandated this acquiescence. The right to free speech has to be amended to include the internet for example all the control over the material we have , or we promote anarchy. Deal with it. It’s the same with EVERY RIGHT.
The question then is why don't all anti gunners turn in their firearms? I'm sure there are plenty of leftists who own these very guns you deem should be unavailable to civilians. Also, why are blue states not enacting crushing gun control and harshly restrictive regulations? If you believe that it can be done, then why aren't these deep blue states legislating more restrictive gun control?
I didn't ask that. I asked, if leftists want these stirct gun control laws, why haven't they enacted them in their own states? If the residents of that state agree, and an overwhelming majority of the state house and senate are for it, and if you believe the constitution only was relevant to certain weapons, then there is no reason that deep blue states should not have already enacted severe gun control laws.HahaI “like” how people rattle off firearm information and think it translates into gun laws. You’d think They become experts on law just by reading a gun manual . No, its tough to rationalize killing people in self defense after you’ve initiated the altercation and are committing a criminal act at the same time.I love how people rattle off gun laws all day but avoid other laws, like assault, arson, burglary domestic terrorism...They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so richyou need to get your story straight. He’s already been charged with murder along with being a fugitive from justice warrent and awaits extradition. He was provided a public defender. Gee, he must have left the state after he killed two and wounded one. The charges are mounting up. It’s like leaving the scene of an accident, it becomes a whole new ball game even if you think killing people was justified.They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so rich
Jesus, he’s being tried as an adult.
and, he has a great public defender. Where’s the money coming from ? The NRA ? Wait, the VP Wayne LaPierre stole it all...
Kenosha shooter to stay in Illinois juvenile jail before extradition to Wisconsin, where he'd be tried as an adult
An extradition hearing for the 17-year-old, who faces five felony changes, is set for September 25.
“Rittenhouse faces five felony charges, including first-degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide. He is also facing a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor. Open carry of guns is legal in Wisconsin for adults over 18.“
So, I ask this question, you believe gun ownership should be limited, and that there should be strict regulation on firearms. You also believe that the constitution didn't intend to mean certain types of weapons?Defining what milita was back then makes anyone‘s “ opinion” suspectThe term "militia" means "armed civilian". And anyone has the Right to defend themselves from attacking criminals. If anyone should have stayed home it certainly was the rioters who got exactly what they deserved. One of them was also armed and most certainly in violation of the law was he not also "militia"?Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
"A communist insurrection"??? You're posts get dumber every single day.
This idiot wasn't part of any "militia", well organized or otherwise. He thought it would be cool to go out and shoot protestors. After all, if he's protecting property, it's not illegal to shoot people, right? Tell me, if the non-white protestors all started showing up with AR15's and other long guns, would you be so enthusiastic about the Second Amendment? If black people started walking around white neighbourhoods with their semi-automatic weapons, you'd see a ban on those guns so fast your head would spin.
What is happening is that idiot gun owners think they can go out and shoot people with impunity. This 17 year old piece of shit thought it would be fun to go out and shoot protestors, and this is what has happened. He killed two people and his life is now over. The little shit should have stayed home.
. Otherwise we paint ourselves into a corner. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE. The militia is our guard and reserve units. Technology mandated it. You’d have to be really ignorant to allow military weapon access to civilians. You’d like wise have to be really ignorant TO THINK black powder weapons have the same regs as those available today. Full autos and the like were an obvious realization of that. Only ignorant and poorly informed people would pretend that your rights are absolute. They are rights given only to those who qualify. Technology has mandated this acquiescence. The right to free speech has to be amended to include the internet for example all the control over the material we have , or we promote anarchy. Deal with it. It’s the same with EVERY RIGHT.
The question then is why don't all anti gunners turn in their firearms? I'm sure there are plenty of leftists who own these very guns you deem should be unavailable to civilians. Also, why are blue states not enacting crushing gun control and harshly restrictive regulations? If you believe that it can be done, then why aren't these deep blue states legislating more restrictive gun control?
