Why Evolution is a Fairytale for Grown-Ups

[progressive hunter]

If you said abiogenesis is opinions based on assumptions, I'd agree. Evolution is not opinions based on assumptions, it is accepted science based on a wealth of evidence.


Apes share an ancestor with Old World monkeys who share an ancestor with New World monkeys who share an ancestor with Tarsises who share an ancestor with Lemurs who share an ancestor with...

is all you can do is repeat what youve been told and post fake pictures??

what did this ancestor look like that gave birth to them??

 

[Robert W]

Your ignorant racism is well documented, no need to keep reminding us.

It would be logical that were you to say White by your definition of conversations you are a RAcist.

You seem unable to intelligently discuss apes or whites for that matter.

 

[Robert W]

Apes share an ancestor with Old World monkeys who share an ancestor with New World monkeys who share an ancestor with Tarsises who share an ancestor with Lemurs who share an ancestor with...

Are apes an improvement or a negative over Old World Monkeys? Can you stop with the racist bullshit?

 

[Blaster]

Women have evolved quite a bit over the past twenty years.

 

[alang1216]

is all you can do is repeat what youve been told and post fake pictures??

You mean that I turn to experts in the field and link to their work? Guilty as charged. Besides repeating "is not" what do you bring to the thread?

what did this ancestor look like that gave birth to them??

The last common ancestor of monkeys and apes, including humans, lived approximately 25 to 30 million years ago, during the Oligocene epoch. This ancestor is considered to be a primitive catarrhine, a group of primates that includes all Old World monkeys and apes. While the exact appearance of this ancestor is not fully known, fossils like Propliopithecus zeuxis and Aegyptopithecus zeuxis provide clues about its features.

 

[Robert W]

I guess you missed this.

Yes, but I did see it moments before reading the above by you.
As time past, do you believe the evolved were improvements? IF not, why do you see them as negatives?

 

[alang1216]

You seem unable to intelligently discuss apes or whites for that matter.

Yes, one of us is having trouble grasping simple scientific concepts.

 

[alang1216]

Yes, but I did see it moments before reading the above by you.
As time past, do you believe the evolved were improvements? IF not, why do you see them as negatives?

Evolution 101: evolution does not have 'improvements' as a goal.

 

[Robert W]

I watched enough to know it was, itself, a fairy tale.

Seems you decline to be a scientist. I watched the entire video to understand why he called Evolution an adult fairy tale. This scientist once was angry when others said it. So he decided to stop being angry and examine the premise. He explained it had you watched the Video.

 

[progressive hunter]

You mean that I turn to experts in the field and link to their work? Guilty as charged. Besides repeating "is not" what do you bring to the thread?


The last common ancestor of monkeys and apes, including humans, lived approximately 25 to 30 million years ago, during the Oligocene epoch. This ancestor is considered to be a primitive catarrhine, a group of primates that includes all Old World monkeys and apes. While the exact appearance of this ancestor is not fully known, fossils like Propliopithecus zeuxis and Aegyptopithecus zeuxis provide clues about its features.

so 20-30 million yrs ago when no one was around to document what happened something happened??

and you say creationist are crazy and believe in magic,,

 

[Robert W]

Evolution 101: evolution does not have 'improvements' as a goal.

If improvements don't happen, the papa of the next animal seems to die out. You are aware of die outs, I hope.

 

[Robert W]

Evolution 101: evolution does not have 'improvements' as a goal.

Since animals of the past died out, of course not. But survivors are improving or dying out. If you don't know about that, what are you rambling on about?

 

[Woodznutz]

If you said abiogenesis is opinions based on assumptions, I'd agree. Evolution is not opinions based on assumptions, it is accepted science based on a wealth of evidence.


Apes share an ancestor with Old World monkeys who share an ancestor with New World monkeys who share an ancestor with Tarsises who share an ancestor with Lemurs who share an ancestor with...

Similar design, common designer.

 

[Robert W]

Similar design, common designer.

Here is a real world problem with evolution. It can't be replicated in science labs.

A demonstration is take a thousand cockroaches. Blend them and keep them under ideal conditions. The needed ingredients are all there. They decay. So how can nature collect needed ingredients to produce life from CHON (Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen and Nitrogen, all needed for life).
Science always experiments. Science mandates to construct life, correct ingredients must be there. And under ideal conditions for the ingredients to come alive.
Evolutionists have no answer or science to back up their claims.

 

[Robert W]

I don't comment of your propaganda pieces.

Racist!!!!!

 

[alang1216]

Seems you decline to be a scientist. I watched the entire video to understand why he called Evolution an adult fairy tale. This scientist once was angry when others said it. So he decided to stop being angry and examine the premise. He explained it had you watched the Video.

Tried again but still unconvinced, too many unfounded assumptions on his part. The irony is that he credits a creator with life and Christians believe that creator is the trinity, Jews believe it was Yahweh, Muslims Allah, Hindus Vishnu, etc.

 

[Woodznutz]

Tried again but still unconvinced, too many unfounded assumptions on his part. The irony is that he credits a creator with life and Christians believe that creator is the trinity, Jews believe it was Yahweh, Muslims Allah, Hindus Vishnu, etc.

Even primitive peoples believe in a 'great spirit creator' of some sort. None believe in evolution.

 

[alang1216]

Since animals of the past died out, of course not. But survivors are improving or dying out. If you don't know about that, what are you rambling on about?

What does 'improving' mean? If fish that live their whole lives in caves, lose their eyes, is that an improvement. Sounds like you're pushing evolution?

 

[alang1216]

Similar design, common designer.

Too many questions you can't answer. For example, why have two kinds of monkeys and why have no monkeys at all in Australia?

 

[Robert W]

Tried again but still unconvinced, too many unfounded assumptions on his part. The irony is that he credits a creator with life and Christians believe that creator is the trinity, Jews believe it was Yahweh, Muslims Allah, Hindus Vishnu, etc.

There is a great experiment that would prove your case. So not to kill animals, collect Cockroaches in a blender. Take the blended life forms and save them in an ideal temperature and environment condition so they are ideal. When you wait, and study, you learn they decayed.
So the question has to be, how can you get life when the components of life decay and do not come to life? Evolution never explains how life in the first case can be proven using experiments.