Why don’t republicans seem to understand the consequences of tax cuts?

Can you explain why they grew so much more slowly AFTER the tax cut than before?
They didn’t, Simp.

they were actually going down before the Bush tax cuts.


1675177801118.png
 
Oh, so SPENDING is the problem.

Baby steps, Simp.

Stupid and obnoxious as always. Oh yes, and WRONG too.
If you say so.

Now, WTF does that have to do with revenues rising after the Trump across the board tax cut, Simp?

This is just how stupid you are. The answer is simple but you don't even have the good sense to google it and find out why.

Trump collected 10% repatriatiion taxes of off shore profits - a one time thing.
 
Stupid and obnoxious as always. Oh yes, and WRONG too.


This is just how stupid you are. The answer is simple but you don't even have the good sense to google it and find out why.

Trump collected 10% repatriatiion taxes of off shore profits - a one time thing.
Hey Stupid, look at the blue line. It is the INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX REVENUES.

See how it is going up?

1675178064076.png
 
The periods in question are

10/15 - 10/17

and

10/17 - 10/19

Your graph INDISPUTABLY show personal and corporate income tax receipts FALLING in the wake of the 2001 tax cuts, and on net growing at a LOWER rate than after 2009

Cretin.
You obviously have no clue WTF you are babbling about. When did the 2001 tax cuts get fully implemented? The 2003 cuts? According to YOUR LINK it wasn’t until 2010 that they were fully phased in.

Once again YOUR link bites you in the ass.
 
Other than the housing bubble collapse in 2008, and the Fauci flu pandemic in 2000, revenues went up.

What do you suppose caused higher debt when the govt was getting more money?

Hmmmmmmm………

View attachment 752484

Given that you're clearly a moron, why do you assert things?

You have demonstrated that you don't know a forking thing...not about the budget process, the numbers or the math.
 
You obviously have no clue WTF you are babbling about. When did the 2001 tax cuts get fully implemented? The 2003 cuts? According to YOUR LINK it wasn’t until 2010 that they were fully phased in.

Once again YOUR link bites you in the ass.
Stop retelling.....You're an imbecile..

If you are going to refer to sources, quote them verbatim.
 
Given that you're clearly a moron, why do you assert things?

You have demonstrated that you don't know a forking thing...not about the budget process, the numbers or the math.
Your source is a far left loon outfit, Simp.

Its so bad they have turned off the “About” and “who were are” tabs on their website.:auiqs.jpg:


The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) is a progressive American think tank that analyzes the impact of federal and state government budget policies.[2] A 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, the Center's stated mission is to "conduct research and analysis to help shape public debates over proposed budget and tax policies and to help ensure that policymakers consider the needs of low-income families and individuals in these debates."[3]

CBPP was founded in 1981 by Robert Greenstein, a former political appointee in the Jimmy Carter administration. Greenstein founded the organization, which is based in Washington, D.C., to provide an alternative perspective on the social policy initiatives of the Ronald Reagan administration.[4

 
Your source is a far left loon outfit, Simp.

Its so bad they have turned off the “About” and “who were are” tabs on their website.:auiqs.jpg:


The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) is a progressive American think tank that analyzes the impact of federal and state government budget policies.[2] A 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, the Center's stated mission is to "conduct research and analysis to help shape public debates over proposed budget and tax policies and to help ensure that policymakers consider the needs of low-income families and individuals in these debates."[3]

CBPP was founded in 1981 by Robert Greenstein, a former political appointee in the Jimmy Carter administration. Greenstein founded the organization, which is based in Washington, D.C., to provide an alternative perspective on the social policy initiatives of the Ronald Reagan administration.[4

You should have been able to discern that from the way they use CBO numbers....and necromathy...

Where are your sources, Tool?
 

Forum List

Back
Top