Of course. Anything else is ridiculously stupid. You can’t allow kids, felons and mentally ill to own and sell and distribute full automatic weapons let alone flame throwers, explosive cells and shoulder fired rpgs.....I don’t know what you guys are thinking. You’re mentally deranged to think the school grounds, churches and street corners should be distribution grounds for military and high volume weapons. Imagine a twelve year old taking a machine gun to school every day.
you guys are ignorant. this stupid argument that the constitution and Supreme Court should not allow regulation is the dumbest thing on earth.,
You don’t know much about state government. Just like the Fed, they need the Governor and both houses. Still, many states DO have universal background check. And with few exceptions, EVERY STATE WITH STRONGER GUN LAWS HAS LESS GUN VIOLENCE.I didn't ask that. I asked, if leftists want these stirct gun control laws, why haven't they enacted them in their own states? If the residents of that state agree, and an overwhelming majority of the state house and senate are for it, and if you believe the constitution only was relevant to certain weapons, then there is no reason that deep blue states should not have already enacted severe gun control laws.HahaI “like” how people rattle off firearm information and think it translates into gun laws. You’d think They become experts on law just by reading a gun manual . No, its tough to rationalize killing people in self defense after you’ve initiated the altercation and are committing a criminal act at the same time.I love how people rattle off gun laws all day but avoid other laws, like assault, arson, burglary domestic terrorism...They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so richyou need to get your story straight. He’s already been charged with murder along with being a fugitive from justice warrent and awaits extradition. He was provided a public defender. Gee, he must have left the state after he killed two and wounded one. The charges are mounting up. It’s like leaving the scene of an accident, it becomes a whole new ball game even if you think killing people was justified.They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so rich
Jesus, he’s being tried as an adult.
and, he has a great public defender. Where’s the money coming from ? The NRA ? Wait, the VP Wayne LaPierre stole it all...
Kenosha shooter to stay in Illinois juvenile jail before extradition to Wisconsin, where he'd be tried as an adult
An extradition hearing for the 17-year-old, who faces five felony changes, is set for September 25.
“Rittenhouse faces five felony charges, including first-degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide. He is also facing a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor. Open carry of guns is legal in Wisconsin for adults over 18.“
So, I ask this question, you believe gun ownership should be limited, and that there should be strict regulation on firearms. You also believe that the constitution didn't intend to mean certain types of weapons?Defining what milita was back then makes anyone‘s “ opinion” suspectThe term "militia" means "armed civilian". And anyone has the Right to defend themselves from attacking criminals. If anyone should have stayed home it certainly was the rioters who got exactly what they deserved. One of them was also armed and most certainly in violation of the law was he not also "militia"?Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
"A communist insurrection"??? You're posts get dumber every single day.
This idiot wasn't part of any "militia", well organized or otherwise. He thought it would be cool to go out and shoot protestors. After all, if he's protecting property, it's not illegal to shoot people, right? Tell me, if the non-white protestors all started showing up with AR15's and other long guns, would you be so enthusiastic about the Second Amendment? If black people started walking around white neighbourhoods with their semi-automatic weapons, you'd see a ban on those guns so fast your head would spin.
What is happening is that idiot gun owners think they can go out and shoot people with impunity. This 17 year old piece of shit thought it would be fun to go out and shoot protestors, and this is what has happened. He killed two people and his life is now over. The little shit should have stayed home.
. Otherwise we paint ourselves into a corner. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE. The militia is our guard and reserve units. Technology mandated it. You’d have to be really ignorant to allow military weapon access to civilians. You’d like wise have to be really ignorant TO THINK black powder weapons have the same regs as those available today. Full autos and the like were an obvious realization of that. Only ignorant and poorly informed people would pretend that your rights are absolute. They are rights given only to those who qualify. Technology has mandated this acquiescence. The right to free speech has to be amended to include the internet for example all the control over the material we have , or we promote anarchy. Deal with it. It’s the same with EVERY RIGHT.
The question then is why don't all anti gunners turn in their firearms? I'm sure there are plenty of leftists who own these very guns you deem should be unavailable to civilians. Also, why are blue states not enacting crushing gun control and harshly restrictive regulations? If you believe that it can be done, then why aren't these deep blue states legislating more restrictive gun control?
Of course. Anything else is ridiculously stupid. You can’t allow kids, felons and mentally ill to own and sell and distribute full automatic weapons let alone flame throwers, explosive cells and shoulder fired rpgs.....I don’t know what you guys are thinking. You’re mentally deranged to think the school grounds, churches and street corners should be distribution grounds for military and high volume weapons. Imagine a twelve year old taking a machine gun to school every day.
you guys are ignorant. this stupid argument that the constitution and Supreme Court should not allow regulation is the dumbest thing on earth.,
Why haven't they?
