Why Evolution is a Fairytale for Grown-Ups

[alang1216]

My understanding is the Bible and archeology meet in the Kingdom of Judah ... the Bible claims a second Kingdom of Israel ... for which there's no physical evidence ...

The thought is the Bible was whipped up in order to justify Judah expansion ... "See, the Bible says we own your lands ... so buzz off will you?" ...

Alas, we'll probably never know even though we know more about this area's history than we know about almost any other area.

 

[dblack]

You get to walk slowly through this scientists discussions where his aim is to prove evolution is an adult fairy tale.

Be careful since he just may persuade you that evolution as taught is an adult fairy tale.

Looks like another moron who thinks evolution explains the origin of life. It's just how genetics works.

 

[alang1216]

Only got 2 minutes in and gave up. Our magnet poles shift every few hundred thousand years, not every 6,000 years, and there is no reason to predict they cause floods. Nonsensical pseudo-science.

 

[progressive hunter]

Only got 2 minutes in and gave up. Our magnet poles shift every few hundred thousand years, not every 6,000 years, and there is no reason to predict they cause floods. Nonsensical pseudo-science.

if you say so

 

[dblack]

Only got 2 minutes in and gave up. Our magnet poles shift every few hundred thousand years, not every 6,000 years, and there is no reason to predict they cause floods. Nonsensical pseudo-science.

I appreciate when they lead with that kind of nonsense. Beats wasting time on the whole video.

 

[Woodznutz]

Why would he discuss a major counter-example to his reasoning? ...



Why did you post the video if you don't want to discuss it? ... can you at least save me the 24 minutes and tell us what part of the statistics of abiogenesis is in error ... our assumption is "once is enough" ... if so, then life readily follows where liquid water exists, all other building blocks of life as we know it already exist in abundance ...

Trust is philosophical ... science is about observation, ToE is what we see ... as fully demonstrated by dog breeding ... sounds like your complaint is about the sophisticated trickery with the statistical arts that's used to explain how we got to cellular life ... is it the creative arts you don't trust? ... personally I thought it was trick ... God Bless enzymes ...

Scientific theory is written in pencil ... don't treat it like it's carved in granite ... we can and regular do erase parts and fill in with new information ... it's not religion ... it's statistics !!! ...

Selective breeding doesn't demonstrate evolution.

 

[alang1216]

if you say so

Science say so. You can read it for yourself or, better yet, check the science for errors.

If there were a global flood as recently as this you'd think the Egyptians would have recorded it but they have no such myth.

 

[Woodznutz]

Any serious question about evolution is waved away by evolutionary scientists.

 

[alang1216]

Any serious question about evolution is waved away by evolutionary scientists.

View attachment 1111235

Any question asked by a creationist about evolution has already been asked and answered by evolutionary scientists.

 

[progressive hunter]

Any question asked by a creationist about evolution has already been asked and answered by evolutionary scientists.

at some point you need to stop sing creation to support evolution,,

it makes you seem like a liar,,

 

[DukeU]

A claim easily refuted.

LOL

As K. Hovind explains in the shortened video, your "evidence" wouldn't stand up in court.

You can't prove a fossil had any kids.

 

[DukeU]

observable, measurable and we need to be able to duplicate the results

Exactly.

Now, demonstrate evolution for the class.

 

[alang1216]

at some point you need to stop sing creation to support evolution,,

it makes you seem like a liar,,

at some point you need to stop denying evolution and offer an alternative theory

it makes you seem like a child screaming "is not"

 

[alang1216]

LOL

As K. Hovind explains in the shortened video, your "evidence" wouldn't stand up in court.

You can't prove a fossil had any kids.

Strawman. If I found a fossil of an ant a million years old, I can't say that that individual had kids (it didn't). I can say, and you'd have to agree, that some ant somewhere a million years ago, did have kids.

 

[DukeU]

Strawman. If I found a fossil of an ant a million years old, I can't say that that individual had kids (it didn't). I can say, and you'd have to agree, that some ant somewhere a million years ago, did have kids.

IF it had a time stamp.

But yes, ants produce ants. I do agree with that.

 

[progressive hunter]

at some point you need to stop denying evolution and offer an alternative theory

it makes you seem like a child screaming "is not"

lack of an alternative doesnt make evolution correct,,

and you using that shows you know evolution cant stand on its own merits,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Strawman. If I found a fossil of an ant a million years old, I can't say that that individual had kids (it didn't). I can say, and you'd have to agree, that some ant somewhere a million years ago, did have kids.

it also doesnt prove ants turned into a completely different kind of animal as evolution claims,,

 

[alang1216]

IF it had a time stamp.

But yes, ants produce ants. I do agree with that.

Fossils generally come with timestamps, sometimes absolute, sometimes relative.

 

[alang1216]

it also doesnt prove ants turned into a completely different kind of animal as evolution claims,,

Never said it does. However, as you look at older and older rocks, you'll find that a some point there are no ants to be found. If they didn't evolve, where did they come from? Be brave and say what you believe.

 

[ReinyDays]

Alas, we'll probably never know even though we know more about this area's history than we know about almost any other area.

There's a lot of history to be found there ... first civilian settler in Oregon was Jason Lee in 1843 AD !!! ...