Why Has No One Called Out Trump on His False Claim that Vice President Harris Didn't Pass The Bar?

Hardly. Businessmen with the kind of genius possessed by President Trump have no use for lying. Everybody knows that. He was always trusted by his fellow business partners for his accurate business dealings. People who are brave enough to debate fairly here are not imbeciles for their patriotic practices of debating.issues

That may seem so, but the American people deserve to know the verifiable truth, and if she doesn't want anyone to know her score, it is too darn bad because if she doesn't verify her credentials, she has no business running for the task of leading the American people.. And that is what I think. I think the Democrat Party should require their candidate to prove such intelligence with honesty in a presidential candidate.
When did this become the Humor forum?!

#DONNYDEBT
 
I was always a very inquisitive child and I still, to this day, can't imagine why people such as Trump, who is running for the highest office in the United States, is allowed to get away with making these types of ridiculous false statements:

Donald Trump's claims about Vice President Kamala Harris not being smart and suggesting she didn't pass the bar are not only baseless but highlight a staggering ignorance of the legal profession. Let’s be clear: Kamala Harris was a prosecutor. It is quite literally impossible to serve as a prosecutor without passing the bar exam. Prosecutors are attorneys responsible for representing the government in court — a position that requires passing the bar, which she obviously did.
If Trump can’t grasp that basic fact, it raises serious questions about his ability to distinguish between reality and his delusions. Criticizing someone for their intellect while ignoring fundamental legal requirements just reveals more about him than it ever could about Vice President Harris. She built a successful career as a district attorney and then attorney general of California — one of the largest legal systems in the country — while Trump continues to peddle falsehoods, perhaps relying on the fact that most of his supporters take his word as gospel, and apparently are unable to put two & two together and question why, when they don't add up to four.
The idiot did fail on her first attempt, so it's not a lie that Kamel failed the bar.
 
I was always a very inquisitive child and I still, to this day, can't imagine why people such as Trump, who is running for the highest office in the United States, is allowed to get away with making these types of ridiculous false statements:

Donald Trump's claims about Vice President Kamala Harris not being smart and suggesting she didn't pass the bar are not only baseless but highlight a staggering ignorance of the legal profession. Let’s be clear: Kamala Harris was a prosecutor. It is quite literally impossible to serve as a prosecutor without passing the bar exam. Prosecutors are attorneys responsible for representing the government in court — a position that requires passing the bar, which she obviously did.
If Trump can’t grasp that basic fact, it raises serious questions about his ability to distinguish between reality and his delusions. Criticizing someone for their intellect while ignoring fundamental legal requirements just reveals more about him than it ever could about Vice President Harris. She built a successful career as a district attorney and then attorney general of California — one of the largest legal systems in the country — while Trump continues to peddle falsehoods, perhaps relying on the fact that most of his supporters take his word as gospel, and apparently are unable to put two & two together and question why, when they don't add up to four.
In the last few posts I've asked a couple of Trumpsters if they really believe that she didn't pass the bar. By their "responses" (or lack thereof), it's pretty clear that they know she did. This is just a game they're playing. They know right from wrong, they know lies from truth. But they just talk themselves into believing absolutely stupid shit because it annoys those they hate and makes them feel noticed for a change. Finally, they are relevant.

Have you seen those interviews where Trumpsters say they think Biden is a body double, that Trump is still the President, that the 2020 Trump votes were beamed via satellite to Italy, changed to Biden, and sent back? At a superficial level, they play along and choose to believe. But nail them down, and they get squishy.

I've said it many times: This is a true, literal, group pathology, and the world has seen it before. It never ends well.
 
Last edited:
In the last few posts I've asked a couple of Trumpsters if they really believe that she didn't pass the bar. By their "responses" (or lack thereof), it's pretty clear that they know she did. This is just a game they're playing. They know right from wrong, they know lies from truth. But they just talk themselves into believing absolutely stupid shit because it annoys those they hate and makes them feel noticed for a change. Finally, they are relevant.

Have you seen those interviews where Trumpsters say they think Biden is a body double, that Trump is still the President, that the 2020 Trump votes were beamed via satellite to Italy, changed to Biden, and sent back? At a superficial level, they play along and choose to believe. But nail them down, and they get squishy.

I've said it many times: This is a true, literal, group pathology, and the world has seen it before. It never ends well.
🥨🥨🥨
:fu:
 
I voted for Clinton because first off she was very qualified. second, because I knew a trump presidency would be a mistake. We would have been better off with Clinton. Hopefully we don't end up wih Trump again and I will do my part to stop that by voting for Harris. Because number 1, Harris is very qualified hersef. More qualified than trump even if Trump sat in the office. Because that's all he did, sit in the office.
I could not vote for Clinton because of the distaste she has shown for some Black people by comments made but especially because of that "oh I didn't know [any better]" BS she came up with regarding having work emails on a private server hosted at her residence.

I believe the FBI downplayed the seriousness of it since apparently nothing negative happened as a result, at least that they could let us know about. From a cybersecurity perspective, as well as the legal production of documents in response the FOIA and subpoena duces tecum requests for production of documents, it definitely had the potential to cause compliance issues, but I digress.

I'm happy to have a candidate that I look forward to voting for although I would have voted for ANYONE they presented as long as it wasn't Trump. Not that I wasn't happy to vote for Biden as well but voting for Harris is different.
 
lol the so-called self-described 'journalist' in the OP failed to note that part, as usual. Just more evidence social promotion is rampant.
Your candidate made the false statement that she didn't pass the bar when it's obvious to everyone who knows anything about what is required to become an attorney, that she did pass the bar.

Your attempt to take a dig at me only illustrates your own ignorance because you erroneously believe that stating "she didn't pass the bar" is logically equivalent to stating "she failed the bar". The two statements do not equal each other, they do not even mean the same meaning.

I've explained this repeatedly, but formal logic is not easy to grasp if you've never encountered it before.
 
The idiot did fail on her first attempt, so it's not a lie that Kamel failed the bar.
It is a lie that "she dd not pass the bar".

So if she didn't pass the bar as Trump falsely claims, how was she able to hold positions as the City of San Francisco prosecuting attorney and as a prosecutor for the California Attorney General's office?

Can you answer that question, instead of introducing a new & different question?
 
Do you deny that she FAILED the bar?

PRETTY SIMPLE AS WELL.

:rolleyes:
After pages of discussion I don't know why this is so hard for you all.

The statement in my OP is that Trump made a false statement when he said that Harris didn't pass the bar. That's the topic, whether or not she passed the bar.

Not whether or not she failed the bar.
 
After pages of discussion I don't know why this is so hard for you all.

The statement in my OP is that Trump made a false statement when he said that Harris didn't pass the bar. That's the topic, whether or not she passed the bar.

Not whether or not she failed the bar.
Here, have a 🥨.
She FAILED it before she supposedly passed it.
Them's the facts.
You should have thought that through before clicking post for your OP.
:dunno:
 
After pages of discussion I don't know why this is so hard for you all.

The statement in my OP is that Trump made a false statement when he said that Harris didn't pass the bar. That's the topic, whether or not she passed the bar.

Not whether or not she failed the bar.
She failed it.

Greg
 
It is hard to imagine Kamala as a Prosecutor. She is so incredibly bad at thinking on her feet, how could she function in a courtroom? :dunno:
Ahhh.....but not always.....I heard her years ago when she was right on the ball. The deterioration evident I believe is due to Alcoholism.
 
Back
Top Bottom