The towns with the least gun crimes are the ones with the least gun laws.. so what are you talking aboutYou don’t know much about state government. Just like the Fed, they need the Governor and both houses. Still, many states DO have universal background check. And with few exceptions, EVERY STATE WITH STRONGER GUN LAWS HAS LESS GUN VIOLENCE.I didn't ask that. I asked, if leftists want these stirct gun control laws, why haven't they enacted them in their own states? If the residents of that state agree, and an overwhelming majority of the state house and senate are for it, and if you believe the constitution only was relevant to certain weapons, then there is no reason that deep blue states should not have already enacted severe gun control laws.HahaI “like” how people rattle off firearm information and think it translates into gun laws. You’d think They become experts on law just by reading a gun manual . No, its tough to rationalize killing people in self defense after you’ve initiated the altercation and are committing a criminal act at the same time.I love how people rattle off gun laws all day but avoid other laws, like assault, arson, burglary domestic terrorism...They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so richyou need to get your story straight. He’s already been charged with murder along with being a fugitive from justice warrent and awaits extradition. He was provided a public defender. Gee, he must have left the state after he killed two and wounded one. The charges are mounting up. It’s like leaving the scene of an accident, it becomes a whole new ball game even if you think killing people was justified.They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so rich
Jesus, he’s being tried as an adult.
and, he has a great public defender. Where’s the money coming from ? The NRA ? Wait, the VP Wayne LaPierre stole it all...
Kenosha shooter to stay in Illinois juvenile jail before extradition to Wisconsin, where he'd be tried as an adult
An extradition hearing for the 17-year-old, who faces five felony changes, is set for September 25.
“Rittenhouse faces five felony charges, including first-degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide. He is also facing a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor. Open carry of guns is legal in Wisconsin for adults over 18.“
So, I ask this question, you believe gun ownership should be limited, and that there should be strict regulation on firearms. You also believe that the constitution didn't intend to mean certain types of weapons?Defining what milita was back then makes anyone‘s “ opinion” suspectThe term "militia" means "armed civilian". And anyone has the Right to defend themselves from attacking criminals. If anyone should have stayed home it certainly was the rioters who got exactly what they deserved. One of them was also armed and most certainly in violation of the law was he not also "militia"?Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
"A communist insurrection"??? You're posts get dumber every single day.
This idiot wasn't part of any "militia", well organized or otherwise. He thought it would be cool to go out and shoot protestors. After all, if he's protecting property, it's not illegal to shoot people, right? Tell me, if the non-white protestors all started showing up with AR15's and other long guns, would you be so enthusiastic about the Second Amendment? If black people started walking around white neighbourhoods with their semi-automatic weapons, you'd see a ban on those guns so fast your head would spin.
What is happening is that idiot gun owners think they can go out and shoot people with impunity. This 17 year old piece of shit thought it would be fun to go out and shoot protestors, and this is what has happened. He killed two people and his life is now over. The little shit should have stayed home.
. Otherwise we paint ourselves into a corner. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE. The militia is our guard and reserve units. Technology mandated it. You’d have to be really ignorant to allow military weapon access to civilians. You’d like wise have to be really ignorant TO THINK black powder weapons have the same regs as those available today. Full autos and the like were an obvious realization of that. Only ignorant and poorly informed people would pretend that your rights are absolute. They are rights given only to those who qualify. Technology has mandated this acquiescence. The right to free speech has to be amended to include the internet for example all the control over the material we have , or we promote anarchy. Deal with it. It’s the same with EVERY RIGHT.
The question then is why don't all anti gunners turn in their firearms? I'm sure there are plenty of leftists who own these very guns you deem should be unavailable to civilians. Also, why are blue states not enacting crushing gun control and harshly restrictive regulations? If you believe that it can be done, then why aren't these deep blue states legislating more restrictive gun control?
Of course. Anything else is ridiculously stupid. You can’t allow kids, felons and mentally ill to own and sell and distribute full automatic weapons let alone flame throwers, explosive cells and shoulder fired rpgs.....I don’t know what you guys are thinking. You’re mentally deranged to think the school grounds, churches and street corners should be distribution grounds for military and high volume weapons. Imagine a twelve year old taking a machine gun to school every day.
you guys are ignorant. this stupid argument that the constitution and Supreme Court should not allow regulation is the dumbest thing on earth.,
Why haven't they?
Are you aware that you are delusional?Defining what milita was back then makes anyone‘s “ opinion” suspectThe term "militia" means "armed civilian". And anyone has the Right to defend themselves from attacking criminals. If anyone should have stayed home it certainly was the rioters who got exactly what they deserved. One of them was also armed and most certainly in violation of the law was he not also "militia"?Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
"A communist insurrection"??? You're posts get dumber every single day.
This idiot wasn't part of any "militia", well organized or otherwise. He thought it would be cool to go out and shoot protestors. After all, if he's protecting property, it's not illegal to shoot people, right? Tell me, if the non-white protestors all started showing up with AR15's and other long guns, would you be so enthusiastic about the Second Amendment? If black people started walking around white neighbourhoods with their semi-automatic weapons, you'd see a ban on those guns so fast your head would spin.
What is happening is that idiot gun owners think they can go out and shoot people with impunity. This 17 year old piece of shit thought it would be fun to go out and shoot protestors, and this is what has happened. He killed two people and his life is now over. The little shit should have stayed home.
. Otherwise we paint ourselves into a corner. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE.Technology mandated it. You’d have to be really ignorant to allow military weapon access to civilians. You’d like wise have to be really ignorant TO THINK black powder weapons have the same regs as those available today. Full autos and the like were an obvious realization of that. Only ignorant and poorly informed people would pretend that your rights are absolute. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE.Technology has mandated this acquiescence. The right to free speech has to be amended to include the internet for example all the control over the material we have , or we promote anarchy. Deal with it. It’s the same with EVERY RIGHT.
Oh please do try to prove that. I call bullspit!You don’t know much about state government. Just like the Fed, they need the Governor and both houses. Still, many states DO have universal background check. And with few exceptions, EVERY STATE WITH STRONGER GUN LAWS HAS LESS GUN VIOLENCE.I didn't ask that. I asked, if leftists want these stirct gun control laws, why haven't they enacted them in their own states? If the residents of that state agree, and an overwhelming majority of the state house and senate are for it, and if you believe the constitution only was relevant to certain weapons, then there is no reason that deep blue states should not have already enacted severe gun control laws.HahaI “like” how people rattle off firearm information and think it translates into gun laws. You’d think They become experts on law just by reading a gun manual . No, its tough to rationalize killing people in self defense after you’ve initiated the altercation and are committing a criminal act at the same time.I love how people rattle off gun laws all day but avoid other laws, like assault, arson, burglary domestic terrorism...They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so richyou need to get your story straight. He’s already been charged with murder along with being a fugitive from justice warrent and awaits extradition. He was provided a public defender. Gee, he must have left the state after he killed two and wounded one. The charges are mounting up. It’s like leaving the scene of an accident, it becomes a whole new ball game even if you think killing people was justified.They can't prosecute him for murder if the event is ruled a case of self-defense.As usual, you guys are forgetting one set of people. The lawyers of those he killed. They aren’t restrained in any decision made by local governments.His lawyers are doing it probono as he will also be able to sue for being attacked by the dead criminals -----who have nothing and the city of Kenosha for not policing the violent criminals which is their job. Right now the city of Kenosha is negotiations to drop charges against the boy in all liklihood and all they want in exchange is for him not to sue them.He’s underaged. He stands a good chance of getting sued regardless of his criminal trial results. He killed two people, he’ll need copious money for lawyer fees. Trump can’t pardon him for state crimes or civil suits.Why what did he do wrongHe’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.This kid is going to be so rich
Jesus, he’s being tried as an adult.
and, he has a great public defender. Where’s the money coming from ? The NRA ? Wait, the VP Wayne LaPierre stole it all...
Kenosha shooter to stay in Illinois juvenile jail before extradition to Wisconsin, where he'd be tried as an adult
An extradition hearing for the 17-year-old, who faces five felony changes, is set for September 25.
“Rittenhouse faces five felony charges, including first-degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide. He is also facing a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor. Open carry of guns is legal in Wisconsin for adults over 18.“
So, I ask this question, you believe gun ownership should be limited, and that there should be strict regulation on firearms. You also believe that the constitution didn't intend to mean certain types of weapons?Defining what milita was back then makes anyone‘s “ opinion” suspectThe term "militia" means "armed civilian". And anyone has the Right to defend themselves from attacking criminals. If anyone should have stayed home it certainly was the rioters who got exactly what they deserved. One of them was also armed and most certainly in violation of the law was he not also "militia"?Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
"A communist insurrection"??? You're posts get dumber every single day.
This idiot wasn't part of any "militia", well organized or otherwise. He thought it would be cool to go out and shoot protestors. After all, if he's protecting property, it's not illegal to shoot people, right? Tell me, if the non-white protestors all started showing up with AR15's and other long guns, would you be so enthusiastic about the Second Amendment? If black people started walking around white neighbourhoods with their semi-automatic weapons, you'd see a ban on those guns so fast your head would spin.
What is happening is that idiot gun owners think they can go out and shoot people with impunity. This 17 year old piece of shit thought it would be fun to go out and shoot protestors, and this is what has happened. He killed two people and his life is now over. The little shit should have stayed home.
. Otherwise we paint ourselves into a corner. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE. The militia is our guard and reserve units. Technology mandated it. You’d have to be really ignorant to allow military weapon access to civilians. You’d like wise have to be really ignorant TO THINK black powder weapons have the same regs as those available today. Full autos and the like were an obvious realization of that. Only ignorant and poorly informed people would pretend that your rights are absolute. They are rights given only to those who qualify. Technology has mandated this acquiescence. The right to free speech has to be amended to include the internet for example all the control over the material we have , or we promote anarchy. Deal with it. It’s the same with EVERY RIGHT.
The question then is why don't all anti gunners turn in their firearms? I'm sure there are plenty of leftists who own these very guns you deem should be unavailable to civilians. Also, why are blue states not enacting crushing gun control and harshly restrictive regulations? If you believe that it can be done, then why aren't these deep blue states legislating more restrictive gun control?
Of course. Anything else is ridiculously stupid. You can’t allow kids, felons and mentally ill to own and sell and distribute full automatic weapons let alone flame throwers, explosive cells and shoulder fired rpgs.....I don’t know what you guys are thinking. You’re mentally deranged to think the school grounds, churches and street corners should be distribution grounds for military and high volume weapons. Imagine a twelve year old taking a machine gun to school every day.
you guys are ignorant. this stupid argument that the constitution and Supreme Court should not allow regulation is the dumbest thing on earth.,
Why haven't they?
Why do you want to expand every right but the right to keep and bear arms? By your logic as related to the first amendment, the second should allow citizens to own Abrams tanks and Lightning II or Raptor jet fighters. In the day the second amendment was written, citizens could own far more than black powder muskets. They could own artillery pieces and private warships as well. If rights weren’t absolute, they wouldn’t be rights. Rights aren’t granted, they are inherent.Defining what milita was back then makes anyone‘s “ opinion” suspectThe term "militia" means "armed civilian". And anyone has the Right to defend themselves from attacking criminals. If anyone should have stayed home it certainly was the rioters who got exactly what they deserved. One of them was also armed and most certainly in violation of the law was he not also "militia"?Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
"A communist insurrection"??? You're posts get dumber every single day.
This idiot wasn't part of any "militia", well organized or otherwise. He thought it would be cool to go out and shoot protestors. After all, if he's protecting property, it's not illegal to shoot people, right? Tell me, if the non-white protestors all started showing up with AR15's and other long guns, would you be so enthusiastic about the Second Amendment? If black people started walking around white neighbourhoods with their semi-automatic weapons, you'd see a ban on those guns so fast your head would spin.
What is happening is that idiot gun owners think they can go out and shoot people with impunity. This 17 year old piece of shit thought it would be fun to go out and shoot protestors, and this is what has happened. He killed two people and his life is now over. The little shit should have stayed home.
. Otherwise we paint ourselves into a corner. The SC ‘S job is to define the constitutIon. ITS NOT YOURS OR MINE. The militia is our guard and reserve units. Technology mandated it. You’d have to be really ignorant to allow military weapon access to civilians. You’d like wise have to be really ignorant TO THINK black powder weapons have the same regs as those available today. Full autos and the like were an obvious realization of that. Only ignorant and poorly informed people would pretend that your rights are absolute. They are rights given only to those who qualify. Technology has mandated this acquiescence. The right to free speech has to be amended to include the internet for example all the control over the material we have , or we promote anarchy. Deal with it. It’s the same with EVERY RIGHT.
The progs are mad because now they know they don't have free reign to assault people whenever they like.
It's not "aggressive nonsense." It's the simple truth.
Do you think to say aggressive nonsense extremisticly loud makes anything true or better?
No it's the truth you Communist Democrat asshat
Do you think to say aggressive nonsense extremisticly loud makes anything true or better?
You might want to try running that past somebody who is an English speaker and try it again.
Do you think to say aggressive nonsense extremisticly loud makes anything true or better?
It's not "aggressive nonsense." It's the simple truth.
Do you think to say aggressive nonsense extremisticly loud makes anything true or better?
